scholarly journals Prevalence of Gestational Diabetes and Risk of Progression to Type 2 Diabetes: a Global Perspective

2016 ◽  
Vol 16 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Yeyi Zhu ◽  
Cuilin Zhang
2018 ◽  
Vol 68 (669) ◽  
pp. e260-e267 ◽  
Author(s):  
Brian McMillan ◽  
Katherine Easton ◽  
Elizabeth Goyder ◽  
Brigitte Delaney ◽  
Priya Madhuvrata ◽  
...  

BackgroundDespite the seven-fold increased risk of type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM) among females previously diagnosed with gestational diabetes (GD), annual rates of follow-up in primary care are low. There is a need to consider how to reduce the incidence of progression to T2DM among this high-risk group.AimTo examine the views of females diagnosed with GD to ascertain how to improve primary care support postnatally, and the potential role of technology in reducing the risk of progression to T2DM.Design and settingA qualitative study of a purposive sample of 27 postnatal females leaving secondary care with a recent diagnosis of GD.MethodSemi-structured interviews were conducted with 27 females, who had been previously diagnosed with GD, at around 6–12 weeks postnatally. Interviews were audiotaped, transcribed, and analysed thematically.ResultsFacilitators and barriers to engaging in a healthy postnatal lifestyle were identified, the most dominant being competing demands on time. Although females were generally satisfied with the secondary care they received antenatally, they felt abandoned postnatally and were uncertain what to expect from their GP in terms of follow-up and support. Females felt postnatal care could be improved by greater clarity regarding this, and enhanced by peer support, multidisciplinary input, and subsidised facilities. Technology was seen as a potential adjunct by providing information, enabling flexible and personalised self-management, and facilitating social support.ConclusionA more tailored approach for females previously diagnosed with GD may help reduce the risk of progression to T2DM. A need for future research to test the efficacy of using technology as an adjunct to current care was identified.


Diabetes Care ◽  
2013 ◽  
Vol 37 (4) ◽  
pp. 909-911 ◽  
Author(s):  
Shannon D. Sullivan ◽  
Kathleen A. Jablonski ◽  
Jose C. Florez ◽  
Dana Dabelea ◽  
Paul W. Franks ◽  
...  

Diabetes ◽  
2018 ◽  
Vol 67 (Supplement 1) ◽  
pp. 1459-P
Author(s):  
CYNTHIA J. HERRICK ◽  
MATTHEW KELLER ◽  
MARGARET A. OLSEN

Diabetes ◽  
2020 ◽  
Vol 69 (Supplement 1) ◽  
pp. 1386-P
Author(s):  
SYLVIA E. BADON ◽  
FEI XU ◽  
CHARLES QUESENBERRY ◽  
ASSIAMIRA FERRARA ◽  
MONIQUE M. HEDDERSON

2021 ◽  
Vol 224 (2) ◽  
pp. S688-S689
Author(s):  
Nora Miles ◽  
Lauren Pavlik ◽  
Vishmaya Saravanan ◽  
Rachel Harrison ◽  
Anna Palatnik ◽  
...  

2021 ◽  
pp. 089033442110186
Author(s):  
Laurie Beth Griffin ◽  
Jia Jennifer Ding ◽  
Phinnara Has ◽  
Nina Ayala ◽  
Martha B. Kole-White

Background In patients with gestational diabetes, breastfeeding decreases the lifetime risk of Type 2 diabetes by half. Lactation consultation has been shown to increase breastfeeding rates in the general population but has not been assessed in a gestational diabetes population. Research Aims To determine if (1) a postpartum International Board Certified Lactation Consultant (IBCLC) consultation during delivery hospitalization improved inclusive (any) or exclusive breastfeeding rates at hospital discharge and 3 months postpartum in participants with GDM; and if (2) obstetrical providers’ acknowledgement of maternal feeding preference affected the rates of IBCLC consultation for patients. Methods This was a retrospective, comparative, secondary analysis of a prospective cohort ( N = 517) study of women gestational diabetes. Participants who received a IBCLC consultation ( n = 386; 74.5%) were compared to those who did not ( n = 131; 25.5%). Baseline demographics, antepartum characteristics, neonatal information, mode of infant feeding at hospital discharge and 3 months postpartum, and IBCLC consultation during postpartum hospitalization were measured. Results After adjusting for baseline differences, participants who received an IBCLC consultation were more likely to report any breastfeeding at postpartum discharge (aOR 4.87; 95% CI [2.67, 8.86]) and at 3 months postpartum (aOR 5.39; 95% CI [2.61, 11.16]) compared to participants who did not. However, there was no difference in exclusive breastfeeding rates between those who did and did not receive IBCLC consultation. Conclusion Inpatient IBCLC consultation during the immediate postpartum period was associated with improved rates of any breastfeeding in participants with GDM.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document