scholarly journals APASL HCV guidelines of virus-eradicated patients by DAA on how to monitor HCC occurrence and HBV reactivation

2019 ◽  
Vol 13 (6) ◽  
pp. 649-661 ◽  
Author(s):  
Tatsuo Kanda ◽  
George K. K. Lau ◽  
Lai Wei ◽  
Mitsuhiko Moriyama ◽  
Ming-Lung Yu ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Hbv Dna ◽  
Hbv Reactivation ◽  
Close Attention ◽  
Short Term ◽  
Direct Acting Antiviral ◽  
B Virus ◽  
Direct Acting ◽  
Very High

Abstract In the direct-acting antiviral (DAA) era for hepatitis C virus (HCV) infection, sustained virological response (SVR) is very high, but close attention must be paid to the possible occurrence of hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) and reactivation of hepatitis B virus (HBV) in patients with co-infection who achieved SVR in short term. HCC occurrence was more often observed in patients with previous HCC history. We found occurrence of HCC in 178 (29.6%) of 602 patients with previous HCC history (15.4 months mean follow-up post-DAA initiation) but, in contrast, in only 604 (1.3%) of 45,870 patients without previous HCC history (18.2 months mean follow-up). Thus, in these guidelines, we recommend the following: in patients with previous HCC history, surveillance at 4-month intervals for HCC by ultrasonography (US) and tumor markers should be performed. In patients without previous HCC history, surveillance at 6- to 12-month intervals for HCC including US is recommended until the long-term DAA treatment effects, especially for the resolution of liver fibrosis, are confirmed. This guideline also includes recommendations on how to follow-up patients who have been infected with both HCV and HBV. When HCV was eradicated in these HBsAg-positive patients or patients with previous HBV infection (anti-HBc and/or anti-HBs-positive), it was shown that HBV reactivation or HBV DNA reappearance was observed in 67 (41.4%) of 162 or 12 (0.9%) of 1317, respectively. For these co-infected patients, careful attention should be paid to HBV reactivation for 24 weeks post-treatment.

scholarly journals Absence of HBV Reactivation in Patients With Resolved HBV Infection Following DAA Therapy for Hepatitis C: A 1-Year Follow-up Study

2018 ◽  
Vol 6 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Marcus M Mücke ◽  
Victoria T Mücke ◽  
Kai-Henrik Peiffer ◽  
Christoph Sarrazin ◽  
Stefan Zeuzem ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Hepatitis C ◽  
Hepatitis B ◽  
De Novo ◽  
Hepatitis B Surface Antigen ◽  
Hbv Dna ◽  
Hbv Reactivation ◽  
Direct Acting Antiviral ◽  
Long Term Follow Up

Abstract Background Patients with chronic hepatitis C virus (HCV) infection and active or previous hepatitis B virus (HBV) are at risk of HBV reactivation (HBV-R) during direct-acting antiviral (DAA) therapy. Recent reports suggest that HBV-R may even occur several months after completion of DAA therapy. The aim of this study was to assess the risk of HBV-R in patients with resolved HBV after successful DAA therapy during long-term follow-up (FU). Methods Among 848 patients treated for chronic HCV, all patients with resolved HBV and long-term FU data were eligible for inclusion. Patients were HBV DNA/hepatitis B surface antigen (HBsAg)–negative at the end of therapy (EOT) and were followed for up to 52 weeks thereafter. Patients underwent regular alanine transaminase (ALT) testing, and additional HBV DNA/HBsAg testing was performed at FU week 12, end of FU, and in case of an ALT increase above the upper limit of normal (>ULN). Results A total of 108 patients were followed up for a mean (range) of 41.5 (24–52) weeks after EOT. None of the patients experienced reverse HBsAg seroconversion or reappearance of HBV DNA. One patient received a liver transplantation; 1 patient was diagnosed with de novo hepatocellular carcinoma, and 2 patients died. Eighteen patients (16.7%) had increased ALT levels (grade 0/1). Of those, the majority were male (72.2%) and significantly more patients had cirrhosis (66.7% vs 36.2%, P = .015) or received ribavirin as part of their treatment regimen (86.7% vs 46.8%, P = .041). None of these were associated with HBV-R. Conclusions Our results indicate that the risk of HBV-R in patients with resolved HBV treated with DAAs for HCV is low during long-term follow-up.

scholarly journals A211 SPONTANEOUS HBV REMISSION AFTER HBV REACTIVATION FOLLOWING TREATMENT WITH SOFOSBUVIR AND VELPATASVIR IN A PATIENT WITH HCV AND HBV CO-INFECTION: CASE REPORT

2021 ◽  
Vol 4 (Supplement_1) ◽  
pp. 242-243
Author(s):  
A Chiang ◽  
K Tsoi
Keyword(s):  
Hepatitis C ◽  
Hepatitis B ◽  
Antiviral Agents ◽  
Clinical Signs ◽  
Hbv Dna ◽  
Hcv Rna ◽  
Hbv Reactivation ◽  
Genotype 3 ◽  
Direct Acting Antiviral ◽  
Direct Acting

Abstract Background In co-infected patients with hepatitis B (HBV) and hepatitis C (HCV), the treatment of HCV with direct-acting antiviral agents (DAA) can cause HBV reactivation. However, there are no clear guidelines on the timing of treatment initiation, especially in the absence of clinical signs of flare. Aims Here we discuss the case of a 34-year-old female with HBV and HCV genotype 3 who had HBV reactivation following HCV treatment, but did not require nucleos(t)ide therapy. Methods She initially presented with chronic inactive hepatitis B and chronic hepatitis C with HBV DNA level of 67.5 IU/mL and HCV RNA level of 3.33 x 106 IU/mL. She completed a 12 week course of sofosbuvir and velpatasvir for HCV and achieved sustained virologic remission, but subsequently developed reactivation of her HBV with HBV DNA peaking at 3.41 x 104 IU/mL twelve weeks post-treatment. She did not develop any signs of hepatitis and a decision was made to monitor her clinically. Results Two years later, she spontaneously went into remission with her HBV DNA levels being <10 IU/mL. Conclusions The significance of this case is to illustrate HBV reactivation following treatment of HCV with DAAs may not necessitate immediate treatment, especially if there are no signs of flare. There have been similar reported cases, but larger prospective studies are required to determine the appropriate clinical context where monitoring may be acceptable instead of immediate treatment. Funding Agencies None

scholarly journals Evaluation of a Hepatitis B Virus Reactivation Prevention Program in Lymphoma Patients Receiving Immunochemotherapy

Blood ◽  
2016 ◽  
Vol 128 (22) ◽  
pp. 1801-1801
Author(s):  
Blanca Sanchez-Gonzalez ◽  
Montserrat Garcia-Retortillo ◽  
Teresa Murcia ◽  
Mariana Ferraro ◽  
Francesc Garcia-Pallarols ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Hepatitis B Virus ◽  
Hepatitis B ◽  
Hbv Dna ◽  
Hbv Reactivation ◽  
Antiviral Prophylaxis ◽  
B Virus ◽  
Group A ◽  
Chronic Hbv ◽  
Group B

Abstract INTRODUCTION Chemotherapy-induced hepatitis B virus (HBV) reactivation is a well-recognized complication and is a potentially life-threatening condition in cancer patients with chronic HBV (hepatitis B surface antigen [HBsAg]-positive). Rituximab has been associated with an increase in HBV reactivation in chronic HBV patients (45%) and even in patients with resolved infection (HBsAg negative and hepatitis B core antibody [anti-HBc]-positive (22%); however, the reported frequency varies among different studies. Current guidelines for management of chronic HBV recommend routine antiviral HBV prophylaxis with lymphoma before starting chemotherapy. In contrast, there is little evidence-based consensus regarding patients with resolved HBV infection. Aim: To analyze the incidence of HBV reactivation and the role of antiviral HBV prophylaxis in lymphoma patients with chronic HBV or resolved HBV treated with chemotherapy, immunotherapy or immunochemotherapy managed according to our institutional HBV guidelines. Secondary endpoints were to analyze the incidence of HBV in this population and HBV guidelines adherence. PATIENTS AND METHODS Lymphoma patients with chronic HBV or resolved HBV in a single center. HBV viral status definitions: Active Chronic HBV infection: HBsAg positive, anti-HBc positive and HBV DNA >2000 IU/mL; Inactive Carriers: HBsAg positive, Anti-HBc positive, HBV DNA undetectable or <2000 IU/mL with normal transaminases; Resolved HBV: HBsAg negative, anti-HBc positive, HBV DNA undetectable. HBV reactivation was defined as increased serum HBV DNA (≥1 log10), regardless of liver biochemistry or HBsAg status. Institutional HBV guidelines: serum samples were collected at baseline for HBsAg and anti-HBc testing in all lymphoma patients. Patients were evaluated by a hepatologist if any of them fulfilled HBV viral status definition. Baseline at screening and monitoring every 3 months during therapy and up to 24 months after completing therapy (assessment of liver biochemistry, serum HBV DNA, HBsAg and anti-HBs levels). Specific prophylaxis strategies according to HBV status: Group A (Active chronic HBV): treatment for HBV; Group B (Inactive carriers): antiviral HBV prophylaxis; Group C (Resolved HBV): antiviral HBV prophylaxis if rituximab containing-therapy or follow-up only if rituximab-free therapy. HBV antiviral prophylaxis was started before therapy and finished 12 months after completing therapy. RESULTS From January 2012 to January 2015, 227 lymphoma patients received chemotherapy or immunochemotherapy. 142 (63%) patients received rituximab-containing therapy. 43 (19%) patients were anti-HBc positive. Group A: 2 (1%) patients; Group B: 2 (1%) patients; Group C: 39 (17%) patients. 14 (6%) patients have coinfection with hepatitis C virus and 12 (5%) patients co-infection with human immunodeficiency virus (HIV). Adherence to HBV guidelines was 90%. Patients in Group A (n=2) and B (n=2) received antiviral treatment/prophylaxis before starting therapy. In the Group C, 16 (41%) patients underwent only follow-up and 23 (59%) patients received HBV antiviral prophylaxis (lamivudine in 4, entecavir in 8 and tenofovir in 11). Median duration of HBV prophylaxis was 18 months (95% CI: 16-19 months). After a median follow-up of 21 months, 2 patients developed HBV reactivation during lymphoma treatment: 1 from group B (reactivation rate of 50%) and 1 from group C (reactivation rate of 3%). Both patients had received rituximab-containing treatment and both developed HBV reactivation (without hepatitis flare) within the first 6 months after finishing antiviral HBV prophylaxis (delayed HBV reactivation). Outcome was favorable in both patients. Characteristics of HBV reactivation patients are shown in table I. Cumulative incidence of HBV reactivation at 12 and 24 months were 0% and 8%, respectively. CONCLUSION Our strategy of close monitoring patients with chronic HBV or resolved HBV that receive chemotherapy and adding antiviral HBV prophylaxis only in selected patients clearly decrease HBV reactivation. Nevertheless, this strategy may not fully protect patients from late HBV reactivations. Larger validation studies are needed to confirm our data and to establish the best cost-effective strategy in this lymphoma population, especially in the new era of inmunomodulatory drugs of their real involvement in HBV reactivation is unknown. Table 1 Table 1. Disclosures No relevant conflicts of interest to declare.

scholarly journals Hepatitis B virus Reactivation in Patients Receiving Tocilizumab for Rheumatoid Arthritis: A Long‐term, Retrospective Observational Study

2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Kuo Meng Hsuan ◽  
Chih-Wei Tseng ◽  
Ming-Chi Lu ◽  
Chien-Hsueh Tung ◽  
Kuo-Chih Tseng ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Rheumatoid Arthritis ◽  
Hepatitis B Virus ◽  
Hepatitis B ◽  
Hbv Reactivation ◽  
Antiviral Prophylaxis ◽  
Virus Reactivation ◽  
B Virus ◽  
Hepatitis Flare

Abstract Aim To investigate the risk of hepatitis B virus (HBV) reactivation in patients undergoing long-term tocilizumab (TCZ) therapy for rheumatoid arthritis (RA). Method From January 2011 through August 2019, a total of 134 RA patients who received TCZ at Dalin Tzu Chi Hospital were screened. Patients were excluded if they were < 20 years, without complete data, or received TCZ for less than 3 months. A total of 97 patients were enrolled in this retrospective study. Clinical data, co-medications, and the occurrence of HBV reactivation were recorded. Results Of the 97 enrolled patients, 7 were HBsAg+ (7.2%), 64 were HBsAg−/HBcAb+ (61%) and 26 were HBsAg−/HBcAb+ (26.8%). The median disease follow-up time was 9 years (range, 1–18 years). TCZ was administered for a median of 29 months (range, 3–91 months). Four patients (4.1%) experienced HBV reactivation after TCZ therapy. Of the 7 HBsAg+ patients, 4 received antiviral prophylaxis and had no HBV reactivation; the remaining 3 patients had no antiviral prophylaxis, and all 3 (100%) experienced early HBV reactivation and hepatitis flare (median time to event, 6 months; range, 5–8 months). Hyper-bilirubinemia occurred in 2 of these 3 patients, with mild prothrombin time prolongation in one. After salvage entecavir treatment, all patients had a favorable outcome. Of the 64 HBsAg−/HBcAb+ patients, only one became positive for serum HBV DNA (2.5 × 10 7 IU/mL) after 18 months of TCZ treatment (1.6%; 1/64). This patient was immediately treated with entecavir, which prevented hepatitis flare. Conclusions HBsAg+ RA patients undergoing TCZ treatment are at high risk of HBV reactivation, which is prevented by antiviral prophylaxis. HBsAg−/HBcAb+ patients also are at risk of HBV reactivation. Although their risk of reactivation is lower than that of HBsAg+ patients, strict monitoring of their HBV status is still necessary.

Lamivudine therapy for prevention of immunosuppressive-induced hepatitis B virus reactivation in hepatitis B surface antigen carriers

Blood ◽  
2002 ◽  
Vol 100 (2) ◽  
pp. 391-396 ◽  
Author(s):  
Oren Shibolet ◽  
Yaron Ilan ◽  
Shmuel Gillis ◽  
Ayala Hubert ◽  
Daniel Shouval ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Hepatitis B Virus ◽  
Hepatitis B ◽  
Immunosuppressive Therapy ◽  
Hepatitis B Surface Antigen ◽  
Hbv Dna ◽  
Hbv Reactivation ◽  
Hbsag Carriers ◽  
B Virus ◽  
Lamivudine Prophylaxis

Abstract Viral reactivation in hepatitis B surface antigen (HBsAg) carriers undergoing immunosuppressive therapy is well documented. To evaluate the role of lamivudine prophylaxis in Hepatitis B virus (HBV) carriers treated with immunosuppression for nonhepatic disorders, we reviewed our experience between 1997 and 2000 at Hadassah University Hospital (Jerusalem, Israel). Controls were patients who were HBV carriers and who, between 1990 and 1995, were treated for hematological malignancies but were not treated with lamivudine. Eighteen HBsAg-positive patients were treated with immunosuppression. Fourteen were males, with a mean age of 48 years. Eleven patients had lymphoma; 2 had colonic adenocarcinoma; and 5 had cryoglobulinemia, enophthalmitis, vasculitis, malignant histocytosis, or ulcerative colitis. Fourteen patients were treated with chemotherapy, and 4 with prolonged high-dose corticosteroids. All patients were HBsAg-positive; 4 had hepatitis B e antigen, and 10 had HBV DNA by polymerase chain reaction. Lamivudine was administered to 13 patients in the treatment group 1 to 60 days (mean, 15 days) before immunosuppressive treatment and continued 0.5 to 24 months (mean, 7 months) following initiation of immunosuppression. Mean follow-up after lamivudine administration was 21 months. Three patients died of lymphoma complications and 10 (77%) survived. None of the patients had clinical or serological evidence of HBV reactivation during or after lamivudine prophylaxis. Of 6 patients who presented with liver function test disturbances, 5 improved during combined lamivudine and immunosuppression treatment. At the end of follow-up, HBV DNA became undetectable in 2 of 10 patients. In 2 patients, seroconversion from HBsAg to anti-HBs was observed. In contrast, 2 of 5 control patients had HBV reactivation. Lamivudine prophylaxis in HBsAg carriers receiving immunosuppressive therapy may prevent HBV reactivation and hepatic failure.

scholarly journals Hepatitis B Virus Reactivation in Patients Receiving Interferon-Free Direct-Acting Antiviral Agents for Chronic Hepatitis C Virus Infection

2017 ◽  
Vol 4 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Chen-Hua Liu ◽  
Chun-Jen Liu ◽  
Tung-Hung Su ◽  
Yu-Jen Fang ◽  
Hung-Chih Yang ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Hepatitis B Virus ◽  
Hepatitis B ◽  
Antiviral Agents ◽  
Hbv Reactivation ◽  
Virus Reactivation ◽  
Hepatic Decompensation ◽  
Hepatitis B Virus Reactivation ◽  
Direct Acting Antiviral ◽  
B Virus ◽  
Direct Acting

Abstract Background Little is known about the risk of hepatitis B virus (HBV) reactivation in patients receiving interferon (IFN)-free direct-acting antiviral agents (DAAs) for hepatitis C virus (HCV). Methods Patients who were seropositive for HBV core antibody and who received IFN-free DAAs for HCV were enrolled. Hepatitis B virus reactivation was defined as reappearance of serum HBV deoxyribonucleic acid (DNA) ≥100 IU/mL in patients with baseline undetectable viral load, or ≥2 log10 IU/mL increase of HBV DNA in patients with baseline detectable viral load. Hepatitis B virus-related alanine aminotransferase (ALT) flare was defined as ALT ≥5 times upper limit of normal or ≥2 times of the baseline level. Hepatitis B virus-related hepatic decompensation was defined as presence of jaundice, coagulopathy, hepatic encephalopathy, or ascites. Results Compared with no HBV reactivation in 81 HBV surface antigen (HBsAg)-negative patients, 2 of 12 HBsAg-positive patients had HBV reactivation (0% [confidence interval {95% CI}, 0%–4.5%] vs 16.7% [95% CI, 4.7%–44.8%], P = .015). No patients had ALT flare or hepatic decompensation. Baseline HBsAg level at a cutoff value of 500 IU/mL was associated with HBV reactivation in HBsAg-positive patients. There was no HBsAg seroreversion in HBsAg-negative patients. Conclusions Hepatitis B virus reactivation is limited to HBsAg-positive patients receiving IFN-free DAAs for HCV. Higher baseline HBsAg levels are associated with HBV reactivation. The risk of ALT flares or hepatic decompensation is low in these patients.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document