Postoperative intra-abdominal infection is an independent prognostic factor of disease-free survival and disease-specific survival in patients with stage II colon cancer

2018 ◽  
Vol 20 (10) ◽  
pp. 1321-1328 ◽  
Author(s):  
P. Sánchez-Velázquez ◽  
M. Pera ◽  
M. Jiménez-Toscano ◽  
X. Mayol ◽  
X. Rogés ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Colon Cancer ◽  
Prognostic Factor ◽  
Disease Free Survival ◽  
Disease Specific Survival ◽  
Free Survival ◽  
Abdominal Infection ◽  
Stage Ii Colon Cancer ◽  
Intra Abdominal Infection ◽  
Disease Free ◽  
Disease Specific

scholarly journals The prognostic value of Immunoscore in patients with cancer: A pooled analysis of 10,328 patients

2020 ◽  
Vol 35 (3) ◽  
pp. 3-13 ◽  
Author(s):  
Xingxia Zhang ◽  
Jie Yang ◽  
Liang Du ◽  
Yong Zhou ◽  
Ka Li
Keyword(s):  
Colon Cancer ◽  
Overall Survival ◽  
Prognostic Value ◽  
Disease Free Survival ◽  
Pooled Analysis ◽  
Disease Specific Survival ◽  
Free Survival ◽  
Patients With Cancer ◽  
Disease Free ◽  
Disease Specific

Objectives: Over the past decade, some publications have reported that Immunoscore was associated with the prognosis of several cancers. To better understand this issue, we conducted this pooled analysis. Methods: We systematically searched PubMed, Embase, Web of Science, and the Cochrane Library from their inceptions to 15 May 2019 to identify relevant articles. The pooled hazard ratio (HR) and 95% confidence interval (CI) was estimated for overall survival, disease-free survival, and disease-specific survival. Results: A total of 26 cohort studies with 10,328 patients involving eight cancer specialties were evaluated mainly by the consensus Immunoscore. The pooled analysis indicated that a lower Immunoscore was associated with a poor overall survival (HR 2.23, 95% CI 1.58, 2.70), disease-free survival (HR 2.40, 95% CI 1.96, 2.49), and disease-specific survival (HR 2.81, 95% CI 2.10, 3.77) for all cancers. The same convincing results were found in colorectal cancer, gastric cancer, and non-small cell lung cancer (especially the consensus Immunoscore for colon cancer). In five other types of cancer the results were similar, but the sample sizes were limited. Conclusions: These findings support that Immunoscore is significantly associated with the prognosis of patients with cancer. It provides a reliable estimate of the risk of recurrence in patients with colon cancer. However, more high-quality studies are necessary to assess the prognostic value of Immunoscore in non-colon cancers.

scholarly journals Expression of EEF1A1 Is Associated with Prognosis of Patients with Colon Adenocarcinoma

2019 ◽  
Vol 8 (11) ◽  
pp. 1903 ◽  
Author(s):  
Eun kyo Joung ◽  
Jiyoung Kim ◽  
Nara Yoon ◽  
Lee-so Maeng ◽  
Ji Hoon Kim ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Colon Cancer ◽  
Multivariate Analysis ◽  
Prognostic Factor ◽  
Cox Regression ◽  
Disease Free Survival ◽  
Colon Adenocarcinoma ◽  
Independent Prognostic Factor ◽  
Free Survival ◽  
Cox Regression Analysis ◽  
Disease Free

Background: The prognostic role of the translational factor, elongation factor-1 alpha 1 (EEF1A1), in colon cancer is unclear. Objectives: The present study aimed to investigate the expression of EEF1A in tissues obtained from patients with stage II and III colon cancer and analyze its association with patient prognosis. Methods: A total of 281 patients with colon cancer who underwent curative resection were analyzed according to EEF1A1 expression. Results: The five-year overall survival in the high-EEF1A1 group was 87.7%, whereas it was 65.6% in the low-EEF1A1 expression group (hazard ratio (HR) 2.47, 95% confidence interval (CI) 1.38–4.44, p = 0.002). The five-year disease-free survival of patients with high EEF1A1 expression was 82.5%, which was longer than the rate of 55.4% observed for patients with low EEF1A1 expression (HR 2.94, 95% CI 1.72–5.04, p < 0.001). Univariate Cox regression analysis indicated that age, preoperative carcinoembryonic antigen level, adjuvant treatment, total number of metastatic lymph nodes, and EEF1A1 expression level were significant prognostic factors for death. In multivariate analysis, expression of EEF1A1 was an independent prognostic factor associated with death (HR 3.01, 95% CI 1.636–5.543, p < 0.001). EEF1A1 expression was also an independent prognostic factor for disease-free survival in multivariate analysis (HR 2.54, 95% CI 1.459–4.434, p < 0.001). Conclusions: Our study demonstrated that high expression of EEF1A1 has a favorable prognostic effect on patients with colon adenocarcinoma.

Cochrane systematic review and meta-analysis of adjuvant chemotherapy for stage II colon cancer.

2013 ◽  
Vol 31 (15_suppl) ◽  
pp. 3548-3548
Author(s):  
Brandon Matthew Meyers ◽  
Humaid Obaid Al-Shamsi ◽  
Alvaro Tell Figueredo
Keyword(s):  
Colon Cancer ◽  
Overall Survival ◽  
Adjuvant Chemotherapy ◽  
Meta Analysis ◽  
Disease Free Survival ◽  
Stage Ii ◽  
Cochrane Systematic Review ◽  
Free Survival ◽  
Stage Ii Colon Cancer ◽  
Disease Free

3548 Background: Colon cancer is potentially curable by surgery in the early stages of the disease. Adjuvant chemotherapy improves disease-free and overall survival in patients with stage III disease, but the magnitude of benefit in stage II colon cancer is less clear. A previous Cochrane systematic review and meta-analysis (SR/MA) found improved disease-free, but not overall survival (Figueredo et al., 2008). An updated SR/MA was performed to determine the effects of adjuvant chemotherapy on disease-free and overall survival in patients with stage II colon cancer. Methods: Relevant databases (MEDLINE, EMBASE, and Cochrane) were independently searched by all authors, using the same search strategy employed in the original study (1/1988 to 9/2012). Randomized trials containing data on stage II colon cancer patients undergoing adjuvant 5-fluorouracil (5FU) chemotherapy versus observation were included. Pooled results were expressed as hazard ratios (HR) whenever possible, or risk ratios (RR), with 95% confidence intervals (95%CI) using a random effects model. Results: Seven studies were identified, and included in the final SR/MA. Six of the 7 studies were included in the disease-free survival analysis (n=4587). Adjuvant 5FU was associated with better disease-free survival (RR 0.84 (95%CI 0.75-0.94)). All 7 studies (n=5353) were included in the overall survival analysis showing an improvement with adjuvant 5FU (HR 0.87 (95%CI 0.78-0.97)). There was no evidence of heterogeneity across the studies (I2 = 0% for all analyses). Conclusions: In stage II colon cancer, adjuvant 5FU chemotherapy statistically improves both disease-free and overall survival. Our SR/MA demonstrates, for the first time, an overall survival advantage with adjuvant chemotherapy in stage II colon cancer.

Impact of pathologic complete response to preoperative docetaxel-based chemotherapy on disease-free survival in esophagogastric adenocarcinoma.

2013 ◽  
Vol 31 (4_suppl) ◽  
pp. 123-123
Author(s):  
Sylvie Lorenzen ◽  
Nils Homann ◽  
Salah-Eddin Al-Batran ◽  
Florian Lordick ◽  
Tibor Schuster ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Pathologic Complete Response ◽  
Disease Free Survival ◽  
Complete Response ◽  
Clinicopathological Parameters ◽  
Tumor Type ◽  
Disease Specific Survival ◽  
Free Survival ◽  
The Impact ◽  
Disease Free ◽  
Disease Specific

123 Background: The aim of this study was to evaluate the impact of pathologic complete response (pCR) on outcome in patients with gastric or esophagogastric junction (EGJ) adenocarcinoma after treatment with preoperative docetaxel/platin /fluoropyrimidine based chemotherapy. Methods: This analysis of a prospective database identified patients who received at least one cycle of preoperative docetaxel/platin/fluoropyrimidine-based chemotherapy for at least T3/4 and N+ disease. An association of pretreatment clinicopathologic factors and pCR was investigated. Overall survival, disease-free survival and disease-specific survival were analyzed according to the achievement of a pCR. Results: A total of 120 patients received preoperative docetaxel-based chemotherapy and underwent subsequent resection of the primary tumor. 15 pts (13%) had distant metastases (M1) at initial diagnosis. 18 patients achieved a pCR in the primary (15%). Median follow-up was 41.1months. The median DFS and OS for the whole population was 24.1 and 48.6 months, respectively. DFS was significantly prolonged in pCR compared to non-pCR patients (HR 2.65, 95% CI 1.1- to 6.2; 3-year DFS probability: 71.8%±10.7 and 37.7%±5.1, respectively, P-value log-rank test=0.018). For patients with a pCR the median DFS was not reached and for those without pCR the median DFS was 22.1 months. Patients with a pCR showed an almost 50% decreased risk of death compared to non-pCR patients (HR 0.53; 95%CI 0.23 to 1.23; P=0.131). Disease-specific survival (DSS) was significantly longer in pCR vs. non-pCR patients (HR 0.188, 95%CI 0.046-to 0.77; P= 0.021). Two clinicopathological parameters were identified as predictors of pCR: tumor localization in the EGJ (p=0.019) and intestinal tumor type according to Laurén’s classification (p=0.042). Conclusions: The analysis confirms that pCR to neoadjuvant chemotherapy is a predictor of favourable patient outcome in patients with gastric or EGJ adenocarcinoma. Tumor location in the EGJ and intestinal histology represent factors significantly associated with the achievement of pCR.

Identification of risk factors for stage II colon cancer.

2013 ◽  
Vol 31 (4_suppl) ◽  
pp. 375-375
Author(s):  
Sho Sawazaki ◽  
Manabu Shiozawa ◽  
Koji Numata ◽  
Masakatsu Numata ◽  
Teni Godai ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Colon Cancer ◽  
High Risk ◽  
Disease Free Survival ◽  
Lymphatic Invasion ◽  
Clinicopathological Features ◽  
Stage Ii ◽  
Tumor Diameter ◽  
Free Survival ◽  
Stage Ii Colon Cancer ◽  
Disease Free

375 Background: The use of adjuvant chemotherapy remains controversial in Stage II colon cancer. However, patients with specific clinicopathological features are thought to have high risk for recurrence. The aim of this study was to identify the subgroup of patients at great risk, by investigating the clinicopathological features associated with poor survived in Stage II. Methods: A total of 282 patients with Stage II colon cancer who underwent curative resection from January 1990 to September 2007 at Kanagawa Cancer Center were enrolled. Then, the clinicopathological data of the patients were retrospectively evaluated. Disease-free survival rates were calculated by the Kaplan-Meier method, and survival curves were compared by the log-rank test. Cox’s regression analysis was used for multivariate analyses. P values <0.05 were considered to be statistically significant. Results: The median follow up was 62.5 months. The 5-year disease-free survival was 92.2% in the study group as a whole. Among the recurrent patients (n=23), the most recurrent site was the liver (n=11, 44%), followed by lung (n=6, 24%), and peritoneum (n=5, 20%). Univariate analysis for 5-year disease-free survival identified two factors; tumor diameter (>5cm vs…5cm, p=0.018), and lymphatic invasion (p=0.009). Multivariate analysis for 5-year disease-free survival identified two independent factors; tumor diameter (hazard ratio [HR], 4.82; 95% CI, 1.55-15.0; p=0.006), and lymphatic invasion (HR, 4.15; 95% CI, 1.68-10.2; p=0.002). The 5-year disease-free survival differed significantly among patients with neither of these prognostic factors (98.6%), those with only 1 factor (93.3%), and those with 2 factors (76.6%, p=0.000). Conclusions: Patients with stage II colon cancer who have both 5cm in diameter and lymphatic invasion are at high risk for recurrence. The use of adjuvant chemotherapy should be considered in this subgroup of patients.

Adjuvant Therapy for Stage II Colon Cancer: A Systematic Review From the Cancer Care Ontario Program in Evidence-Based Care’s Gastrointestinal Cancer Disease Site Group

2004 ◽  
Vol 22 (16) ◽  
pp. 3395-3407 ◽  
Author(s):  
Alvaro Figueredo ◽  
Manya L. Charette ◽  
Jean Maroun ◽  
Melissa C. Brouwers ◽  
Lisa Zuraw
Keyword(s):  
Systematic Review ◽  
Colon Cancer ◽  
Overall Survival ◽  
Adjuvant Therapy ◽  
Meta Analysis ◽  
Disease Free Survival ◽  
Stage Ii ◽  
Free Survival ◽  
Stage Ii Colon Cancer ◽  
Disease Free

Purpose To develop a systematic review that would address the following question: Should patients with stage II colon cancer receive adjuvant therapy? Methods A systematic review was undertaken to locate randomized controlled trials comparing adjuvant therapy to observation. Results Thirty-seven trials and 11 meta-analyses were included. The evidence for stage II colon cancer comes primarily from a trial of fluorouracil plus levamisole and a meta-analysis of 1,016 patients comparing fluorouracil plus folinic acid versus observation. Neither detected an improvement in disease-free or overall survival for adjuvant therapy. A recent pooled analysis of data from seven trials observed a benefit for adjuvant therapy in a multivariate analysis for both disease-free and overall survival. The disease-free survival benefits appeared to extend to stage II patients; however, no P values were provided. A meta-analysis of chemotherapy by portal vein infusion has also shown a benefit in disease-free and overall survival for stage II patients. A meta-analysis was conducted using data on stage II patients where data were available (n = 4,187). The mortality risk ratio was 0.87 (95% CI, 0.75 to 1.01; P = .07). Conclusion There is preliminary evidence indicating that adjuvant therapy is associated with a disease-free survival benefit for patients with stage II colon cancer. These benefits are small and not necessarily associated with improved overall survival. Patients should be made aware of these results and encouraged to participate in active clinical trials. Additional investigation of newer therapies and more mature data from the presently available trials should be pursued.

scholarly journals High levels of microRNA-21 in the stroma of colorectal cancers predict short disease-free survival in stage II colon cancer patients

2010 ◽  
Vol 28 (1) ◽  
pp. 27-38 ◽  
Author(s):  
Boye Schnack Nielsen ◽  
Stine Jørgensen ◽  
Jacob Ulrik Fog ◽  
Rolf Søkilde ◽  
Ib Jarle Christensen ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Colon Cancer ◽  
Cancer Patients ◽  
Disease Free Survival ◽  
Stage Ii ◽  
Colorectal Cancers ◽  
Free Survival ◽  
Stage Ii Colon Cancer ◽  
Disease Free ◽  
Short Disease Free Survival

scholarly journals Prognostic Impact of Tumor Length in Esophageal Cancer: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis

2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Zhao Yang Wang ◽  
Yuanzhu Jiang ◽  
Wen Xiao ◽  
Xianbiao Xue ◽  
Xiangwei Zhang ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Overall Survival ◽  
Meta Analysis ◽  
Disease Free Survival ◽  
Progression Free Survival ◽  
Disease Specific Survival ◽  
Cancer Specific Survival ◽  
Free Survival ◽  
Tumor Length ◽  
Disease Free ◽  
Disease Specific

Abstract Background: In clinical work, it has been increasingly found that the prognosis is still very different even for esophageal cancer (EC) patients with the same TNM stage. Tumor length has been analysed as a possible independent prognostic factor in many studies, but no unanimous conclusion has been reached. Therefore, this review used a meta-analysis to evaluate the association between tumor length and prognosis in EC patients.Methods: A systematic search for relevant articles was performed in PubMed, Web of Science, and Embase. Hazard ratios (HRs) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were used as effective measures to estimate the correlation between tumor length and prognosis, including overall survival, disease-free survival, progression-free survival, disease-specific survival, and cancer-specific survival. STATA 15.0 software was used to perform the meta-analysis and the data synthesis.Results: Finally, 41 articles with 28,973 patients were included in our study. The comprehensive statistical results showed that long tumors are an independent prognostic parameter associated with poor overall survival (OS) (HR=1.30; 95% CI: 1.21-1.40, p<.001) and disease-free survival (DFS) (HR=1.38; 95% CI: 1.18-1.61, p<.001) in EC patients. Subgroup analyses also suggested a significant correlation between long tumors and poor OS. Sensitivity analysis and publication bias evaluation confirmed the reliability and stability of the results. Similar results were obtained in the analyses of progression-free survival (PFS), disease-specific survival (DSS), and cancer-specific survival (CSS).Conclusion: The results of this meta-analysis showed that long tumors were related to poor OS, DFS, PFS, DSS and CSS in EC patients. Tumor length might be an important predictor of prognosis in EC patients, and it can be used as an independent staging index. Further well-designed and large-scale prospective clinical studies are needed to confirm these findings.

scholarly journals Prognostic Value of Lymph Node Density in Patients With T3 and T4 Pyriform Sinus Carcinoma

2020 ◽  
Vol 19 ◽  
pp. 153303382094580
Author(s):  
Lifeng Jia ◽  
Jingya Li ◽  
Ziyuan Zhou ◽  
Wei Yuan
Keyword(s):  
Lymph Node ◽  
Disease Free Survival ◽  
Pyriform Sinus ◽  
Recurrence Free Survival ◽  
Disease Specific Survival ◽  
Node Density ◽  
Free Survival ◽  
Lymph Node Density ◽  
Disease Free ◽  
Disease Specific

Background/Aim: Lymph node density is a parameter used to more accurately predict tumor recurrence and patient survival. However, its association with surgical outcome in pyriform sinus carcinoma remains unclear. The purpose of this study was to assess the prognostic value of lymph node density in advanced pyriform sinus carcinoma. Patients and Methods: A total of 87 patients with pyriform sinus carcinoma treated between 2008 and 2015 were enrolled. Then, 5-year overall survival, 5-year disease-specific survival, 5-year disease-free survival, and 5-year regional recurrence-free survival were utilized to assess the prognostic significance of lymph node density. Results: With a median follow-up period of 31.8 months, 5-year overall survival, disease-specific survival, disease-free survival, and regional recurrence-free survival were 37.9%, 46.0%, 41.4%, and 54.0%, respectively. Univariate analysis revealed that lymph node density ≥ 0.093 was a significant predictor of poor 5-year overall survival ( P = .005), disease-specific survival ( P = .008), disease-free survival ( P = .0013), and regional recurrence-free survival ( P = .003). Furthermore, multivariate analysis demonstrated that lymph node density was negatively associated with adverse 5-year overall survival (hazard ratio = 1.62, 95% CI: 1.15-2.29, P = .006), disease-specific survival (hazard ratio = 1.86, 95% CI: 1.24-2.80, P = .003), disease-free survival (hazard ratio = 0.45, 95% CI: 0.24-0.85, P = .014), and regional recurrence-free survival (hazard ratio = 2.97, 95% CI: 1.43-6.17, P = .004). Conclusion: Taken together, these results reveal that lymph node density is a powerful prognostic factor for patients with T3 and T4 pyriform sinus carcinoma, and the median lymph node density cutoff values ≥ 0.093 are associated with a greater risk of recurrence and poorer survival.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document