Dynamic monitoring of HER2 amplification in circulating DNA of patients with metastatic colorectal cancer treated with cetuximab

2019 ◽  
Vol 22 (6) ◽  
pp. 928-934 ◽  
Author(s):  
R. Liu ◽  
X. Zhao ◽  
W. Guo ◽  
M. Huang ◽  
L. Qiu ◽  
...  
2018 ◽  
Vol 36 (4_suppl) ◽  
pp. 714-714
Author(s):  
Zhi-Yu Chen ◽  
Rujiao Liu ◽  
Weijian Guo ◽  
Xiaodong Zhu ◽  
Xiaoying Zhao ◽  
...  

714 Background: Addition of cetuximab has shown clinical benefit in RAS and BRAF wild-type (wt) patients with metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC). Human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 ( HER2) amplification was reported to be one of the resistance mechanisms to cetuximab. We investigated whether monitoring of HER2 amplification in circulating DNA allows early detection of progression and informs about resistance to cetuximab. Methods: We analyzed HER2 amplification in circulating DNA by 8 week-interval using droplet digital polymerase chain reaction (ddPCR) from 30 RAS and BRAF wt patients, who progressed after failure of cetuximab-containing regimens between Jul 2015 and Jun 2017. Results: 16.7% (5/30) of patients exhibited dynamic fluctuations of HER2 amplification in plasma, one of whom was found to be positive for HER2 amplification in matched tumor tissue sample using FISH. Two patients had HER2 and c-MET co-amplification. All 5 primary sites were left side, 4 rectums and 1 descending colon. 3 patients received cetuximab as first line therapy, whereas 2 patients in the 2nd line setting. Among these 5 patients, changes in circulating DNA levels showed good agreement with changes in tumor volume. Furthermore, quantifications of HER2 amplification showed obvious increase with an average lead time of 2 months compared with CT documented progress. But interestingly, there was no difference in progression-free survival (PFS) between these 5 patients and the others without HER2 amplification (p > 0.05). Conclusions: Plasma HER2 amplification detected by ddPCR was showed dynamic changing over time and would predict resistance to cetuximab-containing treatment. Average 2 months lead time was observed and need to validate in the further study.


2016 ◽  
Vol 27 ◽  
pp. vi172 ◽  
Author(s):  
J. Jeong ◽  
J. Kim ◽  
Y.S. Hong ◽  
D. Kim ◽  
J.E. Kim ◽  
...  

2018 ◽  
Vol 17 (3) ◽  
pp. 198-205 ◽  
Author(s):  
Kentaro Sawada ◽  
Yoshiaki Nakamura ◽  
Takeharu Yamanaka ◽  
Yasutoshi Kuboki ◽  
Daisuke Yamaguchi ◽  
...  

2014 ◽  
Vol 25 ◽  
pp. iv559
Author(s):  
D. Sefrioui ◽  
C. Vasseur ◽  
R. Sesboué ◽  
F. Blanchard ◽  
A. Gangloff ◽  
...  

2018 ◽  
Vol 36 (4_suppl) ◽  
pp. 642-642
Author(s):  
Kentaro Sawada ◽  
Wataru Okamoto ◽  
Yoshiaki Nakamura ◽  
Takeharu Yamanaka ◽  
Satoshi Yuki ◽  
...  

642 Background: HER2 amplifications have been observed in approximately 3% of patients (pts) with metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC). Early clinical trials with combined HER2-targeted therapies showed promising activities. However, it remains unclear whether HER2 amplification in mCRC is as prognostic as RAS or BRAF V600E mutant (mt). We aimed to evaluate survival outcome for mCRC pts with HER2 amplification compared to those with RAS or BRAF mt. Methods: mCRC pts who received a palliative resection of the primary tumor with metastatic diseases at presentation, or recurred after curative resection of the primary tumor between 2005 and 2015, were analyzed. HER2 immunohistochemistry (IHC) was performed using formalin-fixed and paraffin-embedded (FFPE) sections obtained from the primary tumor, and HER2 amplification was confirmed by fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH) in case of IHC 2+ or 3+. Criteria for HER2 amplification were a HER2- to CEP17- signal ratio of 2.0 or higher. RAS / BRAF status was centrally assessed by a PCR-based method. The pts were classified into four subgroups based on RAS, BRAF and HER2 status: Group R , RAS mt; Group B, BRAF V600E mt; Group H, HER2 amplification with RAS / BRAF wild-type (wt); and Group W, RAS / BRAF wt. Results: Among 370 pts, 359 pts (97%) were successfully analyzed. A total of 15 pts (4%) had HER2 amplifications, out of which four pts had overlapped RAS mt (subclassified as Group R). RAS or BRAF mutations are mutually exclusive. The number in Group R, B, H and W was 204 (57%), 13 (4%), 11 (3%) and 131 (36%), respectively. There was no remarkable difference in baseline characteristics among groups. With a median follow-up time of 63 months (mos), the median overall survival of the 359 pts was 27 mos (95%CI 24 - 29 mos); Group R, 24 mos; Group B, 14 mos; Group H, 20 mos; and Group W, 39 mos. The HR of R vs. H is 0.83 (95%CI 0.41-1.70, p= 0.618), B vs. H is 1.16 (95%CI 0.47-2.84, p= 0.748), and W vs. H is 0.52 (95%CI 0.25-1.08, p= 0.080), respectively. Conclusions: This study suggests that the prognosis of mCRC pts with HER2 amplification tends to be worse as compared to those with RAS / BRAF wt, similar to those with RAS mt, and better than those with BRAF mt, although these comparisons were not statistical significant.


2017 ◽  
Vol 16 (3) ◽  
pp. e147-e152 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jae Ho Jeong ◽  
Jihun Kim ◽  
Yong Sang Hong ◽  
Dalyong Kim ◽  
Jeong Eun Kim ◽  
...  

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document