scholarly journals Clinical Interest of Digital Pcr for Routine Detection of Circulating Dna in Metastatic Colorectal Cancer

2014 ◽  
Vol 25 ◽  
pp. iv559
Author(s):  
D. Sefrioui ◽  
C. Vasseur ◽  
R. Sesboué ◽  
F. Blanchard ◽  
A. Gangloff ◽  
...  
2015 ◽  
Vol 47 (10) ◽  
pp. 884-890 ◽  
Author(s):  
David Sefrioui ◽  
Nasrin Sarafan-Vasseur ◽  
Ludivine Beaussire ◽  
Marina Baretti ◽  
Alice Gangloff ◽  
...  

2021 ◽  
Vol 14 (2) ◽  
pp. 128
Author(s):  
Silvia Galbiati ◽  
Francesco Damin ◽  
Dario Brambilla ◽  
Lucia Ferraro ◽  
Nadia Soriani ◽  
...  

It is widely accepted that assessing circular tumor DNA (ctDNA) in the plasma of cancer patients is a promising practice to evaluate somatic mutations from solid tumors noninvasively. Recently, it was reported that isolation of extracellular vesicles improves the detection of mutant DNA from plasma in metastatic patients; however, no consensus on the presence of dsDNA in exosomes has been reached yet. We analyzed small extracellular vesicle (sEV)-associated DNA of eleven metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC) patients and compared the results obtained by microarray and droplet digital PCR (ddPCR) to those reported on the ctDNA fraction. We detected the same mutations found in tissue biopsies and ctDNA in all samples but, unexpectedly, in one sample, we found a KRAS mutation that was not identified either in ctDNA or tissue biopsy. Furthermore, to assess the exact location of sEV-associated DNA (outside or inside the vesicle), we treated with DNase I sEVs isolated with three different methodologies. We found that the DNA inside the vesicles is only a small fraction of that surrounding the vesicles. Its amount seems to correlate with the total amount of circulating tumor DNA. The results obtained in our experimental setting suggest that integrating ctDNA and sEV-associated DNA in mCRC patient management could provide a complete real-time assessment of the cancer mutation status.


2018 ◽  
Vol 29 ◽  
pp. viii181 ◽  
Author(s):  
E. Van Cutsem ◽  
K. Lesniewski-Kmak ◽  
M.P. Saunders ◽  
H. Wasan ◽  
G. Argiles ◽  
...  

PLoS ONE ◽  
2020 ◽  
Vol 15 (11) ◽  
pp. e0239819
Author(s):  
Matilda Holm ◽  
Emma Andersson ◽  
Emerik Osterlund ◽  
Ali Ovissi ◽  
Leena-Maija Soveri ◽  
...  

Circulating tumor DNA (ctDNA) is released from cancer cells and oncogenic mutations in ctDNA can be measured from plasma samples. Droplet digital PCR (ddPCR) is a sensitive and specific method for the detection of mutations in ctDNA. We analyzed serial plasma samples (n = 80) from ten metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC) patients with a known KRAS mutation in their primary tumor. The patients were undergoing oncological treatment with bevacizumab in combination with alternating capecitabine and oxaliplatin or irinotecan. Baseline ddPCR KRAS mutation allele frequency (MAF) values ranged from 0% to 63%. The first radiologic response evaluation criteria in solid tumors (RECIST) evaluation was performed 45–63 days after the initiation of treatment, and by this time three patients had an undetectable level of KRAS mutation, one had a MAF value of 0.5%, and one had a MAF value of 3% that had been reduced by 95% from the baseline value. In three of these patients the RECIST assessment was stable disease and in two partial response. In seven patients, ddPCR MAF values increased before radiological disease progression or death, while one patient remained disease-free with an undetectable KRAS mutation level. Next, we analyzed all available plasma samples with the Idylla ctKRAS system (n = 60), and found that the overall degree of agreement between ddPCR and Idylla was almost perfect (kappa value = 0.860). We used next-generation sequencing (NGS) to detect treatment-induced mutations in the last serial plasma sample of each patient, but were unable to find any new mutations when compared to the primary tumor. This study shows that ddPCR and Idylla are equally efficient for the detection of KRAS mutations in the liquid biopsies from mCRC patients and that ctDNA may indicate the disappearance of treatment responsive KRAS positive mCRC clones and serve as an early sign of disease progression.


2020 ◽  
Vol 21 (1) ◽  
pp. 1-1
Author(s):  
Elena Lastraioli ◽  
Lorenzo Antonuzzo ◽  
Beatrice Fantechi ◽  
Luisa Di Cerbo ◽  
Alessandro Di Costanzo ◽  
...  

2014 ◽  
Vol 25 ◽  
pp. iv560 ◽  
Author(s):  
J.L. García ◽  
I. Matos ◽  
R. Lozano Mejorada ◽  
E. Fonseca ◽  
R. Benito ◽  
...  

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document