Comparison of postoperative complication rates between a novel endoluminal balloon-assisted drainage and diverting stoma after low rectal cancer

2022 ◽  
Author(s):  
W. Liang ◽  
H. Jie ◽  
Z. Zeng ◽  
S. Luo ◽  
Z. Liu ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Rectal Cancer ◽  
Postoperative Complication ◽  
Low Rectal Cancer ◽  
Complication Rates ◽  
Diverting Stoma

scholarly journals Comparation of Laparoscopic Intersphincteric Resection and Abdominoperineal Resection for Ultra-Low Rectal Cancer Patients - a Retrospective Analysis, and a Meta-analysis of Oncology Outcome

2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Xianwei Mo ◽  
Wentao Wang ◽  
Haiquan Qin ◽  
Hao Lai ◽  
Zigao Huang ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Rectal Cancer ◽  
Survival Rate ◽  
Retrospective Analysis ◽  
Cancer Patients ◽  
Abdominoperineal Resection ◽  
Meta Analysis ◽  
Intersphincteric Resection ◽  
Low Rectal Cancer ◽  
Complication Rates ◽  
Laparoscopic Intersphincteric Resection

Abstract Purpose The aim of the study is to evaluate the surgical and oncology outcomes between laparoscopic Intersphincteric Resection (LISR) and laparoscopic-assisted Abdominoperineal Resection (LARC) for ultra-low rectal cancer patients by using a retrospective analysis, and a meta-analysis of the literature was carried out to further validate the oncology outcome. Patients and methods: Between April 2014 and December 2015, a total of 38 rectal cancer patients who underwent LISR and 41 LARC patients were enrolled in this study. The comparison between the groups was based on clinicopathological characteristics and surgical outcomes. Meta-analysis of published studies, exploring oncology outcome of between LISR and LARC, was carried out using STATA 12.0 software. Results Operating time, blood loss, length of hospital stay, and postoperative complication rates was similar between LISR group and LARC group; Patients undergoing LISR also had a similarly 5-year local recurrence and overall survival rate with LAPR. Meta-analysis showed that five studies, which included a total of 791 patients were final involved for this analysis. Comparing APR, ISR patients obtain similarly 5-years recurrence rate and 5-years survival rate. Conclusion This study suggests that LISR is as technically feasible, safe, and effective as LARC for treating patients with low rectal cancer. Additional high-powered randomized trials are needed to determine whether LISR truly offers any advantages.

scholarly journals Risk factor for permanent stoma and incontinence quality of life after sphincter-preserving surgery for low rectal cancer without a diverting stoma

2017 ◽  
Vol 2 (1) ◽  
pp. 79-86 ◽  
Author(s):  
Takuya Miura ◽  
Yoshiyuki Sakamoto ◽  
Hajime Morohashi ◽  
Tatsuya Yoshida ◽  
Kentaro Sato ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Quality Of Life ◽  
Rectal Cancer ◽  
Risk Factor ◽  
Low Rectal Cancer ◽  
Permanent Stoma ◽  
Diverting Stoma

scholarly journals A Case of Low Rectal Cancer Avoiding a Diverting Stoma Using the Pull Through Procedure with Delayed Coloanal Anastomosis

2020 ◽  
Vol 81 (9) ◽  
pp. 1857-1861
Author(s):  
Jun KAWASHIMA ◽  
Kanechika DEN ◽  
Shigeru YAMAGISHI ◽  
Kei ITO ◽  
Yuta MINAMI ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Rectal Cancer ◽  
Coloanal Anastomosis ◽  
Low Rectal Cancer ◽  
Diverting Stoma ◽  
Pull Through

Verbesserung der Behandlungsstrategie für Low Rectal Cancer: Ergebnisse der prospektiven MERCURY II Studie

2014 ◽  
Vol 52 (08) ◽  
Author(s):  
S Stelzner ◽  
J Straßburg ◽  
N Battersby ◽  
P How ◽  
N West ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Rectal Cancer ◽  
Low Rectal Cancer

OUTCOME OF SPHINCTER PRESERVING RECTAL RESECTION FOR LOW RECTAL CANCER

2017 ◽  
pp. 36-40
Author(s):  
Vinh Quy Truong ◽  
Anh Vu Pham ◽  
Quang Thuu Le
Keyword(s):  
Rectal Cancer ◽  
Functional Outcomes ◽  
Low Anterior Resection ◽  
Rectal Resection ◽  
Anal Verge ◽  
Low Rectal Cancer ◽  
Central Hospital ◽  
Mesorectal Excision ◽  
Pull Through ◽  
Stage T1

Purpose: To evaluate the functional outcome of sphincter-preserving rectal resection for low rectal cancer. Materials and Methods: From April 2009 to January 2016, there are 52 patients who underwent sphincter-preserving rectal resection with total mesorectal excision with low rectal cancer (<6cm from the anal verge) at Hue Central Hospital, Hue, Vietnam. Results: the average age 62.7 ± 12.8, the distance of tumor from anal verge include four group (≤ 3cm 1.9%; 3 to ≤ 4cm 17.3%; 4 to ≤ 5cm 34.6%; > 5 cm). T stage T1/ T2/T3: 1.9%/28.8%/69.2%. The following time is 33.8 ± 18.9 month. Overall recurrence was 13/18(27.1%), local recurrence was 5 (10.4%). Total survival was 40.5 ± 2.9 month. Technique: intersphincteric preservation 14 (26.9%), low anterior resection 17 (32.7%) and pull-through procedure 21 (40.4%). The distance of anatomosis from anal verge: from 1 to ≤ 2 cm:14 (26.9%); from 2 to ≤ 3cm: 21 (40.4%); from 3 to ≤ 4 cm: 17 (32.7%). Bowels movement of 3 month: 4.7 ± 3.2 and 12th month: 2.7 ± 1.6 (p< 0.01). Conclusions: Sphincterpreserving rectal resection using may provide a good continence and oncologic safety. The patients are acceptable with the results of functional outcomes. Key words: Low rectal cancer, sphincter-preserving

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document