Deriving the three-dimensional structure of ZnO nanowires/nanobelts by scanning transmission electron microscope tomography

Nano Research ◽  
2013 ◽  
Vol 6 (4) ◽  
pp. 253-262 ◽  
Author(s):  
Yong Ding ◽  
Fang Zhang ◽  
Zhong Lin Wang
2016 ◽  
Vol 22 (3) ◽  
pp. 679-689 ◽  
Author(s):  
Charles Austin Wade ◽  
Mark J. McLean ◽  
Richard P. Vinci ◽  
Masashi Watanabe

AbstractScanning transmission electron microscope (STEM) through-focus imaging (TFI) has been used to determine the three-dimensional atomic structure of Bi segregation-induced brittle Cu grain boundaries (GBs). With TFI, it is possible to observe single Bi atom distributions along Cu [001] twist GBs using an aberration-corrected STEM operating at 200 kV. The depth resolution is ~5 nm. Specimens with GBs intentionally inclined with respect to the microscope’s optic axis were used to investigate Bi segregant atom distributions along and through the Cu GB. It was found that Bi atoms exist at most once per Cu unit cell along the GB, meaning that no continuous GB film is present. Therefore, the reduced fracture toughness of this particular Bi-doped Cu boundary would not be caused by fracture of Bi–Bi bonds.


Author(s):  
G. Behan ◽  
E. C. Cosgriff ◽  
Angus I. Kirkland ◽  
Peter D. Nellist

The depth resolution for optical sectioning in the scanning transmission electron microscope is measured using the results of optical sectioning experiments of laterally extended objects. We show that the depth resolution depends on the numerical aperture of the objective lens as expected. We also find, however, that the depth resolution depends on the lateral extent of the object that is being imaged owing to a missing cone of information in the transfer function. We find that deconvolution methods generally have limited usefulness in this case, but that three-dimensional information can still be obtained with the aid of prior information for specific samples such as those consisting of supported nanoparticles. We go on to review how a confocal geometry may improve the depth resolution for extended objects. Finally, we present a review of recent work exploring the effect of dynamical diffraction in zone-axis-aligned crystals on the optical sectioning process.


Author(s):  
J. R. Fields

The energy analysis of electrons scattered by a specimen in a scanning transmission electron microscope can improve contrast as well as aid in chemical identification. In so far as energy analysis is useful, one would like to be able to design a spectrometer which is tailored to his particular needs. In our own case, we require a spectrometer which will accept a parallel incident beam and which will focus the electrons in both the median and perpendicular planes. In addition, since we intend to follow the spectrometer by a detector array rather than a single energy selecting slit, we need as great a dispersion as possible. Therefore, we would like to follow our spectrometer by a magnifying lens. Consequently, the line along which electrons of varying energy are dispersed must be normal to the direction of the central ray at the spectrometer exit.


Author(s):  
M. G. R. Thomson

The variation of contrast and signal to noise ratio with change in detector solid angle in the high resolution scanning transmission electron microscope was discussed in an earlier paper. In that paper the conclusions were that the most favourable conditions for the imaging of isolated single heavy atoms were, using the notation in figure 1, either bright field phase contrast with β0⋍0.5 α0, or dark field with an annular detector subtending an angle between ao and effectively π/2.The microscope is represented simply by the model illustrated in figure 1, and the objective lens is characterised by its coefficient of spherical aberration Cs. All the results for the Scanning Transmission Electron Microscope (STEM) may with care be applied to the Conventional Electron Microscope (CEM). The object atom is represented as detailed in reference 2, except that ϕ(θ) is taken to be the constant ϕ(0) to simplify the integration. This is reasonable for θ ≤ 0.1 θ0, where 60 is the screening angle.


2009 ◽  
Vol 15 (S2) ◽  
pp. 642-643
Author(s):  
M Bolorizadeh ◽  
HF Hess

Extended abstract of a paper presented at Microscopy and Microanalysis 2009 in Richmond, Virginia, USA, July 26 – July 30, 2009


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document