Multinational development and validation of an early prediction model for delirium in ICU patients1)

2016 ◽  
Vol 14 (4) ◽  
pp. 14-15
Author(s):  
Willemke Stilma
2015 ◽  
Vol 41 (6) ◽  
pp. 1048-1056 ◽  
Author(s):  
A. Wassenaar ◽  
M. van den Boogaard ◽  
T. van Achterberg ◽  
A. J. C. Slooter ◽  
M. A. Kuiper ◽  
...  

2018 ◽  
Vol 35 (6) ◽  
pp. 595-605 ◽  
Author(s):  
Esther Witteveen ◽  
Luuk Wieske ◽  
Juultje Sommers ◽  
Jan-Jaap Spijkstra ◽  
Monique C. de Waard ◽  
...  

Objectives: An early diagnosis of intensive care unit–acquired weakness (ICU-AW) is often not possible due to impaired consciousness. To avoid a diagnostic delay, we previously developed a prediction model, based on single-center data from 212 patients (development cohort), to predict ICU-AW at 2 days after ICU admission. The objective of this study was to investigate the external validity of the original prediction model in a new, multicenter cohort and, if necessary, to update the model. Methods: Newly admitted ICU patients who were mechanically ventilated at 48 hours after ICU admission were included. Predictors were prospectively recorded, and the outcome ICU-AW was defined by an average Medical Research Council score <4. In the validation cohort, consisting of 349 patients, we analyzed performance of the original prediction model by assessment of calibration and discrimination. Additionally, we updated the model in this validation cohort. Finally, we evaluated a new prediction model based on all patients of the development and validation cohort. Results: Of 349 analyzed patients in the validation cohort, 190 (54%) developed ICU-AW. Both model calibration and discrimination of the original model were poor in the validation cohort. The area under the receiver operating characteristics curve (AUC-ROC) was 0.60 (95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.54-0.66). Model updating methods improved calibration but not discrimination. The new prediction model, based on all patients of the development and validation cohort (total of 536 patients) had a fair discrimination, AUC-ROC: 0.70 (95% CI: 0.66-0.75). Conclusions: The previously developed prediction model for ICU-AW showed poor performance in a new independent multicenter validation cohort. Model updating methods improved calibration but not discrimination. The newly derived prediction model showed fair discrimination. This indicates that early prediction of ICU-AW is still challenging and needs further attention.


2021 ◽  
Vol 24 ◽  
pp. 157-166
Author(s):  
Wilailuck Tuntayothin ◽  
Stephen John Kerr ◽  
Chanchana Boonyakrai ◽  
Suwasin Udomkarnjananun ◽  
Sumitra Chukaew ◽  
...  

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Nikolaos Mastellos ◽  
Richard Betteridge ◽  
Prasanth Peddaayyavarla ◽  
Andrew Moran ◽  
Jurgita Kaubryte ◽  
...  

BACKGROUND The impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on health care utilisation and associated costs has been significant, with one in ten patients becoming severely ill and being admitted to hospital with serious complications during the first wave of the pandemic. Risk prediction models can help health care providers identify high-risk patients in their populations and intervene to improve health outcomes and reduce associated costs. OBJECTIVE To develop and validate a hospitalisation risk prediction model for adult patients with laboratory confirmed Severe Acute Respiratory Syndrome Coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2). METHODS The model was developed using pre-linked and standardised data of adult patients with laboratory confirmed SARS-CoV-2 from Cerner’s population health management platform (HealtheIntent®) in the London Borough of Lewisham. A total of 14,203 patients who tested positive for SARS-CoV-2 between 1st March 2020 and 28th February 2021 were included in the development and internal validation cohorts. A second temporal validation cohort covered the period between 1st March 2021 to 30th April 2021. The outcome variable was hospital admission in adult patients with laboratory confirmed SARS-CoV-2. A generalised linear model was used to train the model. The predictive performance of the model was assessed using the area under the receiver operator characteristic curve (ROC-AUC). RESULTS Overall, 14,203 patients were included. Of those, 9,755 (68.7%) were assigned to the development cohort, 2,438 (17.2%) to the internal validation cohort, and 2,010 (14.1%) to the temporal validation cohort. A total of 917 (9.4%) patients were admitted to hospital in the development cohort, 210 (8.6%) in the internal validation cohort, and a further 204 (10.1%) in the temporal validation cohort. The model had a ROC-AUC of 0.85 in both the development and validation cohorts. The most predictive factors were older age, male sex, Asian or Other ethnic minority background, obesity, chronic kidney disease, hypertension and diabetes. CONCLUSIONS The COVID-19 hospitalisation risk prediction model demonstrated very good performance and can be used to stratify risk in the Lewisham population to help providers reduce unnecessary hospital admissions and associated costs, improve patient outcomes, and target those at greatest risk to ensure full vaccination against SARS-CoV-2. Further research may examine the external validity of the model in other populations.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document