scholarly journals Clinical profile and contemporary management of patients with heart failure with preserved ejection fraction: results from the CHECK-HF registry

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
A. Uijl ◽  
J. F. Veenis ◽  
H. P. Brunner-La Rocca ◽  
V. van Empel ◽  
G. C. M. Linssen ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Heart Failure ◽  
Ejection Fraction ◽  
Beta Blockers ◽  
Heart Association ◽  
Left Ventricular ◽  
Left Ventricular Ejection ◽  
Preserved Ejection Fraction ◽  
Current Management ◽  
Ventricular Ejection Fraction ◽  
Ras Inhibitors

Abstract Background Clinical management of heart failure with preserved ejection fraction (HFpEF) centres on treating comorbidities and is likely to vary between countries. Thus, to provide insight into the current management of HFpEF, studies from multiple countries are required. We evaluated the clinical profiles and current management of patients with HFpEF in the Netherlands. Methods We included 2153 patients with HFpEF (defined as a left ventricular ejection fraction ≥ 50%) from the CHECK-HF registry, which included patients from 2013 to 2016. Results Median age was 77 (IQR 15) years, 55% were women and the most frequent comorbidities were hypertension (51%), renal insufficiency (45%) and atrial fibrillation (AF, 38%). Patients between 65 and 80 years and those over 80 years had on average more comorbidities (up to 64% and 74%, respectively, with two or more comorbidities) than patients younger than 65 years (38% with two or more comorbidities, p-value < 0.001). Although no specific drugs are available for HFpEF, treating comorbidities is advised. Beta-blockers were most frequently prescribed (78%), followed by loop diuretics (74%), renin-angiotensin system (RAS) inhibitors (67%) and mineralocorticoid receptor antagonists (MRAs, 39%). Strongest predictors for loop-diuretic use were older age, higher New York Heart Association class and AF. Conclusion The medical HFpEF profile is determined by the underlying comorbidities, sex and age. Comorbidities are highly prevalent in HFpEF patients, especially in elderly HFpEF patients. Despite the lack of evidence, many HFpEF patients receive regular beta-blockers, RAS inhibitors and MRAs, often for the treatment of comorbidities.

scholarly journals Improvement in left ventricular ejection fraction after pharmacological up-titration in new-onset heart failure with reduced ejection fraction

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
J. F. Nauta ◽  
B. T. Santema ◽  
M. H. L. van der Wal ◽  
A. Koops ◽  
J. Warink-Riemersma ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Heart Failure ◽  
Ejection Fraction ◽  
Beta Blockers ◽  
Left Ventricular ◽  
Recommended Dose ◽  
Left Ventricular Ejection ◽  
Ventricular Ejection Fraction ◽  
Reduced Ejection Fraction ◽  
Ras Inhibitors

Abstract Objective Recent studies have reported suboptimal up-titration of heart failure (HF) therapies in patients with heart failure and a reduced ejection fraction (HFrEF). Here, we report on the achieved doses after nurse-led up-titration, reasons for not achieving the target dose, subsequent changes in left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF), and mortality. Methods From 2012 to 2018, 378 HFrEF patients with a recent (< 3 months) diagnosis of HF were referred to a specialised HF-nurse led clinic for protocolised up-titration of guideline-directed medical therapy (GDMT). The achieved doses of GDMT at 9 months were recorded, as well as reasons for not achieving the optimal dose in all patients. Echocardiography was performed at baseline and after up-titration in 278 patients. Results Of 345 HFrEF patients with a follow-up visit after 9 months, 69% reached ≥ 50% of the recommended dose of renin-angiotensin-system (RAS) inhibitors, 73% reached ≥ 50% of the recommended dose of beta-blockers and 77% reached ≥ 50% of the recommended dose of mineralocorticoid receptor antagonists. The main reasons for not reaching the target dose were hypotension (RAS inhibitors and beta-blockers), bradycardia (beta-blockers) and renal dysfunction (RAS inhibitors). During a median follow-up of 9 months, mean LVEF increased from 27.6% at baseline to 38.8% at follow-up. Each 5% increase in LVEF was associated with an adjusted hazard ratio of 0.84 (0.75–0.94, p = 0.002) for mortality and 0.85 (0.78–0.94, p = 0.001) for the combined endpoint of mortality and/or HF hospitalisation after a mean follow-up of 3.3 years. Conclusions This study shows that protocolised up-titration in a nurse-led HF clinic leads to high doses of GDMT and improvement of LVEF in patients with new-onset HFrEF.

Abstract 17311: Ventricular Arrhythmias and Fibrosis in Patients With Heart Failure and Preserved Ejection Fraction

Circulation ◽  
2020 ◽  
Vol 142 (Suppl_3) ◽  
Author(s):  
Natasha Cuk ◽  
Jae H Cho ◽  
Donghee Han ◽  
Joseph E Ebinger ◽  
Eugenio Cingolani
Keyword(s):  
Heart Failure ◽  
Ejection Fraction ◽  
Cardiac Mri ◽  
Ventricular Arrhythmias ◽  
Left Ventricular ◽  
Left Ventricular Ejection ◽  
Preserved Ejection Fraction ◽  
Ventricular Ejection Fraction ◽  
Patients With Heart Failure ◽  
Ventricular Fibrosis

Introduction: Sudden death due to ventricular arrhythmias (VA) is one of the main causes of mortality in patients with heart failure and preserved ejection fraction (HFpEF). Ventricular fibrosis in HFpEF has been suspected as a substrate of VA, but the degree of fibrosis has not been well characterized. Hypothesis: HFpEF patients with increased degree of fibrosis will manifest more VA. Methods: Cedars-Sinai medical records were probed using Deep 6 artificial intelligence data extraction software to identify patients with HFpEF who underwent cardiac magnetic resonance imaging (MRI). MRI of identified patients were reviewed to measure extra-cellular volume (ECV) and degree of fibrosis. Ambulatory ECG monitoring (Ziopatch) of those patients were also reviewed to study the prevalence of arrhythmias. Results: A total of 12 HFpEF patients who underwent cardiac MRI were identified. Patients were elderly (mean age 70.3 ± 7.1), predominantly female (83%), and overweight (mean BMI 32 ± 9). Comorbidities included hypertension (83%), dyslipidemia (75%), and coronary artery disease (67%). Mean left ventricular ejection fraction by echocardiogram was 63 ± 8.7%. QTc as measured on ECG was not significantly prolonged (432 ± 15 ms). ECV was normal in those patients for whom it was available (24.2 ± 3.1, n = 9) with 3/12 patients (25%) demonstrating ventricular fibrosis by MRI (average burden of 9.6 ± 5.9%). Ziopatch was obtained in 8/12 patients (including all 3 patients with fibrosis) and non-sustained ventricular tachycardia (NSVT) was identified in 5/8 (62.5%). One patient with NSVT and without fibrosis on MRI also had a sustained VA recorded. In those patients who had Ziopatch monitoring, there was no association between presence of fibrosis and NSVT (X2 = 0.035, p = 0.85). Conclusions: Ventricular fibrosis was present in 25% of HFpEF patients in this study and NSVT was observed in 62.5% of those patients with HFpEF who had Ziopatch monitoring. The presence of fibrosis by Cardiac MRI was not associated with NSVT in this study; however, the size of the cohort precludes broadly generalizable conclusions about this association. Further investigation is required to better understand the relationship between ventricular fibrosis by MRI and VA in patients with HFpEF.

Abstract 13135: Starting Beta-blockers in Hypertension is Followed by Excess Loop Diuretic Use: Beta-blocker Induced Heart Failure?

Circulation ◽  
2020 ◽  
Vol 142 (Suppl_3) ◽  
Author(s):  
Daniel N Silverman ◽  
Jeanne d de Lavallaz ◽  
Timothy B Plante ◽  
Margaret M Infeld ◽  
Markus Meyer
Keyword(s):  
Heart Failure ◽  
Ejection Fraction ◽  
Beta Blocker ◽  
Antihypertensive Medication ◽  
Temporal Relationship ◽  
Loop Diuretic ◽  
Beta Blockers ◽  
Left Ventricular ◽  
Left Ventricular Ejection ◽  
Ventricular Ejection Fraction

Introduction: Recent investigation has identified that discontinuation of beta-blockers in subjects with normal left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) leads to a reduction in natriuretic peptide levels. We investigated whether a similar trend would be seen in a hypertension clinical trial cohort. Methods: In 9,012 subjects hypertensive subjects without a history of symptomatic heart failure, known LVEF <35% or recent heart failure hospitalization enrolled in the Systolic Blood Pressure Intervention Trial (SPRINT), we compared incidence of loop diuretic initiation and time to initiation following start of a new anti-hypertensive medication. The categorical relationship (new antihypertensive class followed by loop-diuretic use) and temporal relationship (time to loop diuretic initiation) were each analyzed. The categorical relationship was assessed using a Pearson’s chi-squared test and the temporal relationship using a Wilcoxon rank sum test. Bonferroni-corrected p-values were utilized for all comparisons. Results: Among the 9,012 subjects analyzed, the incidence of anti-hypertensive initiation and loop diuretic initiation was greatest following start of a beta-blocker (16.6%) compared with other antihypertensive medication classes (calcium channel blocker 13.8%, angiotensin converting enzyme-inhibitor/angiotensin receptor blocker 12.9% and thiazide diuretic 10.2%; p<0.001). In addition, the median time between starting a new antihypertensive medication and loop diuretic was the shortest for beta-blockers and longest for thiazides (both p <0.01). No significant differences in renal function were identified between groups. Conclusion: Compared to other major classes of hypertensive agents, starting beta-blockers was associated with more common and earlier initiation of a loop diuretics in a population without heart failure at baseline. This finding may suggest beta-blocker induced heart failure in a population with a predominantly normal ejection fraction.

Abstract 13104: The Concomitant Inflammation Affect the Ratio of N-terminal Pro B-type Natriuretic Peptide to B-type Natriuretic Peptide in Patients With Heart Failure and Preserved Ejection Fraction

Circulation ◽  
2020 ◽  
Vol 142 (Suppl_3) ◽  
Author(s):  
Tsutomu Kawai ◽  
Takahisa Yamada ◽  
Tetsuya Watanabe ◽  
Shunsuke Tamaki ◽  
Shungo Hikoso ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Heart Failure ◽  
Ejection Fraction ◽  
Natriuretic Peptide ◽  
Left Ventricular ◽  
Left Ventricular Ejection ◽  
Preserved Ejection Fraction ◽  
Ventricular Ejection Fraction ◽  
Inflammatory Status ◽  
Patients With Heart Failure ◽  
Multicenter Prospective Observational Study

Backgrounds: Although B-type natriuretic peptide (BNP) and N-terminal pro B-type natriuretic peptide (NT-proBNP ) are interrelated parameters in assessment heart failure severity and prognosis, the ratio of NT-proBNP to BNP (NT-proBNP/BNP) are affected by various clinical factors, such as renal function. However, little is known about the influence of inflammation on NT-proBNP/BNP in patients with heart failure and preserved ejection fraction (HFpEF). Methods and Results: Patients data were extracted from PURSUIT-HFpEF registry, which is a multicenter prospective observational study including patients hospitalized for acute heart failure with left ventricular ejection fraction of >50%. Of 871 patients, data of BNP and NT-proBNP was available in 654 patients. The median baseline concentration of BNP was 474 pg/ml (299-720), NT-proBNP was 3310 pg/ml (1740-6840), and NT-proBNP/BNP was 7.6 (5.0-11.8). In multivariable linear regression analyses, older age [odds ratio (OR); 1.05, 95% confidence interval (CI); 1.02-1.09, p=0.001], higher creatinine [OR; 2.63, 95% CI; 1.66-4.16, p<0.001], and higher C-reactive protein (CRP) [OR; 1.17, 95% CI; 1.06-1.28, p<0.001] were significantly associated with a higher NT-proBNP/BNP (>median value of 7.6). However, other factors expected to affect NT-proBNP/BNP, such as atrial fibrillation and body mass index, were not associated with a higher NT-proBNP/BNP in this study. Patients in the highest CRP quartile had significantly higher NT-proBNP/BNP than those with other quartiles. Conclusion: In HFpEF patients, concomitant inflammation was associated with high NT-proBNP/BNP, which indicated that we need a careful interpretation on these two natriuretic peptides of patients with HFpEF and inflammatory status, such as infection.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document