Numerical study of the natural fracture using dual porosity-dual permeability model for Rumaila Field, southern Iraq

2021 ◽  
Vol 14 (18) ◽  
Author(s):  
Amani J. Majeed ◽  
Ahmed Al-Mukhtar ◽  
Falah A. Abood ◽  
Ahmed K. Alshara
Fuel ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 295 ◽  
pp. 120610
Author(s):  
Yafei Luo ◽  
Binwei Xia ◽  
Honglian Li ◽  
Huarui Hu ◽  
Mingyang Wu ◽  
...  

Author(s):  
Thayller Weverton Barp ◽  
Bruno Klahr ◽  
Thiago André Carniel ◽  
Eduardo Fancello

2015 ◽  
Vol 18 (04) ◽  
pp. 523-533 ◽  
Author(s):  
Shuhua Wang ◽  
Mingxu Ma ◽  
Wei Ding ◽  
Menglu Lin ◽  
Shengnan Chen

Summary Pressure-transient analysis in dual-porosity media is commonly studied by assuming a constant reservoir permeability. Such an assumption can result in significant errors when estimating pressure behavior and production rate of naturally fractured reservoirs as fracture permeability decreases during the production. At present, there is still a lack of analytical pressure-transient studies in naturally fractured reservoirs while taking stress-sensitive fracture permeability into account. In this study, an approximate analytical model is proposed to investigate the pressure behavior and production rate in the naturally fractured reservoirs. This model assumes that fracture permeability is a function of both permeability modulus and pressure difference. The pressure-dependent fracture system is coupled with matrix system with an unsteady-state exchange flow rate. A nonlinear diffusivity equation in fracture system is developed and solved by Pedrosa's transformation and a perturbation technique with zero-order approximation. A total of six solutions in the Laplace space are presented for two inner-boundary conditions and three outer-boundary conditions. Finally, pressure behavior and production rate are studied for both infinite and finite reservoirs. Pressure behavior and production rate from the models with and without stress-sensitive permeability are compared. It is found that, for an infinite reservoir with a constant-flow-rate boundary condition, if permeability modulus is 0.1, dimensionless pressure difference at the well bottom from the model with fracture-permeability sensitivity is 80% higher than that of the constant fracture-permeability model at a dimensionless time of 106. Such difference can be as high as 216% if permeability modulus increases to 0.15. On the contrary, for the infinite reservoirs with a constant-pressure boundary, the constant fracture-permeability model tends to overestimate the flow rate at wellbore and cumulative production. The proposed model not only provides an analytical and quantitative method to investigate the effects of fracture-permeability sensitivity on reservoir-pressure distribution and production, but it also can be applied to build up analysis of well test data from stress-sensitive formations.


SPE Journal ◽  
2008 ◽  
Vol 13 (01) ◽  
pp. 58-67 ◽  
Author(s):  
Bin Gong ◽  
Mohammad Karimi-Fard ◽  
Louis J. Durlofsky

Summary The geological complexity of fractured reservoirs requires the use of simplified models for flow simulation. This is often addressed in practice by using flow modeling procedures based on the dual-porosity, dual-permeability concept. However, in most existing approaches, there is not a systematic and quantitative link between the underlying geological model [in this case, a discrete fracture model (DFM)] and the parameters appearing in the flow model. In this work, a systematic upscaling procedure is presented to construct a dual-porosity, dual-permeability model from detailed discrete fracture characterizations. The technique, referred to as a multiple subregion (MSR) model, represents an extension of an earlier method that did not account for gravitational effects. The subregions (or subgrid) are constructed for each coarse block using the iso-pressure curves obtained from local pressure solutions of a discrete fracture model over the block. The subregions thus account for the fracture distribution and can represent accurately the matrix-matrix and matrix-fracture transfer. The matrix subregions are connected to matrices in vertically adjacent blocks (as in a dual-permeability model) to capture phase segregation caused by gravity. Two-block problems are solved to provide fracture-fracture flow effects. All connections in the coarse-scale model are characterized in terms of upscaled transmissibilities, and the resulting coarse model can be used with any connectivity-based reservoir simulator. The method is applied to simulate 2D and 3D fracture models, with viscous, gravitational, and capillary pressure effects, and is shown to provide results in close agreement with the underlying DFM. Speedups of approximately a factor of 120 are observed for a complex 3D example. Introduction The accurate simulation of fractured reservoirs remains a significant challenge. Although improvements in many technical areas are required to enable reliable predictions, there is a clear need for procedures that provide accurate and efficient flow models from highly resolved geological characterizations. These geological descriptions are often in the form of discrete fracture representations, which are generally too detailed for direct use in reservoir simulation. Dual-porosity modeling is the standard simulation technique for flow prediction of fractured reservoirs. This model was first proposed by Barenblatt and Zheltov (1960) and introduced to the petroleum industry by Warren and Root (1963). The key aspect of this approach is to separate the flow through the fractures from the flow inside the matrix. The reservoir model is represented by two overlapping continua—one continuum to represent the fracture network, where the main flow occurs, and another continuum to represent the matrix, which acts as a source for the fracture continuum. The interaction between these two continua is modeled through a transfer function, also called the shape factor. Though very useful, the model is quite simple in that the geological and flow complexity is reduced to a single parameter, the shape factor. This parameter is in general different for each gridblock depending on the underlying geology and the type of flow.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document