Fractal permeability model for dual-porosity media embedded with natural tortuous fractures

Fuel ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 295 ◽  
pp. 120610
Author(s):  
Yafei Luo ◽  
Binwei Xia ◽  
Honglian Li ◽  
Huarui Hu ◽  
Mingyang Wu ◽  
...  
2015 ◽  
Vol 18 (04) ◽  
pp. 523-533 ◽  
Author(s):  
Shuhua Wang ◽  
Mingxu Ma ◽  
Wei Ding ◽  
Menglu Lin ◽  
Shengnan Chen

Summary Pressure-transient analysis in dual-porosity media is commonly studied by assuming a constant reservoir permeability. Such an assumption can result in significant errors when estimating pressure behavior and production rate of naturally fractured reservoirs as fracture permeability decreases during the production. At present, there is still a lack of analytical pressure-transient studies in naturally fractured reservoirs while taking stress-sensitive fracture permeability into account. In this study, an approximate analytical model is proposed to investigate the pressure behavior and production rate in the naturally fractured reservoirs. This model assumes that fracture permeability is a function of both permeability modulus and pressure difference. The pressure-dependent fracture system is coupled with matrix system with an unsteady-state exchange flow rate. A nonlinear diffusivity equation in fracture system is developed and solved by Pedrosa's transformation and a perturbation technique with zero-order approximation. A total of six solutions in the Laplace space are presented for two inner-boundary conditions and three outer-boundary conditions. Finally, pressure behavior and production rate are studied for both infinite and finite reservoirs. Pressure behavior and production rate from the models with and without stress-sensitive permeability are compared. It is found that, for an infinite reservoir with a constant-flow-rate boundary condition, if permeability modulus is 0.1, dimensionless pressure difference at the well bottom from the model with fracture-permeability sensitivity is 80% higher than that of the constant fracture-permeability model at a dimensionless time of 106. Such difference can be as high as 216% if permeability modulus increases to 0.15. On the contrary, for the infinite reservoirs with a constant-pressure boundary, the constant fracture-permeability model tends to overestimate the flow rate at wellbore and cumulative production. The proposed model not only provides an analytical and quantitative method to investigate the effects of fracture-permeability sensitivity on reservoir-pressure distribution and production, but it also can be applied to build up analysis of well test data from stress-sensitive formations.


SPE Journal ◽  
2008 ◽  
Vol 13 (01) ◽  
pp. 58-67 ◽  
Author(s):  
Bin Gong ◽  
Mohammad Karimi-Fard ◽  
Louis J. Durlofsky

Summary The geological complexity of fractured reservoirs requires the use of simplified models for flow simulation. This is often addressed in practice by using flow modeling procedures based on the dual-porosity, dual-permeability concept. However, in most existing approaches, there is not a systematic and quantitative link between the underlying geological model [in this case, a discrete fracture model (DFM)] and the parameters appearing in the flow model. In this work, a systematic upscaling procedure is presented to construct a dual-porosity, dual-permeability model from detailed discrete fracture characterizations. The technique, referred to as a multiple subregion (MSR) model, represents an extension of an earlier method that did not account for gravitational effects. The subregions (or subgrid) are constructed for each coarse block using the iso-pressure curves obtained from local pressure solutions of a discrete fracture model over the block. The subregions thus account for the fracture distribution and can represent accurately the matrix-matrix and matrix-fracture transfer. The matrix subregions are connected to matrices in vertically adjacent blocks (as in a dual-permeability model) to capture phase segregation caused by gravity. Two-block problems are solved to provide fracture-fracture flow effects. All connections in the coarse-scale model are characterized in terms of upscaled transmissibilities, and the resulting coarse model can be used with any connectivity-based reservoir simulator. The method is applied to simulate 2D and 3D fracture models, with viscous, gravitational, and capillary pressure effects, and is shown to provide results in close agreement with the underlying DFM. Speedups of approximately a factor of 120 are observed for a complex 3D example. Introduction The accurate simulation of fractured reservoirs remains a significant challenge. Although improvements in many technical areas are required to enable reliable predictions, there is a clear need for procedures that provide accurate and efficient flow models from highly resolved geological characterizations. These geological descriptions are often in the form of discrete fracture representations, which are generally too detailed for direct use in reservoir simulation. Dual-porosity modeling is the standard simulation technique for flow prediction of fractured reservoirs. This model was first proposed by Barenblatt and Zheltov (1960) and introduced to the petroleum industry by Warren and Root (1963). The key aspect of this approach is to separate the flow through the fractures from the flow inside the matrix. The reservoir model is represented by two overlapping continua—one continuum to represent the fracture network, where the main flow occurs, and another continuum to represent the matrix, which acts as a source for the fracture continuum. The interaction between these two continua is modeled through a transfer function, also called the shape factor. Though very useful, the model is quite simple in that the geological and flow complexity is reduced to a single parameter, the shape factor. This parameter is in general different for each gridblock depending on the underlying geology and the type of flow.


2009 ◽  
Author(s):  
Saeed Mohammed Al-Mubarak ◽  
Zaki Alali ◽  
Tony Reuben Pham ◽  
Thierry Lemaux ◽  
Francois-Michel Colomar

2019 ◽  
Vol 9 (15) ◽  
pp. 3206 ◽  
Author(s):  
Guofeng Han ◽  
Yang Chen ◽  
Min Liu ◽  
Xiaoli Liu

Shale and fractured cores often exhibit dual-continuum medium characteristics in pulse decay testing. Dual-continuum medium models can be composed of different flow paths, interporosity flow patterns, and matrix shapes. Various dual-continuum medium models have been used by researchers to analyze the results of pulse decay tests. But the differences in their performance for pulse decay tests have not been comprehensively investigated. The characteristics of the dual-permeability model and the dual-porosity model, the slab matrix, and the spherical matrix in pulse decay testing are compared by numerical modeling in this study. The pressure and pressure derivative curves for different vessel volumes, storativity ratios, interporosity flow coefficients, and matrix-fracture permeability ratios were compared and analyzed. The study found that these models have only a small difference in the interporosity flow stage, and the difference in the matrix shape is not important, and the matrix shape cannot be identified by pulse decay tests. When the permeability of the low permeability medium is less than 1% of the permeability of the high permeability medium, the difference between the dual-permeability model and the dual-porosity model can be ignored. The dual-permeability model approaches the pseudo-steady-state model as the interporosity flow coefficient and vessel volume increase. Compared with the dual-porosity model, the dual-permeability model has a shorter horizontal section of the pressure derivative in the interporosity flow stage. Finally, the conclusions were verified against a case study. This study advances the ability of pulse decay tests to investigate the properties of unconventional reservoir cores.


SPE Journal ◽  
2008 ◽  
Vol 13 (03) ◽  
pp. 289-297 ◽  
Author(s):  
Huiyun Lu ◽  
Ginevra Di Donato ◽  
Martin J. Blunt

Summary We propose a physically motivated formulation for the matrix/fracture transfer function in dual-porosity and dual-permeability reservoir simulation. The approach currently applied in commercial simulators (Barenblatt et al. 1960; Kazemi et al. 1976) uses a Darcy-like flux from matrix to fracture, assuming a quasisteady state between the two domains that does not correctly represent the average transfer rate in a dynamic displacement. On the basis of 1D analyses in the literature, we find expressions for the transfer rate accounting for both displacement and fluid expansion at early and late times. The resultant transfer function is a sum of two terms: a saturation-dependent term representing displacement and a pressure-dependent term to model fluid expansion. The transfer function is validated through comparison with 1D and 2D fine-grid simulations and is compared to predictions using the traditional Kazemi et al. (1976) formulation. Our method captures the dynamics of expansion and displacement more accurately. Introduction The conventional macroscopic treatment of flow in fractured reservoirs assumes that there are two communicating domains: a flowing region containing connected fractures and high permeability matrix and a stagnant region of low-permeability matrix (Barenblatt et al. 1960; Warren and Root 1963). Conventionally, these are referred to as fracture and matrix, respectively. Transfer between fracture and matrix is mediated by gravitational and capillary forces. In a dual-porosity model, it is assumed that there is no viscous flow in the matrix; a dual-permeability model allows flow in both fracture and matrix. In a general compositional model (where black-oil and incompressible flow are special cases) we can write[Equation 1], where where Gc is a transfer term with units of mass per unit volume per unit time--it is a rate (units of inverse time) times a density (mass per unit volume). c is a component density (concentration) with units of mass of component per unit volume. The subscript p labels the phase, and c labels the component. Gc represents the transfer of component c from fracture to matrix. The subscript f refers to the flowing or fractured domain. The first term is accumulation, and the second term represents flow--this is the same as in standard (nonfractured) reservoir simulation. We can write a corresponding equation for the matrix, m,[Equation 2] where we have assumed a dual-porosity model (no flow in the matrix); for a dual-permeability model, a flow term is added to Eq. 2.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document