Discriminatory Capacity of Prenatal Ultrasound Measures for Large-for-Gestational-Age Birth: A Bayesian Approach to ROC Analysis Using Placement Values

Author(s):  
Soutik Ghosal ◽  
Zhen Chen
2004 ◽  
Vol 10 ◽  
pp. 31
Author(s):  
Florence M. Amorado-Santos ◽  
Maria Honolina S. Gomez ◽  
Maria Victoria R. Olivares ◽  
Zayda N. Gamilla

Author(s):  
Alexandra Cremona ◽  
Amanda Cotter ◽  
Khadijah Ismail ◽  
Kevin Hayes ◽  
Alan Donnelly ◽  
...  

Author(s):  
Ekaterine Inashvili ◽  
Natalia Asatiani ◽  
Ramaz Kurashvili ◽  
Elena Shelestova ◽  
Mzia Dundua ◽  
...  

2018 ◽  
Vol 104 (5) ◽  
pp. 1766-1776 ◽  
Author(s):  
Freja Bach Kampmann ◽  
Anne Cathrine Baun Thuesen ◽  
Line Hjort ◽  
Sjurdur Frodi Olsen ◽  
Sara Monteiro Pires ◽  
...  

Abstract Context and Objective Being born small or large for gestational age and intrauterine exposure to gestational diabetes (GDM) increase the risk of type 2 diabetes in the offspring. However, the potential combined deleterious effects of size at birth and GDM exposure remains unknown. We examined the independent effect of size at birth and the influence of GDM exposure in utero on cardiometabolic traits, body composition, and puberty status in children. Design, Participants, and Methods The present study was a longitudinal birth cohort study. We used clinical data from 490 offspring of mothers with GDM and 527 control offspring aged 9 to 16 years, born singleton at term from the Danish National Birth Cohort with available birthweight data. Results We found no evidence of a U-shaped association between size at birth (expressed as birthweight, sex, and gestational age adjusted z-score) and cardiometabolic traits. Body size in childhood and adolescence reflected the size at birth but was not reflected in any metabolic outcome. No synergistic adverse effect of being born small or large for gestational age and exposure to GDM was shown. However, GDM was associated with an adverse metabolic profile and earlier onset of female puberty in childhood and adolescence independently of size at birth. Conclusion In childhood and adolescence, we found GDM was a stronger predictor of dysmetabolic traits than size at birth. The combination of being born small or large and exposed to GDM does not exacerbate the metabolic profile in the offspring.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document