Efficacy of Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation-Enhanced Mindfulness-Based Program for Chronic Pain: a Single-Blind Randomized Sham Controlled Pilot Study

Mindfulness ◽  
2020 ◽  
Vol 11 (4) ◽  
pp. 895-904
Author(s):  
Elizabeth McCallion ◽  
Charles S. H. Robinson ◽  
Vincent P. Clark ◽  
Katie Witkiewitz
Keyword(s):  
Chronic Pain ◽  
Pilot Study ◽  
Direct Current ◽  
Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation ◽  
Direct Current Stimulation ◽  
Single Blind

Anodal transcranial direct current stimulation for chronic pain in the elderly: a pilot study

2015 ◽  
Vol 28 (2) ◽  
pp. 231-237 ◽  
Author(s):  
Carmen Concerto ◽  
Mohomad Al Sawah ◽  
Eileen Chusid ◽  
Michael Trepal ◽  
Gregory Taylor ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Chronic Pain ◽  
Pilot Study ◽  
Direct Current ◽  
Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation ◽  
The Elderly ◽  
Direct Current Stimulation ◽  
Pain In The Elderly

Effects of transcranial direct current stimulation on performance and recovery sleep during acute sleep deprivation: a pilot study

2021 ◽  
Vol 79 ◽  
pp. 124-133
Author(s):  
Jin-xiang Cheng ◽  
Xianchao Zhao ◽  
Jian Qiu ◽  
Yingcong Jiang ◽  
Jiafeng Ren ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Pilot Study ◽  
Sleep Deprivation ◽  
Direct Current ◽  
Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation ◽  
Direct Current Stimulation ◽  
Recovery Sleep ◽  
Acute Sleep Deprivation

A pilot study of alternative transcranial direct current stimulation electrode montages for the treatment of major depression

2014 ◽  
Vol 167 ◽  
pp. 251-258 ◽  
Author(s):  
Kerrie-Anne Ho ◽  
Siwei Bai ◽  
Donel Martin ◽  
Angelo Alonzo ◽  
Socrates Dokos ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Pilot Study ◽  
Major Depression ◽  
Direct Current ◽  
Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation ◽  
Direct Current Stimulation ◽  
Stimulation Electrode

scholarly journals Comparison of repeated transcranial stimulation and transcranial direct-current stimulation on primary motor cortex excitability and inhibition: A pilot study

2018 ◽  
pp. 59-67 ◽  
Author(s):  
Vincent Cabibel ◽  
Makii Muthalib ◽  
Jérôme Froger ◽  
Stéphane Perrey
Keyword(s):  
Pilot Study ◽  
Motor Cortex ◽  
Direct Current ◽  
Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation ◽  
Primary Motor Cortex ◽  
Motor Evoked Potentials ◽  
High Definition ◽  
Direct Current Stimulation ◽  
Motor Cortex Excitability ◽  
The Right

Repeated transcranial magnetic stimulation (rTMS) is a well-known clinical neuromodulation technique, but transcranial direct-current stimulation (tDCS) is rapidly growing interest for neurorehabilitation applications. Both methods (contralesional hemisphere inhibitory low-frequency: LF-rTMS or lesional hemisphere excitatory anodal: a-tDCS) have been employed to modify the interhemispheric imbalance following stroke. The aim of this pilot study was to compare aHD-tDCS (anodal high-definition tDCS) of the left M1 (2 mA, 20 min) and LF-rTMS of the right M1 (1 Hz, 20 min) to enhance excitability and reduce inhibition of the left primary motor cortex (M1) in five healthy subjects. Single-pulse TMS was used to elicit resting and active (low level muscle contraction, 5% of maximal electromyographic signal) motor-evoked potentials (MEPs) and cortical silent periods (CSPs) from the right and left extensor carpi radialis muscles at Baseline, immediately and 20 min (Post-Stim-20) after the end of each stimulation protocol. LF-rTMS or aHD-tDCS significantly increased right M1 resting and active MEP amplitude at Post-Stim-20 without any CSP modulation and with no difference between methods. In conclusion, this pilot study reported unexpected M1 excitability changes, which most likely stems from variability, which is a major concern in the field to consider.

Auditory P300 as a Neurophysiological Correlate of Symptomatic Improvement by Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation in Patients With Schizophrenia: A Pilot Study

2018 ◽  
Vol 51 (4) ◽  
pp. 252-258
Author(s):  
Minah Kim ◽  
Tak Hyung Lee ◽  
Wu Jeong Hwang ◽  
Tae Young Lee ◽  
Jun Soo Kwon
Keyword(s):  
Pilot Study ◽  
Direct Current ◽  
Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation ◽  
Negative Symptoms ◽  
Symptomatic Improvement ◽  
P300 Amplitude ◽  
Direct Current Stimulation ◽  
Auditory P300 ◽  
Related Potentials ◽  
Positive And Negative Symptoms

Background. The reduced amplitude, prolonged latency, and increased intertrial variability of auditory P300 have been consistently reported in relation to the symptomatic severity of schizophrenia. This study investigated whether auditory P300 event-related potentials can be used as an objective indicator of symptomatic improvement by transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) in patients with schizophrenia. Methods. Ten patients with schizophrenia received 20 minutes of 2-mA tDCS twice a day for 5 consecutive weekdays. The anode was placed over the left dorsolateral prefrontal cortex, and the cathode was placed over the left temporo-parietal cortex. The Positive and Negative Syndrome Scale (PANSS) and the auditory P300 were measured for each participant at baseline and after the completion of the tDCS applications. Results. The participants showed significant improvement in the positive and negative symptoms as indexed by change in the PANSS scores by the tDCS. The P300 amplitude, latency, and intertrial variability did not statistically significantly differ after the tDCS application. However, a significant association was observed between the reduced P300 intertrial variability and improvement in the positive symptoms by tDCS. In addition, the changes in both the P300 latency and intertrial variability were significantly correlated with reduced negative symptoms after the tDCS application. Conclusions. Although this pilot study is limited by the small sample size and lack of a sham control, the results suggest that auditory P300 may be a putative marker reflecting the effect of tDCS on the positive and negative symptoms of schizophrenia.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document