Adult Langerhans cell histiocytosis with caecal and regional lymph node involvement

2016 ◽  
Vol 88 (3) ◽  
pp. 201-204
Author(s):  
A. Androulaki ◽  
A. Klimis
Cancer ◽  
2003 ◽  
Vol 97 (10) ◽  
pp. 2425-2431 ◽  
Author(s):  
Igor Frank ◽  
John C. Cheville ◽  
Michael L. Blute ◽  
Christine M. Lohse ◽  
Ajay Nehra ◽  
...  

1984 ◽  
Vol 34 (4) ◽  
pp. 889-893
Author(s):  
Toshiaki Manabe ◽  
Yoshikazu Tasaka ◽  
Masamichi Amano ◽  
Takeshi Okunobo

2014 ◽  
Vol 2014 ◽  
pp. 1-5
Author(s):  
A. Bahar Ceyran ◽  
Serkan Şenol ◽  
Barış Bayraktar ◽  
Şeyma Özkanlı ◽  
Z. Leyla Cinel ◽  
...  

A 37-year-old male case was admitted with goiter. Ultrasonography of thyroid showed a 5 cm cystic nodule in the left lobe with a 1.5 cm solid component. Fine needle aspiration biopsy revealed atypia of undetermined significance or follicular lesion. The patient was operated on. The pathological diagnosis was reported as papillary thyroid carcinoma. The immunohistochemical examination showed multiple foci of Langerhans cell histiocytosis involving both lobes. The patient died due to cardiac arrest with respiratory causes in the early postoperative period. Langerhans cell histiocytosis is a rare primary condition which involves abnormal clonal proliferation of Langerhans cells in various tissues and organs. Thyroid involvement is infrequently seen. Although the etiology is unknown, genetic components may be linked to the disease. It is also associated with a family history of thyroid disease. Papillary thyroid carcinoma is the most common malignant epithelial tumor of the thyroid gland. Langerhans cell histiocytosis presenting with papillary thyroid carcinoma is rare. The privilege of our case is langerhans cell histiocytosis of the thyroid with multiple cervical lymph node involvement accompanying cervical lymph node metastatic thyroid papillary carcinoma.


2018 ◽  
Vol 2 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Jack Cuzick

Abstract There is a somewhat confused belief that a biomarker must show an interaction effect with a treatment before it can be used to determine the need for such a treatment. This is rarely true for well-established clinical markers such as tumor size or regional lymph node involvement. In many cases, this is also not true for biomarkers, especially when considering nontargeted therapies. Here I argue that for nontargeted treatments prognosis is often more important than interaction with treatment, because it is the absolute and not the relative benefit that matters, and when there is no treatment interaction, the same relative benefit translates into a larger absolute benefit for poor prognosis patients.


2020 ◽  
Vol 3 (10) ◽  
pp. e2018790
Author(s):  
Almir Bitencourt ◽  
Carolina Rossi Saccarelli ◽  
Elizabeth A. Morris ◽  
Jessica Flynn ◽  
Zhigang Zhang ◽  
...  

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document