Hydrogeology of non-salt Gachsaran Formation in Iran: an example from the Zagros Range–Tang sorkh Valley

2012 ◽  
Vol 28 (3) ◽  
pp. 309-319
Author(s):  
Jalal A. Aghdam ◽  
Ezzat Raeisi ◽  
Mohammad Zare ◽  
Paolo Forti ◽  
Bruno Capaccioni
1973 ◽  
Vol 63 (1) ◽  
pp. 339-354 ◽  
Author(s):  
Thomas V. McEvilly ◽  
Reza Razani

abstract The destructive earthquake, Ms = 7.1 (BRK), occurred at 0537 a.m. local time, near an agricultural center in the mountainous Zagros Range of the Fars Province in the south of Iran. Leveling virtually all structures in the epicentral region, the shock killed nearly 25 per cent of the population of about 23,000 people in the devastated villages within a radius of about 50 km from the epicenter. Hardest hit was the valley complex of Qir, Karzin, and Afzar. The high percentage of death was mainly caused by structural failure and the collapse of the heavy roof of almost all adobe and masonry residential structures in the area. Structural failure of buildings with modern steel-beam roofs and of the traditional adobe and masonry-walled buildings with heavy timbered roofs in the region was due primarily to the lateral shear failure of poorly constructed adobe and masonry, lack of earthquake-resistant vertical load-carrying columns or elements, and lack of bracing and adequate tie-in in the roofs. Engineered buildings also collapsed, generally, because of defects in engineering and construction practices. Only minor cases of ground failure were observed, mainly slides in steep mountainous regions and some collapse of steep banks of rivers and irrigation channels.


2016 ◽  
Vol 34 ◽  
pp. 898-907 ◽  
Author(s):  
Behzad Mehrgini ◽  
Hossein Memarian ◽  
Maurice B. Dusseault ◽  
Ali Ghavidel ◽  
Mohammad Heydarizadeh

2021 ◽  
Vol 196 ◽  
pp. 108009
Author(s):  
Bahman Bagha Dashtaki ◽  
Gholam Reza Lashkaripour ◽  
Mohammad Ghafoori ◽  
Naser Hafezi Moghaddas

2014 ◽  
Vol 30 (3) ◽  
pp. 287-306 ◽  
Author(s):  
Bahman Soleimani ◽  
Alireza Bahadori
Keyword(s):  
Sw Iran ◽  

1960 ◽  
Vol 97 (4) ◽  
pp. 299-308 ◽  
Author(s):  
R. G. S. Hudson

AbstractThe lower part of the limestone succession of the Hagab Monocline in the Oman Peninsula, Arabia, is divided into the Bih Dolomite (Permian, 650 m.), Hagil Limestone (Permian, 260 m.), Ghail Limestone (Trias, 600 m.) and the Elphinstone Beds (Noric, 431 m.). The latter consists of five formations, two of which are very fossiliferous. The succession also occurs to the south in borings in the forelands of the Oman Mountains and is similar to that of the foreland of the Zagros Range of Iran.


2020 ◽  
Vol 38 (3) ◽  
pp. 2619-2637
Author(s):  
Mohammad Reza Rahimi ◽  
Seyed Davoud Mohammadi ◽  
Alireza Taleb Beydokhti

2015 ◽  
Vol 63 (5) ◽  
pp. 1231-1243 ◽  
Author(s):  
Saeed Parvizi ◽  
Riyaz Kharrat ◽  
Mohammad R. Asef ◽  
Bijan Jahangiry ◽  
Abdolnabi Hashemi

1898 ◽  
Vol 30 (2) ◽  
pp. 241-288 ◽  
Author(s):  
J. Kennedy

Letters and coinage are the natural fruits of commerce. Scholars agree that the Indian or Brahma alphabet had a Western origin, and owed its existence to commercial exigencies. But while Hofrath Dr. Bühler traces it to a Phoenician source, and ascribes its creation to the early part of the eight century b.c., M. Halévy derives it from an Aramaean script in the time of Alexander the Great No such definite theory has been put forward with regard to the silver coins called purānas, the most ancient coins of India; but it is generally believed that they were current before the Macedonian invasion, and, as silver has always been one of the most important of the imports from the West into India, we should naturally suppose that silver coinage came also from the West—unless, indeed, it were an indigenous invention. In the case, then, both of Indian letters and of Indian coinage, a direct and constant intercourse with Western Asia is the presupposition of every solution. Now, for a trade between Western Asia and India three routes are possible. The first climbs up the precipitous and zigzag passes of the Zagros range—which the Greeks called “ladders”—into the treeless regions of Persia. This route was barred for centuries by the inveterate hostility of the mountaineers, and it did not become practicable until the “Great King” reduced the Kurdish highlanders and the lowland Semites to an equal vassalage.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document