The Impact of an Online Training Program About Cancer Clinical Trials on Primary Care Physicians’ Knowledge, Attitudes and Beliefs, and Behavior

2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Carma L. Bylund ◽  
Margo Michaels ◽  
Elisa S. Weiss ◽  
Shilpa Patel ◽  
Thomas A. D’Agostino ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Primary Care ◽  
Clinical Trials ◽  
Training Program ◽  
Primary Care Physicians ◽  
Online Training ◽  
Cancer Clinical Trials ◽  
Attitudes And Beliefs ◽  
And Behavior ◽  
The Impact

scholarly journals Primary care physicians’ attitudes and beliefs about cancer clinical trials

2017 ◽  
Vol 14 (5) ◽  
pp. 518-525 ◽  
Author(s):  
Carma L Bylund ◽  
Elisa S Weiss ◽  
Margo Michaels ◽  
Shilpa Patel ◽  
Thomas A D’Agostino ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Primary Care ◽  
Clinical Trials ◽  
Primary Care Physicians ◽  
Online Survey ◽  
Minority Groups ◽  
Clinical Care ◽  
Trial Participation ◽  
Cancer Clinical Trials ◽  
Attitudes And Beliefs ◽  
Positive Attitudes

Background/Aims: Cancer clinical trials give patients access to state-of-the-art treatments and facilitate the translation of findings into mainstream clinical care. However, patients from racial and ethnic minority groups remain underrepresented in clinical trials. Primary care physicians are a trusted source of information for patients, yet their role in decision-making about cancer treatment and referrals to trial participation has received little attention. The aim of this study was to determine physicians’ knowledge, attitudes, and beliefs about cancer clinical trials, their experience with trials, and their interest in appropriate training about trials. Methods: A total of 613 physicians in the New York City area primarily serving patients from ethnic and racial minority groups were invited via email to participate in a 20-min online survey. Physicians were asked about their patient population, trial knowledge and attitudes, interest in training, and personal demographics. Using calculated scale variables, we used descriptive statistical analyses to better understand physicians’ knowledge, attitudes, and beliefs about trials. Results: A total of 127 physicians completed the survey. Overall, they had low knowledge about and little experience with trials. However, they generally had positive attitudes toward trials, with 41.4% indicating a strong interest in learning more about their role in trials, and 35.7% indicating that they might be interested. Results suggest that Black and Latino physicians and those with more positive attitudes and beliefs were more likely to be interested in future training opportunities. Conclusion: Primary care physicians may be an important group to target in trying to improve cancer clinical trial participation among minority patients. Future work should explore methods of educational intervention for such interested providers.

scholarly journals Impact of Primary Care Provider Knowledge, Attitudes, and Beliefs about Cancer Clinical Trials: Implications for Referral, Education and Advocacy

2014 ◽  
Vol 30 (1) ◽  
pp. 152-157 ◽  
Author(s):  
Margo Michaels ◽  
Thomas A. D’Agostino ◽  
Natasha Blakeney ◽  
Elisa S. Weiss ◽  
Maria C. Binz-Scharf ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Primary Care ◽  
Clinical Trials ◽  
Care Provider ◽  
Primary Care Provider ◽  
Cancer Clinical Trials ◽  
Attitudes And Beliefs ◽  
Provider Knowledge

The impact of a program to enhance the competencies of primary care physicians in caring for patients with AIDS

1986 ◽  
Vol 1 (5) ◽  
pp. 287-294 ◽  
Author(s):  
Charles E. Lewis ◽  
Howard E. Freeman ◽  
Sherrie H. Kaplan ◽  
Christopher R. Corey
Keyword(s):  
Primary Care ◽  
Primary Care Physicians ◽  
The Impact

Physicians’ accounts of frontline tensions when implementing pilot projects to improve primary care

2018 ◽  
Vol 32 (1) ◽  
pp. 39-55 ◽  
Author(s):  
Elizabeth Mansfield ◽  
Onil Bhattacharyya ◽  
Jennifer Christian ◽  
Gary Naglie ◽  
Vicky Steriopoulos ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Primary Care ◽  
Health Services ◽  
Primary Care Physicians ◽  
Pilot Project ◽  
Models Of Care ◽  
Structured Interviews ◽  
Pilot Projects ◽  
Additional Time ◽  
Content Type ◽  
The Impact

Purpose Canada’s primary care system has been described as “a culture of pilot projects” with little evidence of converting successful initiatives into funded, permanent programs or sharing project outcomes and insights across jurisdictions. Health services pilot projects are advocated as an effective strategy for identifying promising models of care and building integrated care partnerships in local settings. In the qualitative study reported here, the purpose of this paper is to investigate the strengths and challenges of this approach. Design/methodology/approach Semi-structured interviews were conducted with 34 primary care physicians who discussed their experiences as pilot project leads. Following thematic analysis methods, broad system issues were captured as well as individual project information. Findings While participants often portrayed themselves as advocates for vulnerable patients, mobilizing healthcare organizations and providers to support new models of care was discussed as challenging. Competition between local healthcare providers and initiatives could impact pilot project success. Participants also reported tensions between their clinical, project management and research roles with additional time demands and skill requirements interfering with the work of implementing and evaluating service innovations. Originality/value Study findings highlight the complexity of pilot project implementation, which encompasses physician commitment to addressing care for vulnerable populations through to the need for additional skill set requirements and the impact of local project environments. The current pilot project approach could be strengthened by including more multidisciplinary collaboration and providing infrastructure supports to enhance the design, implementation and evaluation of health services improvement initiatives.

Compliance, capacity, and quality in colonoscopy screening for CRC: A novel solution.

2011 ◽  
Vol 29 (4_suppl) ◽  
pp. 357-357 ◽  
Author(s):  
S. C. Lloyd
Keyword(s):  
Primary Care ◽  
Training Program ◽  
Primary Care Physicians ◽  
African American Men ◽  
Primary Care Providers ◽  
Care Providers ◽  
Adenoma Detection ◽  
Before And After ◽  
Outstanding Quality

357 Background: CRC is predominately preventable with high quality colonoscopy screenings. Unfortunately, less than half of Americans are “up-to-date.” When referred by primary care providers, less than half complete the process. We proposed to include the primary care provider (PCP) in a novel training program to extend skills from sigmoidoscopy to full colonoscopy in a “mentored and monitored” model. We know that quality in colonoscopy can vary widely (ten fold within a single 12-man group). The protective benefits of colonoscopy reflect the thoroughness of the removal of polyps. Unfortunately, the ACS projections for 2010 predict an increase of 4,400 deaths from CRC over 2009, an 8% rise! Furthermore the death rate for African American men has RISEN 28% since 1960. We are loosing a battle for which we posses the tools to win. To achieve victory we must successfully address all three factors: compliance, capacity and quality. Methods: Thirty primary care physicians in two states (SC, FL) were recruited. We measured compliance rates within the practice before and after enrollment. We further evaluated quality of the colonoscopies as reflected in completion, yield and complications. Results: Compliance more than doubled (38% to 84%). As a compliance enhancement tool, the results were outstanding. The evaluation of quality then became of paramount importance. The gross completion rate was 98.3%, the adenoma detection rate (reflecting polyp yield) was 38%. In over 20,000 cases there were only 5 perforations, substantially below published rates. The quality was consistently at the level of experienced conscientious gastroenterologists. The details of the training program and the use of the “two-man” colonoscopy technique have been reviewed elsewhere (MEDICAL CARE, Aug 2010). Conclusions: If replicated nationally, this model has the potential for saving 25,000 lives annually. The participation of the patient's PCP is a powerful influence for improved compliance. The availability of an “expert” for mentoring and monitoring results in outstanding and consistent quality. The model has the potential to dramatically enhance compliance simultaneously increasing capacity while maintaining outstanding quality. No significant financial relationships to disclose.

Utilization of a multisite financial reimbursement program to promote racial/ethnic diversity and inclusion in therapeutic cancer clinical trials: The iMPACT Study.

2020 ◽  
Vol 38 (29_suppl) ◽  
pp. 85-85
Author(s):  
Hala Borno ◽  
Sylvia Zhang ◽  
Elena Nieves ◽  
Dana Dornsife ◽  
Robert G. Johnson ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Clinical Trials ◽  
Low Socioeconomic Status ◽  
Ethnic Diversity ◽  
Phone Call ◽  
Cancer Clinical Trials ◽  
Impact Study ◽  
Low Socioeconomic ◽  
Diversity And Inclusion ◽  
The Impact ◽  
Racial Ethnic

85 Background: A lack of racial/ethnic diversity among cancer therapeutic clinical trial (TCT) participants remains a critical problem. The significance of costs, both direct and indirect, associated with cancer TCT participation are increasingly understood. Here, we report findings observed in the IMproving Patient Access to Cancer clinical Trials (IMPACT) study, a pilot feasibility study investigating the feasibility and efficacy of offering a financial reimbursement program (FRP) during cancer TCT discussion with or without additional outreach in improving enrollment and diversity. Methods: Participants for this study were recruited at two Comprehensive Cancer Centers (CCCs) from April to September 2019. Patients were randomized 1:1 to receive a brochure about a FRP at time of consent for a TCT or receive brochure and outreach through a scripted follow-up phone call regarding the FRP. Results: No difference in TCT enrollment was observed between study arms. Among 170 patients approached to participate, 132 (78%) provided consent. The participant mean age was 57 years old (std dev = 14 years). Among participants 57% were male and 49% were white. The remaining major racial/ethnic groups were Black (5%) Asian (13%) and Hispanic (26%). The proportion of non-whites was greater among IMPACT study (43%) compared to CCC TCT (28%) participants. Among FRP participants, 24% reported a household income < $25,000 and 14% from $25,001 to $56,000. Conclusions: This study observed that offering an FRP as part of TCT discussion is feasible and effective at CCCs. An outreach phone call is not required in order to influence enrollment in TCT. FRP recipients are racially/ethnically diverse and low socioeconomic status.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document