Abstract A50: Educating women about cancer clinical trials: The impact of a community health educator intervention in a primary care clinic

Author(s):  
Christine M. Gunn ◽  
Sharon K. Bak ◽  
Tracy A. Battaglia
2021 ◽  
Vol 9 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jenerius A. Aminawung ◽  
Tyler D. Harvey ◽  
Jerry Smart ◽  
Joseph Calderon ◽  
Anna Steiner ◽  
...  

Over half a million individuals return from United States prisons and millions more from jails every year, many of whom with complex health and social needs. Community health workers (CHWs) perform diverse roles to improve health outcomes in disadvantaged communities, but no studies have assessed their role as integrated members of a primary care team serving individuals returning from incarceration. Using data from participants who received primary care through the Transitions Clinic Network, a model of care that integrates CHWs with a lived experienced of incarceration into primary care teams, we characterized how CHWs address participant health and social needs during interactions outside of clinic visits for 6 months after participants established primary care. Among the 751 participants, 79% had one or more CHW interactions outside of the clinic documented. Participants with more comorbid conditions, longer stays during their most recent incarceration, and released with a prescription had more interactions with CHWs compared to those with fewer comorbidities, shorter stays, and no prescription at release. Median number of interactions was 4 (interquartile range, IQR 2–8) and 56% were in person. The most common issues addressed (34%) were social determinants of health, with the most common being housing (35%). CHWs working in interdisciplinary primary care teams caring for people with histories of incarceration perform a variety of functions for clients outside of scheduled primary care visits. To improve health outcomes among disadvantaged populations, CHWs should be able to work across multiple systems, with supervision and support for CHW activities both in the primary care clinic and within the community.


2011 ◽  
Vol 26 (S2) ◽  
pp. 1031-1031
Author(s):  
D. Kljenak

IntroductionMore than 15% of patients who present to a primary care clinic are considered “difficult” yet interprofessional members of primary care clinics receive little training on how to diagnose and manage these patients.ObjectivesBecome familiar with successful method of workshop development on how to diagnose and manage “difficult” patients to interprofessional audience of six community health centers.AimsThe aim of the workshop was to enhance primary care providers’ capacity to diagnose and manage “difficult” patients as well as serve as a pilot program for a larger conference on managing “difficult” patients.MethodsA half-day workshop was designed to fill this perceived need of community health providers to learn how to diagnose and manage “difficult” patients. The workshop consisted of didactic presentation and case based small group learning.This workshop served as a pilot program for the development of larger conference for community providers on managing “difficult” patients.ResultsThe workshop was evaluated by participants. 100% of respondents agreed that the workshop was relevant to their work and 87.5% of respondents reported that the workshop will alter their clinical practice.ConclusionThe workshop has met participants’ perceived learning needs as well as served as a pilot program for a larger conference on managing difficult patients.


2021 ◽  
Vol 21 ◽  
pp. 101267
Author(s):  
Chad M. Coleman ◽  
Andrew S. Bossick ◽  
Yueren Zhou ◽  
Linda Hopkins-Johnson ◽  
Mira G. Otto ◽  
...  

2016 ◽  
Vol 73 (6) ◽  
pp. 681-692 ◽  
Author(s):  
Autumn Lanoye ◽  
Karen E. Stewart ◽  
Bruce D. Rybarczyk ◽  
Stephen M. Auerbach ◽  
Elizabeth Sadock ◽  
...  

2020 ◽  
Vol 4 (Supplement_1) ◽  
pp. 479-479
Author(s):  
Renae Smith-Ray ◽  
Tanya Singh ◽  
Chester Robson

Abstract An estimated 30% of U.S. healthcare costs are due to waste, inefficiencies, and excessive pricing. Research shows that integrated primary care models (IPC) improve health outcomes and reduce costs. Nearly all IPCs embed ancillary clinicians, including pharmacists, within the clinic. IPCs that embed a primary care clinic within a pharmacy are novel. This study describes the first known IPC for older adults that is based in a pharmacy and examines its impact on medication adherence. In January 2018, Walgreens launched an IPC focused on Medicare Advantage patients at select Kansas City Walgreens locations. Each morning the entire IPC team meets to review needs of patients who will be seen that day. Upon arrival, the patient is first seen by a pharmacist who completes medication and immunization reviews and fall risk screening. If a new medication is prescribed during the physician visit, the pharmacist returns to consult the patient. The IPC team works together to ensure that the Medicare Annual Wellness Exam is completed in entirety. We examined the impact of IPC utilization on adherence to the top seven chronic condition drug groups. IPC patients age 50+ with sub-optimal adherence (<80% proportion of days covered) during the year prior to the clinic opening were included (n=64). A Student’s t-test revealed an 11% improvement in optimal adherence year-over-year between the pre- and post- periods (p<0.001). The pharmacy-based IPC is associated with improved medication adherence. Future research should examine the impact of this model on patient satisfaction and additional health outcomes.


BMJ Open ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 11 (12) ◽  
pp. e055637
Author(s):  
Rebekah Pratt ◽  
Channelle Ndagire ◽  
Abayomi Oyenuga ◽  
Serena Xiong ◽  
Katherine Carroll ◽  
...  

ObjectivesWhile there have been efforts to address common and culturally informed barriers to healthcare, Somali Americans have low rates of human papillomavirus (HPV) vaccination. This study aimed to use video reflexive ethnography (VRE) to identify primary care health inequities, derive interventions aimed at improving HPV vaccination rates in Somali Americans, and then test their impact on vaccination rates.DesignThe VRE methodology involves three sequential steps: data collection, reflexive discussion and identifying intervention in practice. Preintervention and postintervention vaccination uptake data were collected for Somali patients.SettingVRE was conducted with medical assistants (MAs) and Somali patients for 3 months (June–August 2018) in an urban primary care clinic in Minnesota, USA. HPV vaccination rates were collected and analysed pre-VRE and for a period of 6 months post the implementation of the interventions identified by VRE.Participants14 MAs participated in the VRE which designed the study intervention, which was tested on 324 Somali patients eligible for HPV vaccination.Primary outcome measureHPV vaccination uptake among Somali patients.ResultsMAs identified three practice challenges related to HPV vaccination: provider fatigue related to ongoing patient vaccine hesitancy or refusal, MAs misinterpretation of patient’s vaccination dissent language, and missed opportunities to respond to unique patient concerns as a result of following standard work procedures. Using VRE, MAs identified and developed several interventions to address these practice challenges. Adjusted for age at clinic visit (years), the difference in preintervention and postintervention HPV immunisation rates was 10.1 per 100 patient-visits (95% CI 2.97 17.3; p=0.0057).ConclusionVRE can engage MAs in an innovative, participatory process to identify and address concerns about health inequities. In this study, MAs designed and implemented interventions that improved HPV vaccination rates in Somali Americans. Further research is needed to more fully assess the impact of such interventions.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document