Multi-criteria decision-making and life cycle assessment model for optimal product selection: case study of knee support

2016 ◽  
Vol 14 (2) ◽  
pp. 353-364 ◽  
Author(s):  
D. Vukelic ◽  
I. Budak ◽  
B. Tadic ◽  
G. Simunovic ◽  
V. Kljajic ◽  
...  
2004 ◽  
Vol 06 (02) ◽  
pp. 153-175 ◽  
Author(s):  
ALEXANDRA URIE ◽  
SUZAN DAGG

This paper introduces the need for the responsible selection of construction products and then analyses a number of assessment methodologies. Some computer packages and guidebooks that assist in life cycle assessment or aid construction product selection are briefly reviewed. Issues that affect decision-making and complexities in the construction industry are discussed. A tool for assisting responsible construction product selection is then presented that involves carrying out a streamlined life cycle assessment, comparing a novel product to a traditional product. The tool is pragmatic because only three environmental criteria are considered (resource consumption, energy use and human and ecological impacts) and a relative rather then absolute assessment is required. The decision-assisting methodology is demonstrated with a case study. The limitations and benefits of the streamlined LCA are finally presented.


2007 ◽  
Vol 09 (04) ◽  
pp. 399-421 ◽  
Author(s):  
P. SINCLAIR ◽  
S. COWELL ◽  
R. LÖFSTEDT ◽  
R. CLIFT

While participation in environmental decision-making is widely recognised and valued in democratic countries as beneficial, its format and scope have not always been the source of agreement. The use of environmental systems assessment (ESA) offers the opportunity for structuring knowledge and decision-making systematically and appropriately to decision makers' concerns, to enable lay publics to participate in development of policy and implementation in public sector initiatives. In order to perform participatory ESA, effective means of involving lay people are required. This paper describes the development and testing of an innovative interactive multimedia package (WOMBLE), written for non-experts to enable them to use the expert tool WISARD, a quantitative life cycle assessment package, to enable involvement in developing and assessing options for management of Municipal Solid Waste (MSW). It was shown that this combination of tools can reduce the time needed to achieve effective communication, learning and active engagement.


2017 ◽  
Vol 4 (8) ◽  
pp. 1705-1721 ◽  
Author(s):  
Michael P. Tsang ◽  
Dingsheng Li ◽  
Kendra L. Garner ◽  
Arturo A. Keller ◽  
Sangwon Suh ◽  
...  

A dynamic life cycle impact assessment model demonstrates a non-constant intake fraction of inhaled nano-TiO2 as total emissions changes.


2019 ◽  
Vol 206 ◽  
pp. 27-39 ◽  
Author(s):  
Juan Carlos Gómez de Cózar ◽  
Antonio García Martínez ◽  
Íñigo Ariza López ◽  
Marta Ruiz Alfonsea

Author(s):  
R. Abu ◽  
M. A. A. Aziz ◽  
Z. Z. Noor

The integrated models specifically designed to help decision-making in food waste (FW) composting management through the analysis of previous research studies are reviewed. The integrated models are built predominantly within three decision-supporting tools, which include life-cycle assessment (LCA), life cycle costing (LCC), and multi-criteria decision-making (MCDM). Different integrated models were discussed and their strengths, limitations, and crucial problems as well as their potential integration were evaluated. Apparently, there has been no in-depth analysis of its approaches and potentialities of combining harmonically the LCA, LCC, and MCDM analysis tools in the FW composting management which taking into consideration multiple stakeholders. Thus, the combined LCA, LCC and MCDM with cluster analysis (CA) is suggested. The concepts underlying the sustainable FW composting management model can be divided into several aspects in terms of environmental friendliness, financial profitability, and social acceptance. This gives an insight and facilitates to waste management sectors to decide on a preferable FW composting management.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document