scholarly journals Post-operative Anemia After Major Surgery: a Brief Review

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Smita K. Kalra ◽  
Bright Thilagar ◽  
Maleka Khambaty ◽  
Efren Manjarrez
Keyword(s):  
Blood Loss ◽  
Surgical Techniques ◽  
Intravenous Iron ◽  
Patient Specific ◽  
Major Surgery ◽  
International Consensus ◽  
Circulatory Overload ◽  
Minimize Blood Loss ◽  
Poor Outcomes ◽  
International Consensus Statement

Abstract Purpose of Review Anemia is a very common complication in the post-operative period. Post-operative anemia is associated with poor outcomes including but not limited to infections, increased length of stay, circulatory overload, and mortality. The strategy of patient blood management focuses on three pillars that include the detection and treatment of pre-operative anemia; reduction of peri-operative blood loss; and harnessing and optimizing the patient-specific physiological reserve of anemia. Recent Findings Multiple studies in surgical patients have been conducted to study various methods of management of post-operative anemia. Recent advances in surgical techniques have also been studied to minimize blood loss. There is a widespread consensus on the use of intravenous iron in hospitalized post-operative patients after major surgery. Summary We discuss the most common causes of post-operative anemia and management focusing on measures to reduce blood loss and measures to increase red blood cell (RBC) mass. In this brief review, we present updates from the most relevant articles in the past 5 years and include updates from the 2018 international consensus statement on the management of post-operative anemia after major surgical procedures.

scholarly journals Blood Loss in Total Knee Arthroplasty

2016 ◽  
Vol 30 (05) ◽  
pp. 452-459 ◽  
Author(s):  
William Cundy ◽  
Annika Theodoulou ◽  
Chi Ling ◽  
Jeganath Krishnan ◽  
Christopher Wilson
Keyword(s):  
Total Knee Arthroplasty ◽  
Blood Loss ◽  
Knee Arthroplasty ◽  
Surgical Techniques ◽  
Patient Specific ◽  
Computer Assisted ◽  
Routine Practice ◽  
Patient Specific Instrumentation ◽  
Transfusion Requirements ◽  
Total Knee

AbstractPatients undergoing total knee arthroplasty (TKA) have expected blood loss during and after surgery. The morbidity associated with blood loss and the burden of blood transfusions in adult arthroplasty necessitates preoperative optimization as routine practice. Current literature remains inconclusive on which TKA surgical instrumentation techniques are effective in minimizing perioperative blood loss, and consequently lower transfusion rates. The primary objective of this retrospective review, of a prospective randomized cohort study, was to compare surgical and patient factors, and their influence on blood loss and transfusions rates, between one type of patient-specific instrumentation (PSI), navigated computer-assisted surgery (CAS), and conventional TKA surgical techniques.A cohort of 128 matched patients (38 PSI, 44 CAS, 46 conventional surgeries) were compared. Preoperative factors analyzed included; age, gender, body mass index, preoperative hemoglobin (Hb) (g/L), international normalized ratio, use of anticoagulants and comorbid bleeding diathesis. Maximal Hb drop and transfusion requirements were compared on day 1 to 3. Perioperative factors collected included: surgical time, tourniquet time, drain output, in situ drain time, order of tibia or femoral cut, and intraoperative loss from suction.The three groups did not differ on the preoperative patient demographics examined. The difference between preoperative Hb and the lowest postoperative Hb readings did not differ between study groups (p = 0.39).There are no statistically significant differences in blood loss when comparing PSI versus CAS versus conventional TKA. Although emerging evidence on PSI is encouraging, the PSI technique for TKA does not result in reduced blood loss. The study was registered with ClinicalTrials.gov: NCT01145157.

scholarly journals P3 A closed loop audit on pre-operative anaemia in major elective orthopaedic surger

BJS Open ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 5 (Supplement_1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Chan Hee Koh ◽  
Nicolai Gruner-Hegge ◽  
Dancho Ignatov ◽  
Aneesul Shakir ◽  
Chan Hee Koh
Keyword(s):  
Closed Loop ◽  
Perioperative Management ◽  
Consensus Statement ◽  
Preoperative Assessment ◽  
Action Plans ◽  
International Consensus ◽  
Change In Practice ◽  
International Consensus Statement ◽  
Preoperative Anaemia

Abstract Introduction The international consensus statement on perioperative management of anaemia advises that patients with haemoglobin (Hb) <130 be treated before undergoing elective operations. The advantages include reduced risk of acute kidney injuries, infections and transfusions, and quicker recovery. Methods Data was collected prospectively from 127 consecutive patients undergoing elective arthroplasties at Hinchingbrooke hospital. Baseline compliance with the consensus statement was first assessed in May 2018, and the results presented at a clinical governance meeting. Departmental action plans included early identification of anaemia and treatment to Hb 130, delaying operations where necessary. We then reassessed compliance in May 2019. Results There was a statistically significant change in practice (p = 0.036). The proportion of patients undergoing arthroplasties despite Hb < 130 reduced from 38% to 21%. Those operated with Hb < 120 decreased from 14% to 0%. The proportion of preoperative anaemias that were appropriately investigated during preoperative assessment increased from 11% to 80% (p < 0.001). The increase in attempted treatment of preoperative anaemia prior to surgery however was not significant (7% vs 20%; p = 0.279). Discussion Implementation of departmental action plans resulted in substantial improvements to clinical practice. For those that underwent arthroplasties despite mild preoperative anaemia, it may have been felt that delays in improvement to quality of life for treatment may be unacceptable, or the causes (e.g. chronic disease) difficult to treat. Further action plans should involve even earlier identification of anaemia, involving primary care at the point of referral.

scholarly journals Hepatic resection in children: highlighted and revisited steps

2019 ◽  
Vol 67 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Hesham Mohammed Abdelkader ◽  
Mohamed Abdel-Latif ◽  
Mohamed Abdelsattar ◽  
Ahmed Abdelhaseeb Youssef
Keyword(s):  
Blood Loss ◽  
Liver Tumors ◽  
University Hospital ◽  
Remnant Liver ◽  
Vascular Control ◽  
Biliary Leak ◽  
Intraoperative Bleeding ◽  
Male Predominance ◽  
Different Types ◽  
Minimize Blood Loss

Abstract Background Hepatectomy in children deserves exhaustive preoperative and intraoperative tools to define the anatomy, minimize blood loss, and confirm adequacy of liver tissue left. The aim of this study is to report our experience in surgical management of liver tumors. Results All liver resections performed in Ain-Shams University Hospital, by the same team, between July 2013 and June 2018 were retrospectively reviewed. Data related to basic demographics, indication for resection, methods of parenchymal resection, blood loss, hospital stay, morbidity, and mortality was collected. The study included 27 patients who underwent different types of hepatectomies. There was a male predominance. Age ranged from 6 months to 13 years. Weight ranged from 5.7 to 33.7 kg. Total operative time ranged from 68 to 322 min, while resection time ranged from 34 to 144 min. Blood loss ranged from 53 to 259 ml. Surgical morbidities included five patients with minor biliary leak, three patients had surgical site infection, and one patient had torsion of the remnant liver necessitating repositioning. Recurrence of the mass was faced in three patients with hepatoblastoma. There were two mortalities; one occurred as a sequela of massive intraoperative bleeding and the other took place due to postoperative hepatic insufficiency. Conclusion For a safe hepatectomy, thorough familiarity of the hepatic segmental anatomy together with the various techniques for parenchymal resection and vascular control is fundamental. Complications such as biliary leak and torsion of remnant can be easily avoided by simple measures.

scholarly journals Different Surgical Techniques in Tubo-ovarian Abscess Management

2017 ◽  
pp. 1
Author(s):  
Hale GÖKSEVER ÇELİK ◽  
Engin Çelik ◽  
Semra Yüksel ◽  
Ercan Baştu ◽  
Hasan Cemal Ark
Keyword(s):  
Surgical Techniques ◽  
Operation Technique ◽  
Blood Cell Count ◽  
Abscess Drainage ◽  
Mean Values ◽  
Surgical Methods ◽  
Training And Research ◽  
Poor Outcomes ◽  
One Year ◽  
Ovarian Abscess

<p><strong>Objectıve:</strong> Tubo-ovarian abscess is mostly a consequence of pelvic inflammatory disease. We aimed to compare success of the different surgical methods in tubo-ovarian abscess treatment.<br /><strong>Study Design:</strong> 53 patients with Tubo-ovarian abscess that were hospitalized and operated in the Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology at Kanuni Sultan Suleyman Training and Research Hospital during one year were included. Patients who had underwent salpingectomy/salpingo-oophorectomy and only abscess drainage were compared.<br /><strong>Results:</strong> Salpingectomy/salpingo-oophorectomy had been done in 74.5% of cases and only drainage had been applied in 25.5% of cases. Difference in mean values between 2 groups were not observed except white blood cell count. <br /><strong>Conclusıon:</strong> Treatment of Tubo-ovarian abscess must be a combination of parenteral antibiotics and early surgical procedure to prevent poor outcomes. There is not any difference between different surgical techniques. But additionally more studies are needed to better understand which operation technique is more effective and less complicated.</p>

scholarly journals Surgery for thoracolumbar junction (T12-L1) tuberculosis a multicentre, retrospective study

2019 ◽  
Author(s):  
Yanping Zeng ◽  
Peng Cheng ◽  
Jiulin Tan ◽  
Zhilin Li ◽  
Yuan Chen ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Blood Loss ◽  
Posterior Approach ◽  
Spinal Tuberculosis ◽  
Surgical Techniques ◽  
Operation Time ◽  
Thoracolumbar Junction ◽  
Group A ◽  
The Mean ◽  
Group B ◽  
Approach Group

Abstract Purpose A multicentre, retrospective study was conducted to evaluate the safety and efficacy of different surgical techniques for thoracolumbar junction (T12-L1) tuberculosis. Methods The medical records of thoracolumbar junction tuberculosis patients (n = 257) from January 2005 to January 2015 were collected and reviewed. A total of 45 patients were operated on by an anterior approach (Group A), 52 by a combined anterior and posterior approach (Group B) and 160 by a posterior approach (Group C). Anti-tuberculosis therapy was performed both before and after surgery. Clinical outcomes, laboratory indexes and radiological results of the three groups were compared. Results All three surgical approaches achieved bone fusion, pain relief and neurological recovery. The mean loss of correction in group A at last follow-up was higher than in groups B and C (P < 0.05), and the difference between groups B and C was not significant (P > 0.05). The mean operation time and blood loss in group B were greater than in groups A and C. Conclusions For patients with thoracolumbar junction (T12-L1) tuberculosis, the posterior-only approach is superior to the anterior-only approach in the correction of kyphosis and maintenance of spinal stability. The posterior-only approach is recommended because it achieves the same efficacy as the anterior-only or combined approach but with shorter operation times, less trauma and less blood loss. Keywords Spinal tuberculosis; Thoracolumbar junction; Three approaches.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document