A Scoping Review of the Contextual Factors Impacting Employment in Neurodevelopmental Disorders

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Emily FitzGerald ◽  
Briano DiRezze ◽  
Laura Banfield ◽  
Grace K. Nichol ◽  
Peter Rosenbaum
Keyword(s):  
Scoping Review ◽  
Neurodevelopmental Disorders ◽  
Contextual Factors

Urban Spatial Structure and Travel in China

2019 ◽  
Vol 35 (1) ◽  
pp. 6-24 ◽  
Author(s):  
Lingqian Hu ◽  
Jiawen Yang ◽  
Tianren Yang ◽  
Yuanjie Tu ◽  
Jing Zhu
Keyword(s):  
Spatial Structure ◽  
Scoping Review ◽  
Contextual Factors ◽  
Mixed Effects ◽  
Empirical Literature ◽  
Future Research ◽  
Urban Structure ◽  
Urban Spatial Structure ◽  
Complex Mechanisms ◽  
The Relationship

This article first provides a critical scoping review of empirical literature on the relationship between urban structure and travel in China. The review finds that residential suburbanization alone increases travel, polycentric development has mixed effects, and jobs–housing balance reduces travel. Second, this article compares the empirical findings of the urban structure–travel relationships in China with those observed in other countries, and it identifies contextual factors that can explain the differing relationships in China. We suggest that future research improve data and methodology and broaden the research scope to investigate the complex mechanisms that affect the urban structure–travel relationship in China.

scholarly journals The influence of psychological, social and contextual factors on recovery following a sport-related knee injury: a scoping review

2019 ◽  
Vol 27 ◽  
pp. S449-S450
Author(s):  
L.K. Truong ◽  
A.D. Mosewich ◽  
C.J. Holt ◽  
C.Y. Le ◽  
M. Miciak ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Scoping Review ◽  
Knee Injury ◽  
Contextual Factors

scholarly journals Public and patient involvement (PPI) in health policy decisionmaking on the health system-level: protocol for a systematic scoping review

BMJ Open ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 11 (5) ◽  
pp. e043650
Author(s):  
Lisa Ann Baumann ◽  
Anna Levke Brütt
Keyword(s):  
Health Policy ◽  
Health System ◽  
Scoping Review ◽  
Patient Involvement ◽  
Contextual Factors ◽  
System Level ◽  
Macro Level ◽  
Cochrane Library ◽  
Individual Treatment ◽  
Public And Patient Involvement

IntroductionPublic and patient involvement (PPI) in healthcare decisions at the health system-level (macro-level) has become increasingly important during recent years. Existing evidence indicates that PPI increase patient centredness and the democracy of healthcare decisions as well as patients’ trust and acceptance of these decisions. However, different methods for PPI exist, and an overview of the outcomes and influential contextual factors has not yet been conducted. Therefore, this scoping review aims to provide an overview of the different methods used for PPI in health system decisionmaking and the reported outcomes and contextual factors for these methods.Methods and analysisThe structure of this protocol is guided by the advanced scoping studies framework of Arksey and O’ Malley, developed by Levac, Colquhoun and O’Brien, and the PRISMA-ScR Statement. We will systematically search electronic databases (MEDLINE, Cochrane Library, Scopus, CINAHL, PDQ-Evidence, Web of Science and PsycINFO) for peer-reviewed literature and screen the reference lists of included studies. Additionally, we will search for relevant grey literature and consult experts from the field to identify further information. Studies focusing on PPI in the context of health policy decision-making at the macro-level will be eligible for full-text screening. Studies focusing on decisions at the individual treatment-level (micro-level) and the organisational-level (mesolevel) as well as those dealing with PPI in health research will be excluded. A qualitative analysis will dissect how the included studies define PPI and its desirable outcomes, the achieved outcomes and reported contextual factors.Ethics and disseminationWe will present the results at relevant conferences and in an open-access journal. Additionally, we will share them with the experts involved in the research process and consider ways in which to transfer the findings into practice. As only secondary and previously published information will be used, ethical approval is not necessary.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document