Plastic Impacts in Argentina: a Critical Research Review Contributing to the Global Knowledge

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ana C. Ronda ◽  
Andrés H. Arias ◽  
Guido N. Rimondino ◽  
Analía F. Pérez ◽  
Agustín Harte ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Research Review ◽  
Global Knowledge ◽  
Critical Research

scholarly journals Information Systems in Developing Countries: A Critical Research Review

2008 ◽  
Vol 23 (3) ◽  
pp. 133-146 ◽  
Author(s):  
Chrisanthi Avgerou
Keyword(s):  
Developing Countries ◽  
Information Systems ◽  
Information And Communication Technologies ◽  
Communication Technologies ◽  
Research Review ◽  
Critical Research ◽  
Organizational Intervention ◽  
Is Implementation ◽  
Strategic Value ◽  
Information And Communication

In this paper I review the Information Systems (IS) research on how developing countries have attempted to benefit from information and communication technologies (ICTs). First I identify three discourses on IS implementation and associated organizational and social change that coexist in information systems in developing countries (ISDC) research, namely as a process of technology and knowledge transfer and adaptation to local social conditions; as a process of socially embedded action; and as a process of transformative techno-organizational intervention associated with global politics and economics. I then point out the distinctive research agenda that has been formed in ISDC studies, both in the more familiar IS themes - failure, outsourcing, and strategic value of ICT - and also in studies of themes relevant specifically to the context of developing countries, such as the development of community ICT and information resources. Finally, I call the reader's attention to the potentially significant theoretical contributions of ISDC research for understanding IS innovation in relation to social context and in relation to socio-economic development theories and policies.

Review of Fault Tolerance Frameworks in the Cloud

2020 ◽  
Vol 11 (3) ◽  
pp. 79-99
Author(s):  
Ajay Rawat ◽  
Rama Sushil ◽  
Amit Agarwal
Keyword(s):  
Fault Tolerance ◽  
Cloud Services ◽  
Research Review ◽  
Cloud Environment ◽  
Critical Research ◽  
Vm Placement ◽  
Critical Metrics ◽  
Research Survey ◽  
Detection Strategy ◽  
Inherent Vulnerability

Fault tolerance is the most imperious issue in the cloud to provide reliable services. Inherent vulnerability to failure hampers the performance and reliability of cloud services. Hence, to achieve reliability, fault tolerance becomes a mandatory feature which is hard to implement due to the dynamic infrastructure and complex interdependencies. Numerous fault tolerance techniques have been developed in the literature to address the challenges of cloud reliability. A recent research survey presented in this paper attempts to integrate the different fault tolerance architecture. This study presents a critical research review on various existing fault tolerance techniques to improve services reliability, availability, and applications execution in the cloud. A comparative analysis, based on different critical metrics like failure prediction, detection strategy, failure history, VM placement, and limitations, of the reviewed framework systems is also included in the paper. This review intends to facilitate the development of the new fault tolerance technique for the cloud environment.

scholarly journals Community-Academic Peer Review: Prospects for Strengthening Community-Campus Engagement and Enriching Scholarship

2019 ◽  
Vol 4 (2) ◽  
pp. 1-20 ◽  
Author(s):  
Charles Z. Levkoe ◽  
Victoria Schembri ◽  
Amanda DiVito Wilson
Keyword(s):  
Peer Review ◽  
Peer Review Process ◽  
Ways Of Knowing ◽  
Pilot Project ◽  
Research Review ◽  
Critical Research ◽  
Community Based ◽  
Community Based Research ◽  
Campus Engagement ◽  
Community Perspectives

Scholarly peer review is hailed as an indispensable process to maintain quality and rigour in research publications. However, there is growing recognition of the limitations of peer review and concerns about the unexamined assumptions surrounding the processes that favour academic ways of knowing. In this paper, we build on these debates by exploring the possibilities for engaging communities in shaping and assessing the value of knowledge. Drawing on insights of a community-academic peer review pilot project through a pan-Canadian research partnership, we reflect on the value of incorporating community perspectives into research review processes and challenges of scaling-up these efforts. We argue that the perspectives of community-based practitioners are a necessary part of peer review—especially for Community-Based Research—to increase validity and accountability. This process gives academics and practitioners the power to collectively assess and evaluate knowledge products. Fundamentally, these efforts are about reviving higher education and critical research as part of a democratic public sphere that is open, inclusive, and relevant. We conclude by reflecting on the value of incorporating community perspectives into the peer review process. We also offer recommendations on how to recognize and incorporate community knowledge and experiences into assessment structures.

ASSESSMENT OF INFORMAL AND FORMAL INFERENTIAL REASONING: A CRITICAL RESEARCH REVIEW

2019 ◽  
Vol 18 (1) ◽  
pp. 8-25
Author(s):  
MARIA GUADALUPE TOBÍAS-LARA ◽  
ANA LUISA GÓMEZ-BLANCARTE
Keyword(s):  
Education Research ◽  
Data Analysis ◽  
Statistics Education ◽  
Research Review ◽  
Inferential Reasoning ◽  
Critical Research ◽  
Statistics Education Research ◽  
Research Journal ◽  
Informal Inferential Reasoning

As a contribution to the discussion on the assessment of informal inferential reasoning (IIR) and the transition from this to formal inferential reasoning (FIR), we present a review of research on how these two types of inferential reasoning have been conceptualized and assessed. Based on our review, we discuss the need to redefine the conceptions of IIR and FIR in order to create an integrated description of inferential reasoning that includes not only ideas of IIR and FIR, but also the whole activity of argumentation, which involves the production of both statistical and contextual reasons. Current descriptions of IIR and FIR list the facts that might be brought from data analysis to the process of inferential reasoning. The approach we propose considers how the facts, both statistical and contextual, can be used as arguments, leading to assessments of students’ inferential  reasoning focusing on articulating the statistical and contextual reasons students present to support an inference. First published May 2019 at Statistics Education Research Journal Archives

scholarly journals English immigration discourse in the scientific paradigm of critical research: review of the monograph by M.S. Matytsina

2020 ◽  
Vol 2 (4) ◽  
pp. 96-101
Author(s):  
I. V. Chekulai
Keyword(s):  
Doctoral Students ◽  
Social Relations ◽  
Associate Professor ◽  
Foreign Languages ◽  
Research Review ◽  
Critical Research ◽  
Scientific Paradigm ◽  
Teachers And Students ◽  
The Usa ◽  
Development Of Language

The reviewed work is the monograph written by M.S. Matytsina, the Associate Professor of Foreign Languages Department, Lipetsk State Technical University. In the book the author describes the development trends of the English immigration discourse in the scientific paradigm of critical research. The author focuses on establishing the relationship between discourse and society, and the connecting link in this interaction is cognitive structures, which are a subjective mental construct of participants in the communicative situation. The aim of the study is to analyze and systematize the existing knowledge about the problem of immigration in dynamically developing societies of Great Britain and the USA, assess the state of development of language processes that occur as a result of observed trends, and also identify the place and role of the language content of the discourse in social relations building. The study broadens and deepens the existing knowledge about various techniques of modern political rhetoric and discursive phenomena. The monograph is addressed to specialists in the field of discursive analysis, language theory, political linguistics, doctoral students, graduate students, applicants, teachers and students of institutes and departments of foreign languages.

Why children? A research review.

1988 ◽  
Author(s):  
Helena Willen
Keyword(s):  
Research Review
Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document