Clinical Outcomes of Direct Oral Anticoagulants and Warfarin in Japanese Patients with Atrial Fibrillation Aged ≥ 85 Years: A Single-Center Observational Study

Abstract Background Direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs) are not only increasingly being used for the initial stroke prevention therapy but progressively also substitute vitamin K antagonist (VKA) treatment in patients with non-valvular atrial fibrillation (AF). DOACs have been compared regarding therapeutic efficacy and adverse outcomes to warfarin in several pivotal studies and showed non-inferiority in terms of stroke prevention and superiority in terms of bleeding complications. However, comprehensive comparative studies are lacking for phenprocoumon, a VKA prescribed frequently outside the USA and the UK and accounting for 99% of all VKA prescriptions in Germany. Patients treated with phenprocoumon seem to meet more often international normalized ratio values in the therapeutic range, which may have implications concerning their efficacy and safety. This study aims at comparing the risk of stroke and bleeding in phenprocoumon- and DOAC-treated patients with AF in an adequately powered observational study population. Methods Retrospective analysis of stroke and bleeding incidence of 837,430 patients (1.27 million patient years) treated with DOAC or phenprocoumon for stroke prevention in German ambulatory care between 2010 and 2017. Relative risks of stroke and bleeding were estimated by calculating cox regression-derived hazard ratios (HR) and 95% confidence intervals (CI) of propensity score-matched cohorts. Results Patients treated with DOAC had an overall higher risk for stroke (HR 1.32; CI 1.29–1.35) and a lower risk for bleeding (0.89; 0.88–0.90) compared to phenprocoumon. When analyzed separately, the risk for stroke was higher for dabigatran (1.93; 1.82–2.03), apixaban (1.52; 1.46–1.58), and rivaroxaban (1.13; 1.10–1.17) but not for edoxaban (0.88; 0.74–1.05). The risk for bleeding was lower for dabigatran (0.85; 0.83–0.88), apixaban (0.71; 0.70–0.73), and edoxaban (0.74; 0.68–0.81) but not for rivaroxaban (1.03; 1.01–1.04). Conclusions This study provides a comprehensive view of the stroke and bleeding risks associated with phenprocoumon and DOAC use in Germany. Phenprocoumon may be preferable to DOAC treatment for the prevention of strokes in AF in a real-world population cared for in ambulatory care.

Download Full-text

How minimally interrupted direct oral anticoagulants affect intraprocedural anticoagulation during atrial fibrillation ablation? Insights from a Japanese single‐center retrospective study

Journal of Arrhythmia ◽

10.1002/joa3.12228 ◽

2019 ◽

Vol 35 (5) ◽

pp. 716-724

Author(s):

Masahiro Mizobuchi ◽

Atsushi Funatsu ◽

Tomoko Kobayashi ◽

Shigeru Nakamura

Keyword(s):

Atrial Fibrillation ◽

Retrospective Study ◽

Oral Anticoagulants ◽

Direct Oral Anticoagulants ◽

Atrial Fibrillation Ablation ◽

Single Center

Download Full-text

Oral anticoagulants usage in Japanese patients aged 18–74 years with non-valvular atrial fibrillation: a retrospective analysis based on insurance claims data

Family Practice ◽

10.1093/fampra/cmz016 ◽

2019 ◽

Vol 36 (6) ◽

pp. 685-692 ◽

Cited By ~ 2

Author(s):

Ayako Ohshima ◽

Toshihiro Koyama ◽

Aiko Ogawa ◽

Yoshito Zamami ◽

Hiroyoshi Y Tanaka ◽

...

Keyword(s):

Atrial Fibrillation ◽

Claims Data ◽

Oral Anticoagulants ◽

Direct Oral Anticoagulants ◽

Japanese Patients ◽

Hazard Ratio ◽

Adjusted Hazard Ratio ◽

Insurance Claims ◽

Systemic Embolism ◽

Insurance Claims Data

Abstract Background Oral anticoagulants use has increased rapidly, internationally. Here we look at risks and benefits, based on Japanese data, of therapy with low risk non-valvular atrial fibrillation patients. Objectives Using a health insurance claims data set we assessed: (i) oral anticoagulants usage in Japan, and (ii) efficacy and safety of dabigatran compared with warfarin, in Japanese patients with non-valvular atrial fibrillation, aged 18–74 years. Methods We identified 4380 non-valvular atrial fibrillation patients treated with anticoagulants between 1 January 2005, and 28 February 2014, and estimated the adjusted hazard ratio for stroke or systemic embolism, and any hemorrhagic event (Cox proportional hazards regression model with stabilized inverse probability treatment weighting). Results The data included 101 989 anticoagulant prescriptions for 4380 patients, of which direct oral anticoagulants increased to 40.0% of the total by the end of the study. After applying exclusion criteria, 1536 new non-valvular atrial fibrillation patients were identified, including 1071 treated with warfarin and 465 with dabigatran. Mean ages were 56.11 ± 9.70 years for warfarin, and 55.80 ± 9.65 years for dabigatran. The adjusted hazard ratio (95% confidence interval), comparing dabigatran with warfarin, was 0.48 (0.25–0.91) for stroke or systemic embolism, and 0.91 (0.60–1.39) for any hemorrhage including intracranial and gastrointestinal. Conclusions Number of patients prescribed direct oral anticoagulants steadily increased, and incidence of all-cause bleeding related to dabigatran was similar to warfarin, in our study population of younger non-valvular atrial fibrillation patients. Dabigatran, compared with warfarin, generally reduced risk of all-cause stroke and systemic embolism.

Download Full-text