Oral anticoagulants usage in Japanese patients aged 18–74 years with non-valvular atrial fibrillation: a retrospective analysis based on insurance claims data

2019 ◽  
Vol 36 (6) ◽  
pp. 685-692 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ayako Ohshima ◽  
Toshihiro Koyama ◽  
Aiko Ogawa ◽  
Yoshito Zamami ◽  
Hiroyoshi Y Tanaka ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Atrial Fibrillation ◽  
Claims Data ◽  
Oral Anticoagulants ◽  
Direct Oral Anticoagulants ◽  
Japanese Patients ◽  
Hazard Ratio ◽  
Adjusted Hazard Ratio ◽  
Insurance Claims ◽  
Systemic Embolism ◽  
Insurance Claims Data

Abstract Background Oral anticoagulants use has increased rapidly, internationally. Here we look at risks and benefits, based on Japanese data, of therapy with low risk non-valvular atrial fibrillation patients. Objectives Using a health insurance claims data set we assessed: (i) oral anticoagulants usage in Japan, and (ii) efficacy and safety of dabigatran compared with warfarin, in Japanese patients with non-valvular atrial fibrillation, aged 18–74 years. Methods We identified 4380 non-valvular atrial fibrillation patients treated with anticoagulants between 1 January 2005, and 28 February 2014, and estimated the adjusted hazard ratio for stroke or systemic embolism, and any hemorrhagic event (Cox proportional hazards regression model with stabilized inverse probability treatment weighting). Results The data included 101 989 anticoagulant prescriptions for 4380 patients, of which direct oral anticoagulants increased to 40.0% of the total by the end of the study. After applying exclusion criteria, 1536 new non-valvular atrial fibrillation patients were identified, including 1071 treated with warfarin and 465 with dabigatran. Mean ages were 56.11 ± 9.70 years for warfarin, and 55.80 ± 9.65 years for dabigatran. The adjusted hazard ratio (95% confidence interval), comparing dabigatran with warfarin, was 0.48 (0.25–0.91) for stroke or systemic embolism, and 0.91 (0.60–1.39) for any hemorrhage including intracranial and gastrointestinal. Conclusions Number of patients prescribed direct oral anticoagulants steadily increased, and incidence of all-cause bleeding related to dabigatran was similar to warfarin, in our study population of younger non-valvular atrial fibrillation patients. Dabigatran, compared with warfarin, generally reduced risk of all-cause stroke and systemic embolism.

scholarly journals Early Initiation of Direct Oral Anticoagulants After Onset of Stroke and Short- and Long-Term Outcomes of Patients With Nonvalvular Atrial Fibrillation

Stroke ◽  
2020 ◽  
Vol 51 (3) ◽  
pp. 883-891 ◽  
Author(s):  
Tadataka Mizoguchi ◽  
Kanta Tanaka ◽  
Kazunori Toyoda ◽  
Sohei Yoshimura ◽  
Ryo Itabashi ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Atrial Fibrillation ◽  
Ischemic Stroke ◽  
Major Bleeding ◽  
Oral Anticoagulants ◽  
Direct Oral Anticoagulants ◽  
Hazard Ratio ◽  
Interquartile Range ◽  
Systemic Embolism ◽  
Nonvalvular Atrial Fibrillation ◽  
Ischemic Attack

Background and Purpose— We aimed to compare outcomes of ischemic stroke patients with nonvalvular atrial fibrillation between earlier and later initiation of direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs) after stroke onset. Methods— From data for 1192 nonvalvular atrial fibrillation patients with acute ischemic stroke or transient ischemic attack in a prospective, multicenter, observational study, patients who started DOACs during acute hospitalization were included and divided into 2 groups according to a median day of DOAC initiation after onset. Outcomes included stroke or systemic embolism, major bleeding, and death at 3 months, as well as those at 2 years. Results— DOACs were initiated during acute hospitalization in 499 patients in median 4 (interquartile range, 2–7) days after onset. Thus, 223 patients (median age, 74 [interquartile range, 68–81] years; 78 women) were assigned to the early group (≤3 days) and 276 patients (median age, 75 [interquartile range, 69–82] years; 101 women) to the late (≥4 days) group. The early group had lower baseline National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale score and smaller infarcts than the late group. The rate at which DOAC administration persisted at 2 years was 85.2% overall, excluding patients who died or were lost to follow-up. Multivariable Cox shared frailty models showed comparable hazards between the groups at 2 years for stroke or systemic embolism (hazard ratio, 0.86 [95% CI, 0.47–1.57]), major bleeding (hazard ratio, 1.39 [95% CI, 0.42–4.60]), and death (hazard ratio, 0.61 [95% CI, 0.28–1.33]). Outcome risks at 3 months also did not significantly differ between the groups. Conclusions— Risks for events including stroke or systemic embolism, major bleeding, and death were comparable whether DOACs were started within 3 days or from 4 days or more after the onset of nonvalvular atrial fibrillation–associated ischemic stroke or transient ischemic attack. Registration— URL: https://www.clinicaltrials.gov . Unique identifier: NCT01581502.

scholarly journals Anticoagulation Challenges in Hematogeriatrics: Effectiveness and Safety of Direct Oral Anticoagulants Vs Vitamin k Antagonist in Elderly with Atrial Fibrillation

Blood ◽  
2019 ◽  
Vol 134 (Supplement_1) ◽  
pp. 1162-1162
Author(s):  
Desirée Campoy ◽  
Gonzalo Artaza ◽  
César A Velasquez ◽  
Tania Canals ◽  
Erik A Johansson ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Atrial Fibrillation ◽  
Elderly Patients ◽  
Vitamin K ◽  
Major Bleeding ◽  
Frail Elderly ◽  
Oral Anticoagulants ◽  
Direct Oral Anticoagulants ◽  
Vitamin K Antagonist ◽  
Systemic Embolism ◽  
Bleeding Events

BACKGROUND Direct oral anticoagulants (DOAC) are increasingly used in patients with Non Valvular Atrial Fibrillation (NVAF) for stroke prevention. However, Follow-Up (FU) and dosing these agents in the elderly can be challenging due to different factors, such as chronic kidney disease, frailty, falls, multifactorial anemia and concomitant polypharmacy. These factors in elderly patients predisposes to both thromboembolic and bleeding events once atrial fibrillation occurs. Therefore, balancing risks and benefits of antithrombotic strategies in older populations is crucial. Despite recent increases in DOAC use in NVAF, there are still limited data regarding DOACs effectiveness and safety in frail elderly patients. AIM To assess the effectiveness and safety according to DOAC or Vitamin K Antagonist (VKA) in a cohort of elderly patients with NVAF. METHODS From April 2016 to April 2019, we consecutively included NVAF elderly patients (≥80 years-old) treated with DOAC or VKA in a prospective multicenter registry. Demographic, laboratory, frailty risk stratification and antithrombotic therapy data were collected. Patients had a minimum FU of 6 months. VKA patients had a standard FU through digital international normalized ratio (INR) control and the efficacy of therapy was determined by the time in therapeutic range (TTR) values from the preceding 6 months of treatment using Rosendaal's method. FU in DOAC patients was performed through structured and integral assessment following the Tromboc@t Working Group recommendations for management in patients receiving DOAC (Olivera et al, Med Clin 2018). Key practical management aspects are listed in the flow chart (Figure 1). Clinical Frailty Scale (CFS score) was assigned to each patient at the beginning and during the FU; patients were classified into three categories: non-frail (CFS 1-4), mild-to-moderately frail (CFS 5-6), and severely frail (CFS 7-9). RESULTS From a total of 1040 NVAF patients, 690 (63.5%) were treated with DOAC (61 dabigatran, 95 rivaroxaban, 254 edoxaban and 280 apixaban) and 350 with VKA. In the VKA group, the mean TTR was 52.8%. Demographic characteristics and CFS score are summarized in table 1. Kaplan-Meier analysis (median FU: 16.5 months) showed a significantly high incidence of stroke/systemic embolism among VKA patients vs DOAC patients (4.2 vs 0.5 events per 100 patient-years, p<0.001). Major bleeding in the DOAC group was significantly infrequent compared with VKA group (2.2 vs 8.9 events, p=0.001). In the DOAC group, 90% (n=20/22) of the major bleedings were gastrointestinal [16 rivaroxaban and 4 edoxaban]. However, in the VKA group 64% (n = 20/31) were gastrointestinal, 25.8% (n= 8/31) intracranial and 9.7% (n = 3/31) urogenital bleedings. We identified 365 very elderly patients (aged ≥ 90 years) of which 270 (39.1%) were DOAC patients and 95 (27.1%) VKA patients. In this subgroup of patients, after a multivariate regression analysis, the stroke/systemic embolism incidence was similar in both treatment groups regardless of the age, but major bleeding decreased significantly in DOAC group (adjusted HR 0.247, 95% CI 0.091-0.664). CONCLUSIONS Our data indicate that DOACs can be a good therapeutic option for stroke/systemic embolism prevention in frail elderly patients, showing low rates of stroke as well as bleeding events when a structured and integral FU is applied to anticoagulated patients. Further investigations are necessary to analyze the impact in the quality of life and net clinical benefit of anticoagulant therapy when a FU program is applied in elderly patients. Disclosures Sierra: Novartis: Honoraria, Research Funding, Speakers Bureau; Astellas: Honoraria; Pfizer: Honoraria; Daiichi-Sankyo: Honoraria, Speakers Bureau; Abbvie: Honoraria, Speakers Bureau; Roche: Honoraria; Jazz Pharmaceuticals: Honoraria.

Abstract P146: Comparative Effectiveness Of Direct Oral Anticoagulants Versus Warfarin Among Medicare Beneficiaries With Atrial Fibrillation

Circulation ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 143 (Suppl_1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Shirin Ardeshirrouhanifard ◽  
Huijun An ◽  
Ravi Goyal ◽  
Mukaila Raji ◽  
Caleb Alexander ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Atrial Fibrillation ◽  
Ischemic Stroke ◽  
Cancer Patients ◽  
Risk Model ◽  
Oral Anticoagulants ◽  
Direct Oral Anticoagulants ◽  
Competing Risk ◽  
Secondary Outcome ◽  
Systemic Embolism ◽  
Competing Risk Model

Objective: Post-hoc analysis of three pivotal clinical trials suggests no difference in risk of ischemic stroke or systemic embolism among cancer patients with atrial fibrillation treated with direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs) vs. warfarin. However, these studies were underpowered and also do not reflect the context of real-world use. We compared the effectiveness of DOACs versus warfarin for the risk of stroke or systemic embolism and all-cause death in patients with NVAF. Methods: We used Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER)-Medicare data from 2009 to 2016 and included patients aged ≥66 years diagnosed with cancer (breast, bladder, colorectal, esophagus, lung, ovary, kidney, pancreas, prostate, stomach or uterus) and NVAF. We limited the cohort to patients who newly initiated warfarin or DOACs (from 2010 to 2016) with no history of ischemic stroke or systemic embolism. The primary outcome was hospitalization due to ischemic stroke or systemic embolism and the secondary outcome was all-cause death. We used Fine and Gray’s competing risk model, while treating death as a competing risk, to determine the association of oral anticoagulants with the incidence of stroke or systemic embolism. We also adjusted the analysis using inverse probability of treatment weighted (IPTW). Additionally, an IPTW-adjusted Cox proportional hazards regression model was constructed for all-cause death. Results: Of 1,028,784 patients with cancer, 158,744 (15.4%) were diagnosed with atrial fibrillation. After applying all inclusion criteria, the final study cohort included 7,334 cancer patients diagnosed with incident NVAF who newly initiated warfarin or DOACs, of which 3,194 (43.6%) used warfarin and 4,140 (56.4%) used DOACs. The unadjusted rate of stroke or systemic embolism was similar among warfarin and DOACs users (1.20 vs. 1.32 cases per 100 person-years, p=0.27). In the IPTW weighted competing risk model, the use of DOACs was not associated with an increased risk of stroke or systemic embolism compared with warfarin users (Hazard Ratio [HR] 1.41, 95% confidence intervals [CI] 0.90-2.20). However, DOACs users had a significantly lower risk of all-cause death compared with warfarin users (HR 0.82, CI 0.74-0.91). Conclusion: Among cancer patients diagnosed with NVAF, DOACs had a similar risk for stroke or systemic embolism compared to warfarin, although DOAC use was associated with reduced risk of all-cause mortality.

scholarly journals The risk of bleeding minimization with direct oral anticoagulants

2021 ◽  
pp. 106-126
Author(s):  
Т. N. Novikova
Keyword(s):  
Atrial Fibrillation ◽  
Clinical Trials ◽  
Anticoagulant Therapy ◽  
Randomized Clinical Trials ◽  
Oral Anticoagulants ◽  
Direct Oral Anticoagulants ◽  
Blood Analysis ◽  
Systemic Embolism ◽  
Risk Of Bleeding ◽  
Wide Range

This review is devoted to the safety issues of anticoagulant therapy prescribed for the prevention of stroke and systemic embolism in patients with atrial fibrillation. Direct oral anticoagulants are considered worldwide in accordance with the guidelines for the diagnosis and treatment of atrial fibrillation as the preferred anticoagulant choice for the prevention of stroke and systemic embolism. Direct oral anticoagulants in comparison with vitamin K antagonists generally have similar efficacy, but different safety profiles, primarily, this concerns the risk of large extracranial and, primarily, gastrointestinal hemorrhages. To minimize the risk of bleeding during therapy with direct oral anticoagulants, an individual approach to the choice of the drug for each individual patient is required after assessing the risk of bleeding, searching for a potential bleeding substrate, correcting existing risk factors and eliminating, if possible, the substrate. When choosing an anticoagulant therapy, special attention should be paid to the most vulnerable categories of patients, such as patients of older age groups and patients with concomitant chronic kidney disease. Among the direct oral anticoagulants registered in the Russian Federation, according to meta-analyzes of key randomized clinical trials and real clinical trials, apixaban has the most optimal benefit: risk ratio in a wide range of patients, including vulnerable populations. Dynamic observation, including regular assessment of renal function, control of clinical blood analysis, erythrocyte and platelet levels, after prescribing an individually selected anticoagulant to the patient, ensures the maximum safety of therapy. Small, so-called, annoying bleeding is not a reason for canceling the anticoagulant, but requires a careful search for the causes of bleeding and their correction.

Comparing Warfarin and 4 Direct Oral Anticoagulants for the Risk of Dementia in Patients With Atrial Fibrillation

Stroke ◽  
2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
So-Ryoung Lee ◽  
Eue-Keun Choi ◽  
Sang-Hyun Park ◽  
Jin-Hyung Jung ◽  
Kyung-Do Han ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Atrial Fibrillation ◽  
Vascular Dementia ◽  
Oral Anticoagulant ◽  
Lower Risk ◽  
Oral Anticoagulants ◽  
Direct Oral Anticoagulants ◽  
Hazard Ratio ◽  
Nonvalvular Atrial Fibrillation ◽  
Weighting Method ◽  
Alzheimer Dementia

Background and Purpose: Atrial fibrillation is a risk factor for dementia, and oral anticoagulant use is associated with a decreased risk of dementia in patients with atrial fibrillation. We aimed to investigate whether the risk of dementia would be different between patients treated with direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs) compared with those with warfarin. Methods: Using the Korean nationwide claims database from January 2014 to December 2017, we identified oral anticoagulant–naive nonvalvular atrial fibrillation patients aged ≥40 years. For the comparisons, warfarin and DOAC groups were balanced using the inverse probability of treatment weighting method. The primary outcome was incident dementia. Results: Among 72 846 of total study patients, 25 948 were treated with warfarin, and 46 898 were treated with DOAC (17 193 with rivaroxaban, 9882 with dabigatran, 11 992 with apixaban, and 7831 with edoxaban). During mean 1.3±1.1 years of follow-up, crude incidence of dementia was 4.87 per 100 person-years (1.20 per 100 person-years for vascular dementia and 3.30 per 100 person-years for Alzheimer dementia). Compared with warfarin, DOAC showed a comparable risks of dementia, vascular dementia, and Alzheimer dementia. In subgroup analyses, DOAC was associated with a lower risk of dementia than warfarin, particularly in patients aged 65 to 74 years (hazard ratio, 0.815 [95% CI, 0.709–0.936]) and in patients with prior stroke (hazard ratio, 0.891 [95% CI, 0.820–0.968]). When comparing individual DOACs with warfarin, edoxaban was associated with a lower risk of dementia (hazard ratio, 0.830 [95% CI, 0.740–0.931]). Conclusions: In this large Asian population with atrial fibrillation, DOAC showed a comparable risk of dementia with warfarin overall. DOACs appeared more beneficial than warfarin, in those aged 65 to 74 years or with a history of stroke. For specific DOACs, only edoxaban was associated with a lower risk of dementia than warfarin.

scholarly journals A survey of reasons for continuing warfarin therapy in the era of direct oral anticoagulants in Japanese patients with atrial fibrillation: the SELECT study

2018 ◽  
Vol Volume 12 ◽  
pp. 135-143 ◽  
Author(s):  
Takanori Ikeda ◽  
Masahiro Yasaka ◽  
Makoto Kida ◽  
Miki Imura
Keyword(s):  
Atrial Fibrillation ◽  
Warfarin Therapy ◽  
Oral Anticoagulants ◽  
Direct Oral Anticoagulants ◽  
Japanese Patients

scholarly journals Management of Direct Oral Anticoagulants in Patients with Atrial Fibrillation Undergoing Cardioversion

Medicina ◽  
2019 ◽  
Vol 55 (10) ◽  
pp. 660 ◽  
Author(s):  
Giuseppe Coppola ◽  
Girolamo Manno ◽  
Antonino Mignano ◽  
Mirko Luparelli ◽  
Antonino Zarcone ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Atrial Fibrillation ◽  
Normal Sinus Rhythm ◽  
Oral Anticoagulants ◽  
Direct Oral Anticoagulants ◽  
Rapid Onset ◽  
Systemic Embolism ◽  
Normal Sinus ◽  
Points Of View ◽  
Atrial Thrombi

Atrial fibrillation the most common cardiac arrhythmia. Its incidence rises steadily with each decade, becoming a real “epidemic phenomenon”. Cardioversion is defined as a rhythm control strategy which, if successful, restores normal sinus rhythm. This, whether obtained with synchronized shock or with drugs, involves a periprocedural risk of stroke and systemic embolism which is reduced by adequate anticoagulant therapy in the weeks before or by the exclusion of left atrial thrombi. Direct oral anticoagulants are safe, manageable, and provide rapid onset of oral anticoagulation; they are an important alternative to heparin/warfarin from all points of view, with a considerable reduction in bleedings and increase in the safety and quality of life of patients.

scholarly journals Comparative Effectiveness of Rivaroxaban, Apixaban, and Warfarin in Atrial Fibrillation Patients With Polypharmacy

Stroke ◽  
2020 ◽  
Vol 51 (7) ◽  
pp. 2076-2086 ◽  
Author(s):  
Amgad Mentias ◽  
Eric Heller ◽  
Mary Vaughan Sarrazin
Keyword(s):  
Atrial Fibrillation ◽  
Ischemic Stroke ◽  
Comparative Effectiveness ◽  
Oral Anticoagulants ◽  
Bleeding Risk ◽  
Hazard Ratio ◽  
Adjusted Hazard Ratio ◽  
Study Cohort ◽  
Prescription Medications ◽  
Risk Of Death

Background and Purpose: Comparative effectiveness and safety of oral anticoagulants in patients with atrial fibrillation and high polypharmacy are unknown. Methods: We used Medicare administrative data to evaluate patients with new atrial fibrillation diagnosis from 2015 to 2017, who initiated an oral anticoagulant within 90 days of diagnosis. Patients taking ≤3, 4 to 8, or ≥9 other prescription medications were categorized as having low, moderate, or high polypharmacy, respectively. Within polypharmacy categories, patients receiving apixaban 5 mg twice daily, rivaroxaban 20 mg once daily, or warfarin were matched using a 3-way propensity score matching. Study outcomes included ischemic stroke, bleeding, and all-cause mortality. Results: The study cohort included 6985 patients using apixaban, 3838 using rivaroxaban, and 6639 using warfarin. In the propensity-matched cohorts there was no difference in risk of ischemic stroke between the 3 drugs in patients with low and moderate polypharmacy. However, among patients with high polypharmacy, the risk of ischemic stroke was higher with apixaban compared with warfarin (adjusted hazard ratio 2.34 [95% CI, 1.01–5.42]; P =0.05) and similar to rivaroxaban (adjusted hazard ratio, 1.38 [95% CI, 0.67–2.84]; P =0.4). There was no difference in risk of death between the 3 drugs in patients with low and moderate polypharmacy, but apixaban was associated with a higher risk of death compared with rivaroxaban (adjusted hazard ratio, 2.03 [95% CI, 1.01–4.08]; P =0.05) in the high polypharmacy group. Apixaban had lower bleeding risk compared with warfarin in the low polypharmacy group (adjusted hazard ratio, 0.54 [95% CI, 0.32–0.90]; P =0.02), but there was no difference in bleeding between the 3 drugs in the moderate and high polypharmacy groups. Conclusions: Our study suggests that among patients with significant polypharmacy (>8 drugs), there may be a higher stroke and mortality risk with apixaban compared with warfarin and rivaroxaban. However, differences were of borderline significance.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document