Dental x-ray exposure of sites within the head and neck

1966 ◽  
Vol 52 (10) ◽  
pp. 787
Keyword(s):  
2012 ◽  
Vol 22 (2) ◽  
pp. 225-230 ◽  
Author(s):  
Paula Boaventura ◽  
Rosa Oliveira ◽  
Dina Pereira ◽  
Paula Soares ◽  
José Teixeira-Gomes

1983 ◽  
Vol 105 (4) ◽  
pp. 316-320 ◽  
Author(s):  
J. M. Kabo ◽  
W. Goldsmith ◽  
N. M. Harris

Two unembalmed and one embalmed human cadaveric head-neck systems were instrumented and subjected to central forehead impact of ballistically suspended 3.07-kg aluminum shell at velocities ranging from 50 to 345 cm/s. Occipital skull accelerations and disk pressures were measured by transducers, while the deformation of the system was determined by framing camera data. The results were found to be in accord with those from corresponding tests in artifical head-neck replica. Initial and terminal X-ray examination of the structure revealed no evidence of either skull or vertebral fractures.


PLoS ONE ◽  
2016 ◽  
Vol 11 (7) ◽  
pp. e0156544 ◽  
Author(s):  
Daniel Grossi Marconi ◽  
Bruno da Costa Resende ◽  
Erick Rauber ◽  
Paula de Cassia Soares ◽  
Jose Maria Fernandes ◽  
...  

2008 ◽  
Vol 122 (9) ◽  
pp. 961-966 ◽  
Author(s):  
S C L Leong ◽  
F Javed ◽  
S Elliot ◽  
S Mortimore

AbstractObjectives:To evaluate the benefits of chest computed tomography and X-ray as screening tools in patients with newly diagnosed head and neck squamous cell carcinoma, to determine the incidence of lung metastases or synchronous pulmonary lesions, and to evaluate factors associated with positive radiological findings.Design:Five-year, retrospective survey of all newly diagnosed cases of head and neck squamous cell carcinoma.Results:We included 102 patients (63 men and 39 women), with a mean age of 67 years (range 33–91 years). The incidence of pulmonary involvement was 17 per cent. The sensitivity and specificity of computed tomography were 100 and 89.8 per cent, respectively. For chest X-ray, the sensitivity was 35.7 per cent and the specificity 92.7 per cent. The accuracy of computed tomography was 91.5 per cent and that of chest X-ray 83.1 per cent. There was a clear correlation between higher nodal stage and larger tumour with the development of distant metastases. In patients with a positive chest computed tomography scan, 86 per cent had T3or T4tumours, in contrast to 38 per cent of those with a negative chest scan (p < 0.05). In addition, 71 per cent of patients with positive findings had N2or N3nodal disease, compared with 29 per cent of those with negative findings (p < 0.05).Conclusion:There is currently no consensus on the use of chest X-ray and computer tomography for screening newly diagnosed cases of head and neck squamous cell carcinoma. We recommend routine scanning of high-staged head and neck squamous cell carcinoma. The National Institute of Health and Clinical Excellence guidelines should be reappraised.


2021 ◽  
Vol 8 (1) ◽  
pp. 3-13
Author(s):  
Li Wang ◽  
Piero Fossati ◽  
Harald Paganetti ◽  
Li Ma ◽  
Maura Gillison ◽  
...  

Abstract Head and neck squamous cell carcinomas (HNSCCs) often present as local-regionally advanced disease at diagnosis, for which a current standard of care is x-ray–based radiation therapy, with or without chemotherapy. This approach provides effective local regional tumor control, but at the cost of acute and late toxicity that can worsen quality of life and contribute to mortality. For patients with human papillomavirus (HPV)–associated oropharyngeal squamous cell carcinoma (SCC) in particular, for whom the prognosis is generally favorable, de-escalation of the radiation dose to surrounding normal tissues without diminishing the radiation dose to tumors is desired to mitigate radiation-related toxic effects. Proton radiation therapy (PRT) may be an excellent de-escalation strategy because of its physical properties (that eliminate unnecessary radiation to surrounding tissues) and because of its biological properties (including tumor-specific variations in relative biological effectiveness [RBE] and linear energy transfer [LET]), in combination with concurrent systemic therapy. Early clinical evidence has shown that compared with x-ray–based radiation therapy, PRT offers comparable disease control with fewer and less severe treatment-related toxicities that can worsen the quality of life for patients with HNSCC. Herein, we review aspects of the biological basis of enhanced HNSCC cell response to proton versus x-ray irradiation in terms of radiation-induced gene and protein expression, DNA damage and repair, cell death, tumor immune responses, and radiosensitization of tumors.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document