Expression of class II antigens by subsets of activated T cells

1986 ◽  
Vol 100 (2) ◽  
pp. 525-531 ◽  
Author(s):  
Karen S. Zier
1991 ◽  
Vol 21 (1) ◽  
pp. 123-129 ◽  
Author(s):  
Niels Ødum ◽  
Paul J. Martin ◽  
Gary L. Schieven ◽  
John A. Hansen ◽  
Jeffrey A. Ledbetter

1986 ◽  
pp. 374-385 ◽  
Author(s):  
V. Corredor ◽  
Y. Matsui ◽  
E. J. Yunis
Keyword(s):  
T Cells ◽  
Class Ii ◽  

1992 ◽  
Vol 35 (1) ◽  
pp. 50-59 ◽  
Author(s):  
Assia Eljaafari ◽  
Isabelle Dorval ◽  
Dominique Zeliszewski ◽  
Sylvie Le Gac ◽  
Ghislaine Sterkers

1987 ◽  
Vol 17 (11) ◽  
pp. 1540-1546 ◽  
Author(s):  
Mireille Viguier ◽  
Vincent Lotteau ◽  
Dominique Charron ◽  
Patrice Debré

1997 ◽  
Vol 352 (1359) ◽  
pp. 1327-1330 ◽  
Author(s):  
Brigitte Müller ◽  
Avrion Mitchison

It has long been known that certain MHC class II genes can dominantly suppress immune responses and so increase susceptibility to parasite infections, but the mechanism has been unclear. Recent work has revealed one way in which this form of suppression may operate through gating by MHC class II molecules of the back–signal from activated T cells into macrophages. The two known suppressive genes of the mouse are expressed in macrophages more extensively than are other class II genes. This is asscociated with suppresion of IL–4 production resulting, we infer, from overproduction in the macrophages of IL–12, the counter–cytokine to IL–4. The lack of IL–4 may itself be immunosuppressive, even for Th2 responses, and excess IL–12 can overinduce the antiproliferative cytokine IFN–gamma. Although this mechanism requires further substantiation, we believe that it offers a reasonable answer to an old conundrum.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document