The ambiguity of recognition memory tests of schema theories

1984 ◽  
Vol 16 (4) ◽  
pp. 421-448 ◽  
Author(s):  
Anne Locksley ◽  
Charles Stangor ◽  
Christine Hepburn ◽  
Ellen Grosovsky ◽  
Mariann Hochstrasser
2020 ◽  
Vol 228 (4) ◽  
pp. 264-277 ◽  
Author(s):  
Evan E. Mitton ◽  
Chris M. Fiacconi

Abstract. To date there has been relatively little research within the domain of metamemory that examines how individuals monitor their performance during memory tests, and whether the outcome of such monitoring informs subsequent memory predictions for novel items. In the current study, we sought to determine whether spontaneous monitoring of test performance can in fact help individuals better appreciate their memory abilities, and in turn shape future judgments of learning (JOLs). Specifically, in two experiments we examined recognition memory for visual images across three study-test cycles, each of which contained novel images. We found that across cycles, participants’ JOLs did in fact increase, reflecting metacognitive sensitivity to near-perfect levels of recognition memory performance. This finding suggests that individuals can and do monitor their test performance in the absence of explicit feedback, and further underscores the important role that test experience can play in shaping metacognitive evaluations of learning and remembering.


1992 ◽  
Vol 5 (1) ◽  
pp. 23-26 ◽  
Author(s):  
H. Ellis ◽  
K. De Pauw ◽  
G. N. Christodoulou ◽  
J.-P. Luaute ◽  
E. Bidault ◽  
...  

Preliminary data are reported from experiments in which Warrington's (1984) Recognition Memory Tests were given to patients with misidentification delusions including the Capgras type and to psychotic patients. The results showed a profound impairment on face recognition for most groups, especially those with the Capgras delusion. It was rare to find a patent whose score on the word test was anything but normal.


1997 ◽  
Vol 111 (6) ◽  
pp. 1163-1170 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jonathan M. Reed ◽  
Stephen B. Hamann ◽  
Lisa Stefanacci ◽  
Larry R. Squire

2019 ◽  
Author(s):  
Regine Bader ◽  
Axel Mecklinger ◽  
Patric Meyer

AbstractFamiliarity-based discrimination between studied target items and similar foils in yes/no recognition memory tests is relatively poor. According to the complementary learning systems (CLS) framework this is due do a relatively small difference in familiarity strength between these two item classes. The model, however, also predicts that when targets and corresponding similar foils are presented next to each other in a forced-choice corresponding (FCC) test format, familiarity values for targets and foils can be directly compared because in each trial, targets are reliably more familiar than their corresponding foils. In contrast, when forced-choice displays contain non-corresponding foils (FCNC) which are similar to other studied items (but not the target), familiarity should not be diagnostic because familiarity values are not directly comparable (as in yes/no-tasks). We compared ERP old/new effects (ERPs of targets vs. foils) when participants were tested with FCC vs. FCNC displays after having intentionally encoded pictures of objects. As predicted, the mid-frontal old/new effect which is associated with familiarity was significantly larger in FCC compared to FCNC displays. Moreover, the target-foil amplitude difference predicted the accuracy of the recognition judgment in a given trial. This is one of the very few studies which support the assumption of the CLS framework that the test format can influence the diagnosticity of familiarity. Moreover, it implies that the mid-frontal old/new effect does not reflect the mean difference in the familiarity signal itself between studied and non-studied items but reflects the task-adequate assessment of the familiarity signal.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document