Introduction: Clubfoot is a common congenital deformity with incidence of1-6.8/1000 live births. Ponseti method is
currently the gold standard for treatment of clubfoot which conventionally involves weekly plaster changes. A
prospective comparative study was carried out at our hospital where we compared one group with weekly plaster change to other group with
twice weekly plaster change, using the classical Ponseti protocol of manipulation. A total 50 feet (36 children ), divided into two Methods:
groups, were randomly allocated to either Group 1 – 25 feet(accelerated Ponseti) or Group 2 – 25 feet (standard Ponseti). Group 2 underwent
serial manipulations and casting once a week and Group 1 received manipulations and castings twice a week. Pirani score was documented at the
time of presentation, after each cast, and at the time of removalof nal cast to assess the success of treatment ( Pirani score ≤1). A tota Results: l
43 feet (29 patients) underwent the entire course of treatment, while 7 patients discontinued the treatment during the course of the study. 14
patients, i.e, 21 feet were treated with Accelerated Ponseti Protocol (APP),i.e Group -1, and 15 patients, i.e, 22 feet were treated with Standard
Ponseti Protocol (SPP), i.e Group-2. Mean duration of treatment from the rst cast to tenotomy in the accelerated ponseti protocol group was
20.57 ± 4.5 days (ranging from 12 to 29 days), and in standard ponseti protocol group was 39.66 ± 6.9 days (ranging from 29 to 51 days).
Conclusion: Both the methods proved to be equally efcacious for the management of clubfoot in our study. However, the accelerated method
had an overall shorter treatment duration making it convenient for the parents. As the patient is under direct observation of surgeons,
complications, in any, are detected early and easily. Overall, the accelerated technique is more practical, benecial, and equally efcacious as
standard ponseti technique, providing a more rapid correction of the deformity.