A fifth chloroplast-encoded polypeptide is present in the photosystem II reaction centre complex

FEBS Letters ◽  
1989 ◽  
Vol 242 (2) ◽  
pp. 259-262 ◽  
Author(s):  
A.N. Webber ◽  
L. Packman ◽  
D.J. Chapman ◽  
J. Barber ◽  
J.C. Gray
2017 ◽  
Vol 8 (10) ◽  
pp. 6871-6880 ◽  
Author(s):  
Richard Stones ◽  
Hoda Hossein-Nejad ◽  
Rienk van Grondelle ◽  
Alexandra Olaya-Castro

We investigate the performance of a theoretical photosystem II reaction centre-inspired photocell device through the framework of electron counting statistics. In particular we look at the effect of a structured vibrational environment on the mean current and current noise.


2003 ◽  
Vol 119 (3) ◽  
pp. 376-383 ◽  
Author(s):  
Alexander G. Ivanov ◽  
Prafullachandra Sane ◽  
Vaughan Hurry ◽  
Marianna Król ◽  
Dimitry Sveshnikov ◽  
...  

1988 ◽  
Vol 15 (2) ◽  
pp. 27 ◽  
Author(s):  
C Critchley

In this paper, the evidence supporting two different models for the molecular mechanism of photoinhibition is discussed. One hypothesis centres around the suggestion that photoinhibition is due to the loss of the herbicide-binding Dl polypeptide of photosystem II. The other model suggests that damage to a functional group in the reaction centre is the primary cause of photoinhibition. In order to put the apparent controversy into context, recent developments in our understanding of the structure and function of the photosystem II reaction centre are described. Interpretation and judgement of all available evidence suggest primary photoinhibitory damage to be incurred by the reaction-centre chlorophyll P680 destabilising the apoprotein(s) and eventually resulting in their proteolytic degradation and removal from the photosystem II complex and the thylakoid membrane.


2019 ◽  
Vol 9 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Alonso Zavafer ◽  
Ievgeniia Iermak ◽  
Mun Hon Cheah ◽  
Wah Soon Chow

AbstractThe quenching of chlorophyll fluorescence caused by photodamage of Photosystem II (qI) is a well recognized phenomenon, where the nature and physiological role of which are still debatable. Paradoxically, photodamage to the reaction centre of Photosystem II is supposed to be alleviated by excitation quenching mechanisms which manifest as fluorescence quenchers. Here we investigated the time course of PSII photodamage in vivo and in vitro and that of picosecond time-resolved chlorophyll fluorescence (quencher formation). Two long-lived fluorescence quenching processes during photodamage were observed and were formed at different speeds. The slow-developing quenching process exhibited a time course similar to that of the accumulation of photodamaged PSII, while the fast-developing process took place faster than the light-induced PSII damage. We attribute the slow process to the accumulation of photodamaged PSII and the fast process to an independent quenching mechanism that precedes PSII photodamage and that alleviates the inactivation of the PSII reaction centre.


1993 ◽  
Vol 48 (3-4) ◽  
pp. 191-198 ◽  
Author(s):  
Simon P. Mackay ◽  
Patrick J. O ’Malley

Abstract The prefered binding orientations for the herbicide DCMU within the QB-binding site of the D 1 protein model from a photosystem II reaction centre have been determined. Calculation of the intermolecular energy between the herbicide and the binding site has been instrumental in obtaining optimum positions reinforced by experimental results from mutation studies and herbicide binding to analogous bacterial reaction centres. We have shown that two binding sites are possible, one involving a hydrogen bond to and the other to the Ser 264 residue. In both cases, which are more important for the stabilization of the interactions.


Plant Science ◽  
1996 ◽  
Vol 115 (2) ◽  
pp. 175-182 ◽  
Author(s):  
Eevi Rintamäki ◽  
Riitta Salo ◽  
Antti Koivuniemi ◽  
Eva-Mari Aro

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document