Mutational analysis of the m3 muscarinic receptor: Functional role of proline residues that are highly conserved among all G protein-coupled receptors

Life Sciences ◽  
1993 ◽  
Vol 52 (5-6) ◽  
pp. 557
Author(s):  
J. Wess ◽  
S. Nanavati ◽  
Z. Vogel ◽  
R. Maggio
2002 ◽  
Vol 283 (6) ◽  
pp. H2379-H2388 ◽  
Author(s):  
Guangmao Cheng ◽  
Yoshihiro Iijima ◽  
Yuji Ishibashi ◽  
Dhandapani Kuppuswamy ◽  
George Cooper

One mechanism for the reappearance of G protein-coupled receptors after agonist activation is microtubule-based transport. In pressure-overload cardiac hypertrophy, there is downregulation of G protein-coupled receptors and the appearance of a densified microtubule network extensively decorated by a microtubule-associated protein, MAP 4. Our hypothesis is that overdecoration of a dense microtubule network with this structural protein, as in hypertrophied myocardium, would impede receptor recovery. We tested this hypothesis by studying muscarinic acetylcholine receptor (mAChR) internalization and recovery after agonist stimulation in neuroblastoma cells. Exposure of cells to carbachol, a muscarinic receptor agonist, decreased membrane receptor binding activity. After carbachol withdrawal, receptor binding recovered toward the initial value. When microtubules were depolymerized before carbachol withdrawal, mAChR recovery was only 44% of that in intact cells. Cells were then infected with an adenovirus containing MAP 4 cDNA. MAP 4 protein decorated the microtubules extensively, and receptor recovery upon carbachol withdrawal was reduced to 54% of control. Thus muscarinic receptor recovery after agonist exposure is microtubule dependent, and MAP 4 decoration of microtubules inhibits receptor recovery.


Author(s):  
Gayathri Viswanathan ◽  
Argen Mamazhakypov ◽  
Ralph T. Schermuly ◽  
Sudarshan Rajagopal

Biochimie ◽  
2014 ◽  
Vol 107 ◽  
pp. 28-32 ◽  
Author(s):  
Olivier Soubias ◽  
Walter E. Teague ◽  
Kirk G. Hines ◽  
Klaus Gawrisch

2003 ◽  
pp. 105-120
Author(s):  
Andjelka Ćelić ◽  
Sara M. Connelly ◽  
Negin P. Martin ◽  
Mark E. Dumont

2020 ◽  
Vol 21 (11) ◽  
pp. 3932 ◽  
Author(s):  
Preeti Kumari Chaudhary ◽  
Sanggu Kim ◽  
Youngheun Jee ◽  
Seung-Hun Lee ◽  
Kyung-Mee Park ◽  
...  

Platelet G protein-coupled receptors (GPCRs) regulate platelet function by mediating the response to various agonists, including adenosine diphosphate (ADP), thromboxane A2, and thrombin. Although GPCR kinases (GRKs) are considered to have the crucial roles in most GPCR functions, little is known regarding the regulation of GPCR signaling and mechanisms of GPCR desensitization by GRKs in platelets. In this study, we investigated the functional role of GRK6 and the molecular basis for regulation of specific GPCR desensitization by GRK6 in platelets. We used GRK6 knockout mice to evaluate the functional role of GRK6 in platelet activation. Platelet aggregation, dense- and α-granule secretion, and fibrinogen receptor activation induced by 2-MeSADP, U46619, thrombin, and AYPGKF were significantly potentiated in GRK6−/− platelets compared to the wild-type (WT) platelets. However, collagen-related peptide (CRP)-induced platelet aggregation and secretion were not affected in GRK6−/− platelets. Interestingly, platelet aggregation induced by co-stimulation of serotonin and epinephrine which activate Gq-coupled 5HT2A and Gz-coupled α2A adrenergic receptors, respectively, was not affected in GRK6−/− platelets, suggesting that GRK6 was involved in specific GPCR regulation. In addition, platelet aggregation in response to the second challenge of ADP and AYPGKF was restored in GRK6−/− platelets whereas re-stimulation of the agonist failed to induce aggregation in WT platelets, indicating that GRK6 contributed to P2Y1, P2Y12, and PAR4 receptor desensitization. Furthermore, 2-MeSADP-induced Akt phosphorylation and AYPGKF-induced Akt, extracellular signal-related kinase (ERK), and protein kinase Cδ (PKCδ) phosphorylation were significantly potentiated in GRK6−/− platelets. Finally, GRK6−/− mice exhibited an enhanced and stable thrombus formation after FeCl3 injury to the carotid artery and shorter tail bleeding times, indicating that GRK6−/− mice were more susceptible to thrombosis and hemostasis. We conclude that GRK6 plays an important role in regulating platelet functional responses and thrombus formation through selective GPCR desensitization.


2019 ◽  
Vol 119 (04) ◽  
pp. 534-541 ◽  
Author(s):  
Selin Gencer ◽  
Emiel van der Vorst ◽  
Maria Aslani ◽  
Christian Weber ◽  
Yvonne Döring ◽  
...  

AbstractInflammation has been well recognized as one of the main drivers of atherosclerosis development and therefore cardiovascular diseases (CVDs). It has been shown that several chemokines, small 8 to 12 kDa cytokines with chemotactic properties, play a crucial role in the pathophysiology of atherosclerosis. Chemokines classically mediate their effects by binding to G-protein-coupled receptors called chemokine receptors. In addition, chemokines can also bind to atypical chemokine receptors (ACKRs). ACKRs fail to induce G-protein-dependent signalling pathways and thus subsequent cellular response, but instead are able to internalize, scavenge or transport chemokines. In this review, we will give an overview of the current knowledge about the involvement of ACKR1–4 in CVDs and especially in atherosclerosis development. In the recent years, several studies have highlighted the importance of ACKRs in CVDs, although there are still several controversies and unexplored aspects that have to be further elucidated. A better understanding of the precise role of these atypical receptors may pave the way towards novel and improved therapeutic strategies.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document