The performance feedback process: A preliminary model

1984 ◽  
Vol 33 (1) ◽  
pp. 42-76 ◽  
Author(s):  
James R. Larson
Author(s):  
Phillip Brown ◽  
Jennifer Stephenson ◽  
Mark Carter

Over the last decade, the obligation of general and special educators to utilize evidence-based instructional practices has become more prominent. Research increasingly suggests the failure of didactic teacher training alone to ensure implementation with fidelity of these practices by teachers in their classrooms. Multicomponent training (MCT) strategies utilizing didactic presentations, followed by coaching with role-play and specific performance feedback, offer a useful strategy for training teachers of students with severe disabilities in the evidence-based practices of their field. This pilot study successfully demonstrated the efficiency, feasibility, and acceptability of a school-based MCT strategy in the training of four teachers of students with severe disabilities in the use of simultaneous prompting (SP). The MCT strategy utilized demonstrated the efficacy of a research-based performance feedback process. Implications for the comprehensive and rigorous training of teachers of students with severe disabilities are discussed.


2017 ◽  
Vol 30 (4) ◽  
pp. 457-474 ◽  
Author(s):  
Dennis Garvin ◽  
James Worthington ◽  
Shaun McGuire ◽  
Stephanie Burgetz ◽  
Alan J. Forster ◽  
...  

Purpose This paper aims at the implementation and early evaluation of a comprehensive, formative annual physician performance feedback process in a large academic health-care organization. Design/methodology/approach A mixed methods approach was used to introduce a formative feedback process to provide physicians with comprehensive feedback on performance and to support professional development. This initiative responded to organization-wide engagement surveys through which physicians identified effective performance feedback as a priority. In 2013, physicians primarily affiliated with the organization participated in a performance feedback process, and physician satisfaction and participant perceptions were explored through participant survey responses and physician leader focus groups. Training was required for physician leaders prior to conducting performance feedback discussions. Findings This process was completed by 98 per cent of eligible physicians, and 30 per cent completed an evaluation survey. While physicians endorsed the concept of a formative feedback process, process improvement opportunities were identified. Qualitative analysis revealed the following process improvement themes: simplify the tool, ensure leaders follow process, eliminate redundancies in data collection (through academic or licensing requirements) and provide objective quality metrics. Following physician leader training on performance feedback, 98 per cent of leaders who completed an evaluation questionnaire agreed or strongly agreed that the performance feedback process was useful and that training objectives were met. Originality/value This paper introduces a physician performance feedback model, leadership training approach and first-year implementation outcomes. The results of this study will be useful to health administrators and physician leaders interested in implementing physician performance feedback or improving physician engagement.


Author(s):  
Benjamin Schneider ◽  
Gerald E. Ledford Jr.

Perceptions of the effectiveness of performance appraisal and feedback techniques are frequently neutral to negative. This chapter proposes that a focus on techniques for doing appraisal and feedback has been shortsighted and argues that the creation and maintenance of a context delivering honest and effective feedback—here called a feedback climate—is the best way to improve the effectiveness of the feedback process. The feedback climate is defined as the bundle of practices organizations implement to ensure that performance feedback to members of the organization is honest and effective. The strategic climate literature supports the conclusion that the degree to which organizations focus bundles of practices on important processes (e.g. fairness and ethics) leads directly to important outcomes (e.g. safety and customer service). Using a sample of 234 companies, a new measure of feedback climate is developed, and support for it is found as a correlate of positive perceptions of (1) individual employee feedback effectiveness (e.g. developing employee skills and abilities and motivating employees) and (2) organizational feedback effectiveness (e.g. increasing organizational performance and supporting business strategy). In addition, it is indicated that feedback climate is more central to such perceptions of effectiveness than are the usual appraisal/feedback techniques studied by researchers and used by practitioners (including type of ratings used, ratingless reviews, developmental vs. evaluative feedback, crowdsourced feedback, and so forth). Based on results obtained with this new cross-organization diagnostic feedback climate measure, several implications for research and especially for practice are presented.


2020 ◽  
Vol 36 (1) ◽  
pp. 196-206 ◽  
Author(s):  
Almut Rudolph ◽  
Michela Schröder-Abé ◽  
Astrid Schütz

Abstract. In five studies, we evaluated the psychometric properties of a revised German version of the State Self-Esteem Scale (SSES; Heatherton & Polivy, 1991 ). In Study 1, the results of a confirmatory factor analysis on the original scale revealed poor model fit and poor construct validity in a student sample that resembled those in the literature; thus, a revised 15-item version was developed (i.e., the SSES-R) and thoroughly validated. Study 2 showed a valid three-factor structure (Performance, Social, and Appearance) and good internal consistency of the SSES-R. Correlations between subscales of trait and state SE empirically supported the scale’s construct validity. Temporal stability and intrapersonal sensitivity of the scale to naturally occurring events were investigated in Study 3. Intrapersonal sensitivity of the scale to experimentally induced changes in state SE was uncovered in Study 4 via social feedback (acceptance vs. rejection) and performance feedback (positive vs. negative). In Study 5, the scale’s interpersonal sensitivity was confirmed by comparing depressed and healthy individuals. Finally, the usefulness of the SSES-R was demonstrated by assessing SE instability as calculated from repeated measures of state SE.


2010 ◽  
Vol 15 (2) ◽  
pp. 121-131 ◽  
Author(s):  
Remus Ilies ◽  
Timothy A. Judge ◽  
David T. Wagner

This paper focuses on explaining how individuals set goals on multiple performance episodes, in the context of performance feedback comparing their performance on each episode with their respective goal. The proposed model was tested through a longitudinal study of 493 university students’ actual goals and performance on business school exams. Results of a structural equation model supported the proposed conceptual model in which self-efficacy and emotional reactions to feedback mediate the relationship between feedback and subsequent goals. In addition, as expected, participants’ standing on a dispositional measure of behavioral inhibition influenced the strength of their emotional reactions to negative feedback.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document