Preliminary observation on the dietary protein requirement of estuary grouper, Epinephelus salmoides Maxwell, cultured in floating net-cages

Aquaculture ◽  
1978 ◽  
Vol 15 (3) ◽  
pp. 257-271 ◽  
Author(s):  
Seng-Keh Teng ◽  
Thia-Eng Chua ◽  
Phaik-Ee Lim
2004 ◽  
Vol 10 (4) ◽  
pp. 247-252 ◽  
Author(s):  
Z. Luo ◽  
Y.J. Liu ◽  
K.S. Mai ◽  
L.X. Tian ◽  
D.H. Liu ◽  
...  

2009 ◽  
Vol 33 (4) ◽  
pp. 674-681 ◽  
Author(s):  
Xiao-Zhi LIN ◽  
Xiao-Jun XIE ◽  
Yi-Ping LUO

1987 ◽  
Vol 44 (11) ◽  
pp. 1995-2001 ◽  
Author(s):  
Stephen H. Bowen

It is widely believed that fishes require more dietary protein than other vertebrates. Many aspects of fish physiology, nutrition, and trophic ecology have been interpreted within the context of this high protein requirement. Here, fishes are compared with terrestrial homeotherms in terms of (1) protein requirement for maintenance, (2) relative protein concentration in the diet required for maximum growth rate, (3) protein intake rate required for maximum growth rate, (4) efficiency of protein retention in growth, and (5) weight of growth achieved per weight of protein ingested. The two animal groups compared differ only in relative protein concentration in the diet required for maximum growth rate. This difference is explained in terms of homeotherms' greater requirement for energy and does not reflect absolute differences in protein requirement. The remaining measures of protein requirement suggest that fishes and terrestrial homeotherms are remarkably similar in their use of protein as a nutritional resource. Reinterpretation of the role of protein in fish physiology, nutrition, and trophic ecology is perhaps in order.


2014 ◽  
Vol 17 (4) ◽  
pp. 455-459
Author(s):  
Kyoung-Duck Kim ◽  
Kang-Woong Kim ◽  
Bong-Joo Lee ◽  
Maeng Hyun Son ◽  
Hyon-Sob Han ◽  
...  

2005 ◽  
Vol 17 (3) ◽  
pp. 37-50 ◽  
Author(s):  
S. González ◽  
S. R. Craig ◽  
E. McLean ◽  
M. H. Schwarz ◽  
G. J. Flick

2016 ◽  
Vol 48 (5) ◽  
pp. 2064-2073 ◽  
Author(s):  
Chaoxia Ye ◽  
Yanglin Wu ◽  
Zhenzhu Sun ◽  
Anli Wang

2019 ◽  
Vol 316 (5) ◽  
pp. E741-E748 ◽  
Author(s):  
Arash Bandegan ◽  
Glenda Courtney-Martin ◽  
Mahroukh Rafii ◽  
Paul B. Pencharz ◽  
Peter W. R. Lemon

Despite studies indicating increased protein requirements in strength-trained or endurance-trained (ET) individuals, the Institute of Medicine has concluded that “no additional dietary protein is suggested for healthy adults undertaking resistance or endurance exercise,” and the controversy regarding exercise effects on protein requirements continues. The objective of this study was to determine the dietary protein requirement of healthy young ET men (≥1 yr training experience) 24 h post exercise (to minimize any acute effects of the previous training session) by measuring the oxidation of ingested l-[1-13C]phenylalanine to 13CO2 in response to graded intakes of protein (indicator amino acid oxidation technique). Eight men [maximal oxygen consumption 64.1 ml·kg−1·min−1 (SD 3.7)] were each studied 24 h postexercise repeatedly with protein intakes ranging from 0.3 to 3.5 g·kg−1·day−1. Protein was fed as an amino acid mixture based on the protein pattern in egg, except for phenylalanine and tyrosine, which were maintained at constant amounts across all protein intakes. For 2 days before the study day, all participants consumed 1.6 g protein·kg−1·day−1. The estimated average requirement (EAR) for protein was determined by applying a nonlinear mixed-effects change-point regression analysis to F13CO2 (label tracer oxidation in 13CO2 breath), which identified a breakpoint in the F13CO2 in response to the graded amounts of protein. The EAR for protein and the upper 95% confidence interval were 2.1 and 2.6 g·kg−1·day−1, respectively. These data suggest that the protein EAR for ET men 24 h postexercise exceeds the Institute of Medicine EAR and established athlete guidelines by ~3.5- and 1.3-fold, respectively.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document