Aspects of the reproductive biology of the sharpsnout seabream Diplodus puntazzo (Cetti, 1777). I. Gametogenesis and gonadal cycle in captivity during the third year of life

Aquaculture ◽  
1996 ◽  
Vol 140 (3) ◽  
pp. 281-291 ◽  
Author(s):  
Valeria Micale ◽  
Francesco Perdichizzi ◽  
Giovanni Basciano
1959 ◽  
Vol 37 (5) ◽  
pp. 627-631 ◽  
Author(s):  
J. K. Reynolds ◽  
R. H. Stinson

Certain aspects of the reproductive biology and growth of the European hare, Lepus europaeus hybridus Desmarest, were studied in 1949–52 in southwestern Ontario. The breeding season began in January and declined in August, reaching its height between the second week of February and the third week of June when all females examined were pregnant. The litter size varied from one to four; an average of 1.6 foetuses occurred in the early litters (January–March) and 3.8 in later litters (April–June). One young raised in captivity grew to adult weight (4100 g) in 6 months.


2013 ◽  
Vol 89 (2) ◽  
pp. 217-231 ◽  
Author(s):  
N. Sánchez-García ◽  
A.E. Ahuir-Baraja ◽  
J.A. Raga ◽  
F.E. Montero

AbstractOne of the fish species with the highest potential for aquaculture is the sharpsnout seabream, Diplodus puntazzo Cetti. Among other aspects, the development of new fish cultures requires studies of potential pathogens that may compromise survival of the fish in captivity. Moreover, both cultured and wild fish can act as sources or reservoirs of pathogens which may negatively affect other well-established cultures. We have studied the parasite fauna of the wild sharpsnout seabream, and monitored the survival of the parasites in culture conditions. The sharpsnout seabream was sampled from two different Spanish localities and examined for parasites. Additionally, 20 fish were maintained in captivity. Ten of them were examined for parasites after a period of 10 days and a further ten fish after another 10 days. All fish were parasitized with at least four species, with 19 parasite species being identified, seven of which were recorded for the first time in the sharpsnout seabream. These included Microcotyle sp., Magnibursatus bartolii, Steringotrema pagelli, Galactosomum sp., Cardiocephaloides longicollis, Caligus ligusticus and Gnathia vorax. We also report the first records of two parasite species in the wild sharpsnout seabream, the polyopisthocotylean monogeneans Atrispinum seminalis and Sparicotyle chrysophrii. Previously, these parasites had only been recorded in farmed sharpsnout seabream. Most parasites in the skin, gills and alimentary tract disappeared under the conditions of captivity, with the exception of the monogeneans of the genus Lamellodiscus. The information provided about the sharpsnout seabream parasite fauna will be useful to prevent possible problems in fish farms due to some parasite species. Many parasites of the sharpsnout seabream recorded in the present study are shared by the main fish species in Mediterranean aquaculture, the gilthead seabream, thus suggesting the possibility of cross-infections.


Author(s):  
Lachlan Mcleay ◽  
C.G. Alexander

Combining the use of scanning electron microscopy and microcinematography with functional and behavioural observations has clarified many aspects underlying the feeding processes of the small planktonic sergestid shrimp Acetes sibogae australis. In captivity Acetes sibogae australis is an opportunistic feeder that uses four principal feeding modes to capture a wide size range of prey: Artemia nauplii (<0.33 mm), copepods (<1mm) and moribund Acetes (up to 25 mm). Prey capture is effected by combined actions of the first three pairs of pereiopods and the third maxillipeds before transfer to the more dorsal second maxillipeds. The second maxillipeds are the principal appendages used in securing, manipulating, sorting and rejecting prey before insertion into the vicinity of the inner mouthparts.


2020 ◽  
pp. 100-169
Author(s):  
Kevin Riehle

The third group broke with the Soviet system during World War II and immediately thereafter. In the months after Operation Barbarossa began on 22 June 1941, German forces penetrated deep into Soviet territory, and it is likely that thousands of Soviet intelligence and state security personnel fell into German captivity during that time. Consequently, Germany was the clear intelligence priority early in the war. Of the 32 officers in this group, 18 were captured on the battlefield between 1941 and 1943, most of which defected once they were in captivity. However, Soviet intelligence widened its targeting beyond Germany to its wartime allies even before the war ended. A few others were abroad under diplomatic cover and approached a foreign power requesting asylum. This group extends beyond the formal end of World War II into 1946, because the environment for defectors did not change immediately after the war.


Aquaculture ◽  
2007 ◽  
Vol 263 (1-4) ◽  
pp. 211-219 ◽  
Author(s):  
M.A. Piedecausa ◽  
M.J. Mazón ◽  
B. García García ◽  
M.D. Hernández

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document