Children leaving foster care: Outcomes of permanency planning

1984 ◽  
Vol 8 (4) ◽  
pp. 425-431 ◽  
Author(s):  
Edith Fein ◽  
Anthony Maluccio
1984 ◽  
Vol 9 (3) ◽  
pp. 7-12 ◽  
Author(s):  
Anthony N. Maluccio ◽  
Edith Fein ◽  
Jane Hamilton ◽  
Jo Lynn Klier ◽  
Darryl Ward

With permanency planning taking the spotlight increasingly in the field of foster care, i t becomes urgent to examine the definition of permanency, the effect on practice, and the implications for service delivery.


1993 ◽  
Vol 10 (4) ◽  
pp. 329-341 ◽  
Author(s):  
Eric C. Albers ◽  
Thom Reilly ◽  
Barbara Rittner

2011 ◽  
Author(s):  
Michelle R. Stone ◽  
Jacqueline R. Wall ◽  
Steven M. Koch ◽  
Jessica L. Neukam

PEDIATRICS ◽  
1994 ◽  
Vol 93 (2) ◽  
pp. 335-338 ◽  
Author(s):  

The foster care system in America has evolved as a means of providing protection and shelter for children who require out-of-home placement.1 It is designed to be a temporary service, with a goal of either returning children home or arranging for suitable adoptive homes. In recent years, child welfare agencies have been directing greater efforts toward supporting families in crisis to prevent foster care placements whenever feasible and to reunify families as soon as possible when placements cannot be avoided. Increasingly, extended family members are being recruited and assisted in providing kinship care for children when their biologic parents cannot care for them. However, during the past decade the number of children in foster care has nearly doubled, despite landmark federal legislation designed to expedite permanency planning for children in state custody.2 It is estimated that by 1995 more than 500 000 children will be in foster care.3 In large part, this unrelenting trend is the result of increased abuse and neglect of children occurring in the context of parental substance abuse, mental illness, homelessness, and human immunodeficiency virus infection.4 As a result, a disproportionate number of children placed in foster care come from that segment of the population with the fewest social and financial resources and from families that have few personal and limited extended family sources of support.5 It is not surprising then that children entering foster care are often in poor health. Compared with children from the same socioeconomic background, they suffer much higher rates of serious emotional and behavioral problems, chronic physical disabilities, birth defects, developmental delays, and poor school achievement.6-13


2016 ◽  
Vol 54 (5) ◽  
pp. 299-315 ◽  
Author(s):  
Elspeth M. Slayter

Abstract The promotion of speedy, permanent outcomes for foster children is a central child welfare policy goal. However, while children with intellectual disability (ID) are at greater risk for child welfare involvement, little is known about their case outcomes. This cross-sectional national study explores between-group foster care outcomes. Foster children with intellectual disability were more likely to have experienced an adoption disruption or dissolution but less likely to be reunified with a parent, primary caretaker or other family member. Implications for interagency collaboration in support of pre and post-foster care discharge support services are discussed.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document