After foster care: Outcomes of permanency planning for children special issue of child welfare, 52(6), 1983.

1985 ◽  
Vol 7 (2-3) ◽  
pp. 269-273
Author(s):  
Rogers T. Yoshikami
Keyword(s):  
Foster Care ◽  
Child Welfare ◽  
Permanency Planning ◽  
Special Issue ◽  
Care Outcomes

Children leaving foster care: Outcomes of permanency planning

1984 ◽  
Vol 8 (4) ◽  
pp. 425-431 ◽  
Author(s):  
Edith Fein ◽  
Anthony Maluccio
Keyword(s):  
Foster Care ◽  
Permanency Planning ◽  
Care Outcomes

Foster Care Outcomes for Children With Intellectual Disability

2016 ◽  
Vol 54 (5) ◽  
pp. 299-315 ◽  
Author(s):  
Elspeth M. Slayter
Keyword(s):  
Intellectual Disability ◽  
Foster Care ◽  
Child Welfare ◽  
Foster Children ◽  
National Study ◽  
Cross Sectional ◽  
Child Welfare Policy ◽  
Care Outcomes ◽  
Outcomes For Children ◽  
Children With Intellectual Disability

Abstract The promotion of speedy, permanent outcomes for foster children is a central child welfare policy goal. However, while children with intellectual disability (ID) are at greater risk for child welfare involvement, little is known about their case outcomes. This cross-sectional national study explores between-group foster care outcomes. Foster children with intellectual disability were more likely to have experienced an adoption disruption or dissolution but less likely to be reunified with a parent, primary caretaker or other family member. Implications for interagency collaboration in support of pre and post-foster care discharge support services are discussed.

Child Welfare Finance and Foster Care Outcomes

2015 ◽  
Vol 9 (2) ◽  
pp. 134-152 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jesse Russell
Keyword(s):  
Foster Care ◽  
Child Welfare ◽  
Care Outcomes

A Comparison of Foster Care Outcomes Across Four Child Welfare Agencies

2003 ◽  
Vol 7 (2) ◽  
pp. 55-72 ◽  
Author(s):  
Matthew Mason ◽  
Lynn M. Castrianno ◽  
Christy Kessler ◽  
Linda Holmstrand ◽  
Jonathan Huefner ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Foster Care ◽  
Child Welfare ◽  
Child Welfare Agencies ◽  
Care Outcomes ◽  
Welfare Agencies

Permanency Planning: a redefinition

1984 ◽  
Vol 9 (2) ◽  
pp. 3-5 ◽  
Author(s):  
Anthony N. Maluccio ◽  
Edith Fein
Keyword(s):  
Social Work ◽  
Foster Care ◽  
Child Welfare ◽  
Theory And Practice ◽  
Permanency Planning ◽  
Review Of The Literature ◽  
Underlying Theory ◽  
Practice Method ◽  
Decisive Action ◽  
Definition Of

As a practice method, permanency planning has been on the scene long enough to require re-evaluation of its underlying theory and implications for social work. The authors therefore offer a comprehensive definition of permanency planning and describe its major features in detail.Concern about the phenomenon of drift in foster care has given rise to the practice called permanency planning — the process of taking prompt, decisive action to maintain children in their own homes or place them permanently with other families. This is an important movement in child welfare, and there is a continuing need to clarify its meaning so as to promote its development in theory and practice. Following a brief review of the literature, we therefore propose a comprehensive definition of permanency planning and delineate its major components.

scholarly journals Sustainability of Families and Child Welfare

2021 ◽  
Vol 13 (14) ◽  
pp. 7556
Author(s):  
Juha Hämäläinen ◽  
Riitta Vornanen ◽  
Kaisa Pihlainen
Keyword(s):  
Child Welfare ◽  
Social Development ◽  
Special Issue

This special issue deals specifically with the sustainability of families and child welfare with respect to sustainable social development [...]

Foster Care Factors and Permanency for Children With Substance-Related Removals

2020 ◽  
pp. 104438942094722
Author(s):  
Margaret H. Lloyd Sieger
Keyword(s):  
Substance Use ◽  
Foster Care ◽  
Child Welfare ◽  
High Risk ◽  
Substance Use Disorder ◽  
Care Setting ◽  
Foster Parent ◽  
Vulnerable Group ◽  
Children In Foster Care ◽  
Socioeconomic Risk

Children in foster care due to parental substance use disorder are at high risk for delayed permanency. Understudied is the effect of foster care factors on these children’s exits from care. This study analyzed 10 years of federal child welfare data to understand the effect of foster care placement, provider, and support factors for this vulnerable group. Results revealed that several foster care variables influenced time to, and likelihood of, permanency for children with substance-related removals. Foster care setting, foster parent age and race, and several types of federal supports affected permanency trajectories. Children in homes receiving more federal supports were less likely to achieve permanency, suggesting the insufficiency of these supports to counteract the effects of socioeconomic risk on permanency.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document