Rats can learn a roughness discrimination using only their vibrissal system

1989 ◽  
Vol 31 (3) ◽  
pp. 285-289 ◽  
Author(s):  
E. Guić-Robles ◽  
C. Valdivieso ◽  
G. Guajardo
2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Munendo Fujimichi ◽  
Hiroki Yamamoto ◽  
Jun Saiki

Are visual representations in the human early visual cortex necessary for visual working memory (VWM)? Previous studies suggest that VWM is underpinned by distributed representations across several brain regions, including the early visual cortex. Notably, in these studies, participants had to memorize images under consistent visual conditions. However, in our daily lives, we must retain the essential visual properties of objects despite changes in illumination or viewpoint. The role of brain regions—particularly the early visual cortices—in these situations remains unclear. The present study investigated whether the early visual cortex was essential for achieving stable VWM. Focusing on VWM for object surface properties, we conducted fMRI experiments while male and female participants performed a delayed roughness discrimination task in which sample and probe spheres were presented under varying illumination. By applying multi-voxel pattern analysis to brain activity in regions of interest, we found that the ventral visual cortex and intraparietal sulcus were involved in roughness VWM under changing illumination conditions. In contrast, VWM was not supported as robustly by the early visual cortex. These findings show that visual representations in the early visual cortex alone are insufficient for the robust roughness VWM representation required during changes in illumination.


PM&R ◽  
2019 ◽  
Vol 11 (10) ◽  
pp. 1083-1092
Author(s):  
Terry Gorst ◽  
Jenny Freeman ◽  
Kielan Yarrow ◽  
Jonathan Marsden

2020 ◽  
Vol 10 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Roberta D. Roberts ◽  
Aldrin R. Loomes ◽  
Harriet A. Allen ◽  
Massimiliano Di Luca ◽  
Alan M. Wing

Neurology ◽  
1997 ◽  
Vol 49 (1) ◽  
pp. 168-177 ◽  
Author(s):  
K. Sathian ◽  
A. Zangaladze ◽  
J. Green ◽  
J. L. Vitek ◽  
M. R. DeLong

1994 ◽  
Vol 72 (5) ◽  
pp. 583-590 ◽  
Author(s):  
Allan M. Smith

The question of whether friction contributes to the perception of roughness has been overdebated and underinvestigated. A review of the psychophysical literature suggests that roughness and friction can be subjectively distinguished very effectively, although the same rapidly adapting Meissner corpuscles (RA1s) and slowly adapting Merkel receptors (SA1s) are stimulated by both stimuli. It appears that to achieve the subjective appreciation of roughness, the brain must learn to ignore variations in the speed of movement over the skin, the perpendicular force applied to the receptor surface, and the shear forces tangential to the skin generated by friction. Similarly, the subjective appreciation of slipperiness requires selective attention to tangential forces to the exclusion of speed, perpendicular force, and surface texture. A clearer picture is gradually emerging concerning the detection and appreciation of shear forces from investigations of the grasping and lifting of objects of different surfaces against the force of gravity. Although high shear forces provoke larger responses in almost all skin mechanoreceptors, some neurons in both the sensory and motor cortex discharge more vigorously with smooth textures and lower coefficients of friction. Although populations of such neurons sensitive to smooth surfaces and low friction would be very useful in detecting both potential and real slips, just how the afferent signals are derived remains puzzling.Key words: cutaneous sensation, friction, grip force, roughness, shear force, surface texture.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document