Nucleotide sequence of circular DNA molecules homologous to the 240 bp tandem repeats of the intergenic spacer of Drosophila melanogaster ribosomal DNA

1990 ◽  
Vol 69 (1) ◽  
pp. 69-70
Author(s):  
Fabienne Degroote ◽  
Sylvaine Renault ◽  
Georges Picard
Genome ◽  
1993 ◽  
Vol 36 (2) ◽  
pp. 244-254 ◽  
Author(s):  
S. Renault ◽  
F. Degroote ◽  
G. Picard

A sequence (scl) belonging to the recently identified dodeca satellite family was found to be a major family of extrachromosomal circular DNA molecules from Drosophila melanogaster embryos. The basic unit consists of the 11-bp repeat 5′ ACTGGTCCCGT 3′, is 63% G + C rich, and shares some similarity with the Escherichia coli chi sequence. This family accounts for only about 0.06% of the genome but very likely for a higher proportion of the circular DNA molecules. It is organized in the genome into at least five main clusters contained in DNA fragments larger than 20 kb and several minor clusters. These clusters are located in the heterochromatic pericentromeric regions. Two other families of simple repeated sequences, the 1.686 g/cm3 (5′ AATAACATAG 3′) and the 1.705 g/cm3 (5′ AAGAG 3′) satellite DNAs, were also found in circular DNAs, while another family, the 1.672 g/cm3 (5′ AATAT 3′), was not detected. The representation of the simple repeated sequences in circular molecules is not correlated to their genomic representation. Among the seven families of sequences identified to date in extrachromosomal circular DNAs from embryos, the dodeca satellite, the 240-bp repeat of the rDNA intergenic spacer, and the 1.688 and 1.705 g/cm3 satellite DNAs are the most represented families, while the 5S genes, the histone genes, and the 1.686 g/cm3 satellite DNA are present in a lower amount.Key words: D. melanogaster, extrachromosomal circular DNAs, repeated sequences, satellite DNA.


Cells ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 10 (2) ◽  
pp. 196
Author(s):  
Evgeny Smirnov ◽  
Nikola Chmúrčiaková ◽  
František Liška ◽  
Pavla Bažantová ◽  
Dušan Cmarko

In human cells, ribosomal DNA (rDNA) is arranged in ten clusters of multiple tandem repeats. Each repeat is usually described as consisting of two parts: the 13 kb long ribosomal part, containing three genes coding for 18S, 5.8S and 28S RNAs of the ribosomal particles, and the 30 kb long intergenic spacer (IGS). However, this standard scheme is, amazingly, often altered as a result of the peculiar instability of the locus, so that the sequence of each repeat and the number of the repeats in each cluster are highly variable. In the present review, we discuss the causes and types of human rDNA instability, the methods of its detection, its distribution within the locus, the ways in which it is prevented or reversed, and its biological significance. The data of the literature suggest that the variability of the rDNA is not only a potential cause of pathology, but also an important, though still poorly understood, aspect of the normal cell physiology.


Genetics ◽  
1991 ◽  
Vol 129 (1) ◽  
pp. 119-132 ◽  
Author(s):  
R S Rasooly ◽  
L G Robbins

Abstract The Rex locus of Drosophila melanogaster induces a high frequency of mitotic exchange between two separated ribosomal DNA arrays on a single chromosome. The exchanges take place in the progeny of Rex mothers and occur very early, before the third mitotic division. A number of common laboratory stocks have also been found to carry dominant suppressors of Rex (Su(Rex)). Rex was mapped to the X centric heterochromatin, proximal to su(f), by genetic and molecular analysis of two spontaneous recombinants. Using deficiencies and duplications of the heterochromatin, both Rex and one Su(Rex) were shown to behave as neomorphs. Rex-induced exchange in a target chromosome bearing both Rex and Su(Rex) was then used to map these functions to the bb locus itself. Molecular analysis of the recombinants, using length variants of the ribosomal DNA intergenic spacer as genetic markers, mapped Su(Rex) and Rex within the bb locus and demonstrated that both are repeated elements.


1989 ◽  
Vol 13 (2) ◽  
pp. 251-253 ◽  
Author(s):  
Waltraud Schmidt-Puchta ◽  
Isolde G�nther ◽  
Heinz L. S�nger

2018 ◽  
Vol 51 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Sohail Akhtar ◽  
Muhammad Nouman Tahir ◽  
Imran Amin ◽  
Rana Binyamin ◽  
Shahid Mansoor

Genetics ◽  
1999 ◽  
Vol 153 (2) ◽  
pp. 753-762
Author(s):  
Günther E Roth ◽  
Sigrid Wattler ◽  
Hartmut Bornschein ◽  
Michael Lehmann ◽  
Günter Korge

Abstract The Drosophila melanogaster gene Sgs-1 belongs to the secretion protein genes, which are coordinately expressed in salivary glands of third instar larvae. Earlier analysis had implied that Sgs-1 is located at the 25B2-3 puff. We cloned Sgs-1 from a YAC covering 25B2-3. Despite using a variety of vectors and Escherichia coli strains, subcloning from the YAC led to deletions within the Sgs-1 coding region. Analysis of clonable and unclonable sequences revealed that Sgs-1 mainly consists of 48-bp tandem repeats encoding a threonine-rich protein. The Sgs-1 inserts from single λ clones are heterogeneous in length, indicating that repeats are eliminated. By analyzing the expression of Sgs-1/lacZ fusions in transgenic flies, cis-regulatory elements of Sgs-1 were mapped to lie within 1 kb upstream of the transcriptional start site. Band shift assays revealed binding sites for the transcription factor fork head (FKH) and the factor secretion enhancer binding protein 3 (SEBP3) at positions that are functionally relevant. FKH and SEBP3 have been shown previously to be involved in the regulation of Sgs-3 and Sgs-4. Comparison of the levels of steady state RNA and of the transcription rates for Sgs-1 and Sgs-1/lacZ reporter genes indicates that Sgs-1 RNA is 100-fold more stable than Sgs-1/lacZ RNA. This has implications for the model of how Sgs transcripts accumulate in late third instar larvae.


Genetics ◽  
1973 ◽  
Vol 73 (3) ◽  
pp. 429-434
Author(s):  
J James Donady ◽  
R L Seecof ◽  
M A Fox

ABSTRACT Drosophila melanogaster embryos that lacked ribosomal DNA were obtained from appropriate crosses. Cells were taken from such embryos before overt differentiation took place and were cultured in vitro. These cells differentiated into neurons and myocytes with the same success as did wild-type controls. Therefore, ribosomal RNA synthesis is not necessary for the differentiation of neurons and myocytes in vitro.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document