In vitro activity of loracarbef against common respiratory pathogens compared with amoxicillin-clavulanic acid: a multi-centre study in The Netherlands

1995 ◽  
Vol 5 (3) ◽  
pp. 183-186
Author(s):  
Anthony J.A. van Griethuysen ◽  
Anhonius J.H.M. Janssen ◽  
Max van Noort ◽  
Henri A. Verbrugh ◽  
Rob J.A. Diepersloot
2002 ◽  
Vol 46 (12) ◽  
pp. 4019-4021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ingo Sobottka ◽  
Georg Cachovan ◽  
Enno Stürenburg ◽  
M. Oliver Ahlers ◽  
Rainer Laufs ◽  
...  

ABSTRACT We evaluated the antimicrobial susceptibility of 87 pathogens isolated from 37 patients with odontogenic abscesses. The most prevalent bacteria were viridans group streptococci and Prevotella species. Considering all bacterial isolates, 100% were susceptible to amoxicillin-clavulanic acid, 98% were susceptible to moxifloxacin and to levofloxacin, 76% were susceptible to doxycycline, 75% were susceptible to clindamycin, and 69% were susceptible to penicillin.


1996 ◽  
Vol 40 (5) ◽  
pp. 1248-1253 ◽  
Author(s):  
R Wise ◽  
J M Andrews ◽  
N Brenwald

GV104326 is a novel tricyclic beta-lactam (a trinem or, formerly, tribactam). The in vitro activity of GV104326 was compared with those of cefuroxime, cefixime, amoxicillin, amoxicillin-clavulanic acid, cefpirome, and ciprofloxacin. GV104326 had in vitro activity generally similar to that of cefixime against members of the family Enterobacteriaceae (MIC at which 90% of the isolates are inhibited [MIC90], < or = 2 micrograms/ml), with cefuroxime and amoxicillin-clavulanic acid being 8- to 32-fold less active and with cefpirome being 4- to 8-fold more active against members of this family. The trinem had no activity against Pseudomonas aeruginosa or Stenotrophomonas maltophilia (MIC90, > 128 micrograms/ml) but was the most active agent against Acinetobacter calcoaceticus. GV104326 was particularly active against gram-positive cocci. Ninety percent of methicillin-susceptible Staphylococcus aureus strains were susceptible to 0.03 microgram of GV104326 per ml, making it the most active agent studied. Enterococci and Lancefield group A and B streptococci were generally equally or somewhat more susceptible to GV104326 than they were to amoxicillin. Streptococcus pneumoniae strains were highly susceptible to GV104326, and those strains which showed decreased susceptibility to penicillin were generally twofold more susceptible to the trinem than to amoxicillin. Haemophilus influenzae and Moraxella catarrhalis were highly susceptible to GV104326 (MIC90s, 0.12 and 0.03 microgram/ml, respectively). The anaerobes Clostridium perfringens, Bacteroides fragilis, and Peptostreptococcus spp. were more susceptible to the trinems (formerly tribactams) than to the other agents studied.


2001 ◽  
Vol 45 (12) ◽  
pp. 3629-3630 ◽  
Author(s):  
Lucio Vera-Cabrera ◽  
Alejandra Gómez-Flores ◽  
Wendy G. Escalante-Fuentes ◽  
Oliverio Welsh

ABSTRACT The in vitro activity of a novel oxazolidinone, linezolid, was studied by comparing the activity of linezolid with those of amikacin, trimethoprim-sulfamethoxazole, and amoxicillin-clavulanic acid against 25 strains of Nocardia brasiliensis isolated from patients with mycetoma. All N. brasiliensis strains tested were sensitive to linezolid (MIC at which 90% of strains are inhibited [MIC90], 2 μg/ml; MIC50, 1 μg/ml). This antimicrobial might constitute a good alternative for treatment of actinomycetoma.


1998 ◽  
Vol 36 (11) ◽  
pp. 3415-3416 ◽  
Author(s):  
Anita Pandey ◽  
Arti Kapil ◽  
Seema Sood ◽  
Vikas Goel ◽  
Bimal Das ◽  
...  

In vitro susceptibility patterns of newer β-lactamase-inhibiting antibiotics ampicillin-sulbactam (A/S) and amoxicillin-clavulanic acid (A/C) for 100 consecutive isolates of Acinetobacter baumannii obtained from various clinical samples were studied. The A/C MIC for 86% of the strains was more than 16/8 μg/ml, whereas there was an A/S MIC of more than 16/8 μg/ml for only 38% of the strains. This showed that A/S has significantly superior in vitro activity compared to A/C against A. baumannii, although, theoretically, both should have similar activities. The therapeutic superiority of A/S over A/C needs to be studied, or else the breakpoints for these agents in in vitro tests need to be redefined.


2018 ◽  
Vol 5 (suppl_1) ◽  
pp. S418-S418 ◽  
Author(s):  
Susanne Paukner ◽  
Robert K Flamm ◽  
Steven P Gelone ◽  
Helio S Sader

Abstract Background LEF, a novel pleuromutilin antibiotic for IV and oral use, recently completed a phase 3 trial for the treatment of CABP in adults where it demonstrated noninferiority to moxifloxacin ± linezolid. LEF selectively inhibits bacterial translation. This study investigated the activity of LEF and comparators against contemporary bacterial respiratory pathogens collected from APAC and LA. Methods Unique isolates were collected from patients with pneumonia/respiratory (n = 551), blood stream (n = 169), skin and soft tissue (n = 244), and other (n = 55) infections in seven countries in APAC (n = 587) and four countries in LA (n = 432). LEF and comparators were tested by CLSI broth microdilution methods, and susceptibility was determined using CLSI (2018) breakpoints. Results In both APAC and LA, LEF showed potent in vitro activity against this collection of respiratory pathogens, with 100% of Streptococcus pneumoniae inhibited at ≤0.25 μg/mL. S. pneumoniae isolates were largely susceptible to moxifloxacin (98.2% APAC, 100.0% LA), amoxicillin/clavulanic acid (84.3% APAC, 89.4% LA), and ceftriaxone (85.2% APAC, 93.6% LA), but less susceptible to azithromycin (56.6% APAC, 68.1% LA) and penicillin (48.2% APAC, 67.0% LA). LEF was also active against Staphylococcus aureus with 99.6% of all isolates from both APAC and LA being inhibited at 0.25 µg/mL. 29.5% of methicillin-resistant S. aureus in APAC and 24.7% in LA showed particularly high resistance rates to erythromycin (59.3% APAC, 64.2% LA), moxifloxacin (49.4% APAC, 53.7% LA), and clindamycin (39.5% APAC, 59.7% LA). 98.2% and 97.9% of Haemophilus influenzae (in APAC and LA, respectively) were inhibited at LEF ≤2 μg/mL, and 100.0% of Moraxella catarrhalis were inhibited at LEF ≤0.12 μg/mL in both APAC and LA. Both organisms were largely susceptible to the comparators, except for ampicillin (49.1% and 74.5% susceptible among H. influenzae in APAC and LA, respectively) and trimethoprim/sulfamethoxazole (54.4% and 68.1% susceptible among H. influenzae) (figure). Conclusion In APAC and LA, LEF was highly active against pathogens collected from CABP patients in 2016, and its activity was not affected by resistance to other antibiotic classes. These data support the ongoing development of LEF for the treatment of CABP. Disclosures S. Paukner, Nabriva: Employee and Shareholder, Salary. R. K. Flamm, Nabriva Therapeutics: Research Contractor, Research support. S. P. Gelone, Nabriva Therapeutics: Employee, Equity, Shareholder and Salary. Achaogen: Shareholder, Equity, Shareholder. H. S. Sader, Nabriva Therapeutics: Research Contractor, Research support.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document