Imaging of bone sarcomas

2022 ◽  
pp. 665-685
Author(s):  
Himabindu Mikkilineni ◽  
Hakan Ilaslan ◽  
Murali Sundaram
Keyword(s):  
1999 ◽  
Vol 23 (5) ◽  
pp. 368-374 ◽  
Author(s):  
C. Ferrari ◽  
T. Bohling ◽  
M. S. Benassi ◽  
A. Ferraro ◽  
G. Gamberi ◽  
...  

2016 ◽  
Vol 8 (2) ◽  
pp. 111-121 ◽  
Author(s):  
Mikel San-Julian ◽  
Blanca Vazquez-Garcia

Cancers ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 13 (10) ◽  
pp. 2478
Author(s):  
George N. Tzanakakis ◽  
Eirini-Maria Giatagana ◽  
Aikaterini Berdiaki ◽  
Ioanna Spyridaki ◽  
Kyoko Hida ◽  
...  

Bone sarcomas, mesenchymal origin tumors, represent a substantial group of varying neoplasms of a distinct entity. Bone sarcoma patients show a limited response or do not respond to chemotherapy. Notably, developing efficient chemotherapy approaches, dealing with chemoresistance, and preventing metastasis pose unmet challenges in sarcoma therapy. Insulin-like growth factors 1 and 2 (IGF-1 and -2) and their respective receptors are a multifactorial system that significantly contributes to bone sarcoma pathogenesis. Whereas failures have been registered in creating novel targeted therapeutics aiming at the IGF pathway, new agent development should continue, evaluating combinatorial strategies for enhancing antitumor responses and better classifying the patients that could best benefit from these therapies. A plausible approach for developing a combinatorial strategy is to focus on the tumor microenvironment (TME) and processes executed therein. Herewith, we will discuss how the interplay between IGF-signaling and the TME constituents affects sarcomas’ basal functions and their response to therapy. This review highlights key studies focusing on IGF signaling in bone sarcomas, specifically studies underscoring novel properties that make this system an attractive therapeutic target and identifies new relationships that may be exploited. Potential direct and adjunct therapeutical implications of the extracellular matrix (ECM) effectors will also be summarized.


Cancer ◽  
1982 ◽  
Vol 49 (8) ◽  
pp. 1597-1604 ◽  
Author(s):  
Saim B. Balmukhanov ◽  
Ismahsam Turdugulov ◽  
Zaida Karibjanova ◽  
László Révész

Author(s):  
Jasminka Igrec ◽  
Michael H. Fuchsjäger

Background In the diagnosis of bone and soft-tissue sarcomas, the continuous advancement of various imaging modalities has improved the detection of small lesions, surgical planning, assessment of chemotherapeutic effects, and, importantly, guidance for surgery or biopsy. Method This review was composed based on a PubMed literature search for the terms “bone sarcoma,” “bone cancer” and “soft tissue sarcoma,” “imaging,” “magnetic resonance imaging”, “computed tomography”, “ultrasound”, “radiography”, and “radiomics” covering the publication period 2005–2020. Results and Conclusion As discussed in this review, radiography, ultrasound, CT, and MRI all play key roles in the imaging evaluation of bone and soft-tissue sarcomas. In daily practice, advanced MRI techniques complement standard MRI but remain underused, as they are considered time-consuming, technically challenging, and not reliable enough to replace biopsy and histology. PET/MRI and radiomics have shown promise regarding the imaging of sarcomas in the future. Key Points:  Citation Format


2021 ◽  
pp. 101664
Author(s):  
Matthew T. Houdek ◽  
Michael B. Stuart ◽  
Elizabeth P. Wellings ◽  
Eric R. Wagner ◽  
Dennis Asante ◽  
...  

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document