Imaging of Bone Sarcomas and Soft-Tissue Sarcomas

Author(s):  
Jasminka Igrec ◽  
Michael H. Fuchsjäger
Author(s):  
Jasminka Igrec ◽  
Michael H. Fuchsjäger

Background In the diagnosis of bone and soft-tissue sarcomas, the continuous advancement of various imaging modalities has improved the detection of small lesions, surgical planning, assessment of chemotherapeutic effects, and, importantly, guidance for surgery or biopsy. Method This review was composed based on a PubMed literature search for the terms “bone sarcoma,” “bone cancer” and “soft tissue sarcoma,” “imaging,” “magnetic resonance imaging”, “computed tomography”, “ultrasound”, “radiography”, and “radiomics” covering the publication period 2005–2020. Results and Conclusion As discussed in this review, radiography, ultrasound, CT, and MRI all play key roles in the imaging evaluation of bone and soft-tissue sarcomas. In daily practice, advanced MRI techniques complement standard MRI but remain underused, as they are considered time-consuming, technically challenging, and not reliable enough to replace biopsy and histology. PET/MRI and radiomics have shown promise regarding the imaging of sarcomas in the future. Key Points:  Citation Format


2011 ◽  
Author(s):  
Adam Lerner ◽  
Huihong Xu ◽  
Karen H Antman

Sarcomas originate from bone or soft tissue. The most common bone sarcomas are osteosarcomas, Ewing sarcomas, and chondrosarcomas. Soft tissue sarcomas develop in fibrous tissue, fat, muscle, blood vessels, and nerves. Historically, soft tissue sarcomas of the trunk and extremities were reported separately from those of visceral organs (e.g., gastrointestinal and gynecologic sarcomas). This chapter discusses the classification, epidemiology, diagnosis, staging, and treatment of sarcomas of bone and cartilage, and classic soft tissue sarcomas. Management of Kaposi sarcoma, gastrointestinal stromal tumors (GISTs), mesothelioma, and rhabdomyosarcoma is also described. Figures include images of patients with osteosarcoma, liposarcoma, uterine leiomyosarcoma, GIST, and osteosarcoma in a patient with Paget disease of bone. Tables list epidemiologic features of sarcomas, a summary of sarcomas by histology, familial syndromes associated with increased risk of sarcoma, survival rates in sarcoma patients, staging of soft tissue sarcomas, and results of a meta-analysis of doxorubicin-based adjuvant chemotherapy for localized resectable soft tissue sarcoma. This chapter contains 126 references.


Life ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 11 (9) ◽  
pp. 869
Author(s):  
Ruben I. Hack ◽  
Anton S. Becker ◽  
Beata Bode-Lesniewska ◽  
G. Ulrich Exner ◽  
Daniel A. Müller ◽  
...  

Introduction: The role of positron-emission tomography/computed-tomography (PET/CT) in the management of sarcomas and as a prognostic tool has been studied. However, it remains unclear which metric is the most useful. We aimed to investigate if volume-based PET metrics (Tumor volume (TV) and total lesions glycolysis (TLG)) are superior to maximal standardized uptake value (SUVmax) and other metrics in predicting survival of patients with soft tissue and bone sarcomas. Materials and Methods: In this retrospective cohort study, we screened over 52′000 PET/CT scans to identify patients diagnosed with either soft tissue, bone or Ewing sarcoma and had a staging scan at our institution before initial therapy. We used a Wilcoxon signed-rank to assess which PET/CT metric was associated with survival in different patient subgroups. Receiver-Operating-Characteristic curve analysis was used to calculate cutoff values. Results: We identified a total of 88 patients with soft tissue (51), bone (26) or Ewing (11) sarcoma. Median age at presentation was 40 years (Range: 9–86 years). High SUVmax was most significantly associated with short survival (defined as <24 months) in soft tissue sarcoma (with a median and range of SUVmax 12.5 (8.8–16.0) in short (n = 18) and 5.5 (3.3–7.2) in long survival (≥24 months) (n = 31), with (p = 0.001). Similar results were seen in Ewing sarcoma (with a median and range of SUVmax 12.1 (7.6–14.7) in short (n = 6) and 3.7 (3.5–5.5) in long survival (n = 5), with (p = 0.017). However, no PET-specific metric but tumor-volume was significantly associated (p = 0.035) with survival in primary bone sarcomas (with a median and range of 217 cm3 (186–349) in short survival (n = 4) and 60 cm3 (22–104) in long survival (n = 19), with (p = 0.035). TLG was significantly inversely associated with long survival only in Ewing sarcoma (p = 0.03). Discussion: Our analysis shows that the outcome of soft tissue, bone and Ewing sarcomas is associated with different PET/CT metrics. We could not confirm the previously suggested superiority of volume-based metrics in soft tissue sarcomas, for which we found SUVmax to remain the best prognostic factor. However, bone sarcomas should probably be evaluated with tumor volume rather than FDG PET activity.


2006 ◽  
Vol 24 (18_suppl) ◽  
pp. 9551-9551
Author(s):  
A. Comandone ◽  
C. Oliva ◽  
A. Boglione ◽  
F. Garetto ◽  
P. Bergnolo ◽  
...  

9551 Background: Sarcoma are rare tumors, with an incidence <1% of all neoplasms. Very few data are available on the clinical and psychological needs of the pts in terminal phase of these diseases. In terminal phase the goal is no more cure or prolongation of life, but the control of symptoms related to the disease progression. Methods: As a specialized interdisciplinary group we have started to treat the pts afflicted from soft tissue and bone sarcomas since 1994. We have recorded in a perspective study the problems of the terminal pts from 1998 until 2005. We have followed 178 pts with sarcomas in terminal phase for at least 3 months: 95 males and 83 females, median age 57 years, median PS 50 Karnofsky. Histologically 143 had soft tissue sarcomas, 28 osteosarcomas, 7 Ewing sarcomas. Extremities were the origin of the disease in 33.7% of the cases, abdomen in 29.2%, trunk in 21.9% and other sites in 15.2%. Site of recorded metastases: lung 48.3%, liver 18.5%, bone 15.7%, brain 7.9%, nodes 4.5%. Inoperable primary tumors or local relapse 30.9%. Results: During the last part (1 months) of their lives the pts complained with: pain 78.7%, dyspnoea 48.9%, anxiety 16.9%, gastrointestinal obstruction 24.7%, anorexia 51.1%, bleeding 7.9%. 57.3% of these pts died at home, 42.7% at the hospital. To control pain, dyspnoea and the other symptoms radiotherapy (43%), supportive care (100%) and palliative chemotherapy (36%) were used. Psycological support was offered to the majority of pts (63.5%) as well as physical rehabilitation (56.8%). Conclusions: Supportive care of pts with advanced sarcomas is an underestimated aspect in clinical oncology. We have demonstrated that these pts have specific needs, on some aspects, different from those of the pts afflicted from the most common cancers. A complex, multidisciplinary approach is necessary in order to improve the assistance and quality of life of these pts. No significant financial relationships to disclose.


2011 ◽  
Author(s):  
Adam Lerner ◽  
Huihong Xu ◽  
Karen H Antman

Sarcomas originate from bone or soft tissue. The most common bone sarcomas are osteosarcomas, Ewing sarcomas, and chondrosarcomas. Soft tissue sarcomas develop in fibrous tissue, fat, muscle, blood vessels, and nerves. Historically, soft tissue sarcomas of the trunk and extremities were reported separately from those of visceral organs (e.g., gastrointestinal and gynecologic sarcomas). This chapter discusses the classification, epidemiology, diagnosis, staging, and treatment of sarcomas of bone and cartilage, and classic soft tissue sarcomas. Management of Kaposi sarcoma, gastrointestinal stromal tumors (GISTs), mesothelioma, and rhabdomyosarcoma is also described. Figures include images of patients with osteosarcoma, liposarcoma, uterine leiomyosarcoma, GIST, and osteosarcoma in a patient with Paget disease of bone. Tables list epidemiologic features of sarcomas, a summary of sarcomas by histology, familial syndromes associated with increased risk of sarcoma, survival rates in sarcoma patients, staging of soft tissue sarcomas, and results of a meta-analysis of doxorubicin-based adjuvant chemotherapy for localized resectable soft tissue sarcoma. This chapter contains 126 references.


2018 ◽  
Vol 21 ◽  
pp. 386-397 ◽  
Author(s):  
Zhuo Ma ◽  
Lifang Guo ◽  
Xiangli Cui ◽  
He Liu ◽  
Lihong Liu

Objectives: Endostar (recombinant human endostatin (rh-endostatin)), a 20-kDa proteolytic fragment of collagen XVIII, was approved for the treatment of non–small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). Recently, several studies have evaluated the efficacy of rh-endostatin combined with chemotherapy in the treatment of bone and soft tissue sarcomas. Here, we conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis to assess available evidence. Methods: Pubmed, Embase, Web of Sciences, the Cochrane Library and two Chinese literature databases (CNKI, WanFang) were systematically searched till May 20, 2018. Randomized controlled trials (RCTs) and cohort studies which compared the outcomes of rh-endostatin combined with chemotherapy versus chemotherapy alone for treating bone sarcomas or soft tissue sarcomas were included. The primary outcome was overall survival rate (OSR). Secondary outcomes included objectiveremissionrate(ORR), clinical benefit rate (CBR), disease control rate (DCR), distant metastasis rate (DMR) and adverse effects (AEs). The methodological quality of the included studies was evaluated. Data analysis was performed by Revman 5.3 software. Results: 9 studies comprising 839 patients were included. The pooled results indicated that, compared with chemotherapeutic agents alone, rh-endostatin combined group had a significant benefit in 1-year and 2-year OSR. However, there were no difference between 5-year OSR. OR, CBR and DMR were higher in rh-endostatin combined group. No significant difference was observed in the incidence of AEs. Conclusions: Rh-endostatin combined chemotherapeutic agents significantly improved clinical efficacy compared with chemotherapeutic agents alone in treating bone and soft tissue sarcomas. Moreover, combination of rh-endostatin with chemotherapy didn’t increase the incidence of AEs. But more high quality RCTs with  large  sample  size  should  be  done  in  the  future  to confirm the conclusion.


Bone sarcomas 296 Soft tissue sarcomas 300 Surgical treatments 302 Metastatic bone disease (MBD) 306 Bone sarcomas are extremely rare, with less than 550 new cases per annum in the UK. They account for only 0.2% of all new cancers, but 5% of childhood cancers. The main types of bone sarcoma/tumour are:...


2010 ◽  
Vol 28 (15_suppl) ◽  
pp. e20000-e20000
Author(s):  
R. Rivera-Luna ◽  
Rocio Cardenas-Cardos ◽  
Liliana Velasco-Hidalgo ◽  
Armando Martinez-Avalos ◽  
Araceli Castellanos-Toledo

1980 ◽  
Vol 66 (6) ◽  
pp. 721-728 ◽  
Author(s):  
Kaj Tallroth ◽  
Francisco Makai ◽  
Renato Musumeci

The case material was collected from 3 Institutions with a total of 411 patients: 217 with primary bone tumor and 224 with soft tissue sarcomas. In the majority of patients lymphography was performed during the initial diagnostic workup. The lymphograms were interpreted as negative or positive for metastases. In bone tumors, the incidence of metastases was 21 %, ranging from 28 % for osteosarcoma to 18 % for Ewing's sarcoma and 13 % for chondrosarcoma. In tumors of the soft tissue, the frequency was somewhat higher (28%), with special regard to rhabdomyosarcoma (53%), anaplastic sarcoma (67 %), neurogenic sarcoma (42%) and synovial sarcoma (35%). In the group of bone sarcomas, primary hematogenous spread was 3 times more frequent than lymphogenous spread, while in soft tissue sarcomas, with a higher incidence of lymphatic spread, this finding was inverted. In the more consistent tumor groups, the occurrence of lymphatic metastases indicated a significant worsening of the prognosis. In 96 patients, lymph node biopsies were performed and the radiologic histologic correlation gave evidence of a 91.7 % overall diagnostic accuracy.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document