scholarly journals Implications of Perioperative Morbidity for Long-Term Outcomes

Author(s):  
Kristen C. Rock ◽  
Mark F. Newman ◽  
Lee A. Fleisher
2015 ◽  
Vol 81 (9) ◽  
pp. 909-914 ◽  
Author(s):  
Prashant B. Sukharamwala ◽  
Krishen D. Patel ◽  
Anthony F. Teta ◽  
Shailraj Parikh ◽  
Sharona B. Ross ◽  
...  

Pylorus-preserving pancreaticoduodenectomy (PPPD) and duodenum-preserving pancreatic head resection (DPPHR) are important treatment options for patients with chronic pancreatitis. This meta-analysis was undertaken to compare the long-term outcomes of DPPHR versus PPPD in patients with chronic pancreatitis. A systematic literature search was conducted using Embase, MEDLINE, Cochrane, and PubMed databases on all studies published between January 1991 and January 2013 reporting intermediate and long-term outcomes after DPPHR and PPPD for chronic pancreatitis. Long-term outcomes of interest were complete pain relief, quality of life, professional rehabilitation, exocrine insufficiency, and endocrine insufficiency. Other outcomes of interest included perioperative morbidity and length of stay (LOS). Ten studies were included comprising of 569 patients. There was no significant difference in complete pain relief ( P = 0.24), endocrine insufficiency ( P = 0.15), and perioperative morbidity ( P = 0.13) between DPPHR and PPPD. However, quality of life ( P < 0.00001), professional rehabilitation ( P = 0.004), exocrine insufficiency ( P = 0.005), and LOS ( P = 0.00001) were significantly better for patients undergoing DPPHR compared with PPPD. In conclusion, there is no significant difference in endocrine insufficiency, postoperative pain relief, and perioperative morbidity for patients undergoing DPPHR versus PPPD. Improved intermediate and long-term outcomes including LOS, quality of life, professional rehabilitation, and preservation of exocrine function make DPPHR a more favorable approach than PPPD for patients with chronic pancreatitis.


HPB ◽  
2019 ◽  
Vol 21 ◽  
pp. S321
Author(s):  
Saiesh Reddy Voppuru ◽  
Rajesh Shinde ◽  
Manish Bhandare ◽  
Vikram Chaudhari ◽  
Shailesh Shrikhande

Author(s):  
Oscar D. Guillamondegui

Traumatic brain injury (TBI) is a serious epidemic in the United States. It affects patients of all ages, race, and socioeconomic status (SES). The current care of these patients typically manifests after sequelae have been identified after discharge from the hospital, long after the inciting event. The purpose of this article is to introduce the concept of identification and management of the TBI patient from the moment of injury through long-term care as a multidisciplinary approach. By promoting an awareness of the issues that develop around the acutely injured brain and linking them to long-term outcomes, the trauma team can initiate care early to alter the effect on the patient, family, and community. Hopefully, by describing the care afforded at a trauma center and by a multidisciplinary team, we can bring a better understanding to the armamentarium of methods utilized to treat the difficult population of TBI patients.


2007 ◽  
Vol 177 (4S) ◽  
pp. 441-441
Author(s):  
Muhammad Z. Aslam ◽  
Meena Agarwal ◽  
Timothy P. Stephenson
Keyword(s):  

2007 ◽  
Vol 177 (4S) ◽  
pp. 331-331 ◽  
Author(s):  
Stephen D.W. Beck ◽  
Richard S. Foster ◽  
Richard Bihrle ◽  
John P. Donohue

2006 ◽  
Vol 175 (4S) ◽  
pp. 8-9 ◽  
Author(s):  
Brent K. Hollenbeck ◽  
Yongliang Wei ◽  
John D. Birkmeyer

2017 ◽  
Vol 23 ◽  
pp. 50
Author(s):  
Jothydev Kesavadev ◽  
Shashank Joshi ◽  
Banshi Saboo ◽  
Hemant Thacker ◽  
Arun Shankar ◽  
...  

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document