Non-destructive Bond Strength Testing of Anodic Bonded Wafers

2010 ◽  
pp. 551-554
Author(s):  
Roy Knechtel
Keyword(s):  
Bond Strength ◽  
Strength Testing ◽  
Non Destructive

Navigating The Dentin Bond Strength Testing Highway: Lessons And Recommendations

2010 ◽  
pp. 245-260 ◽  
Author(s):  
J. L. Ferracane ◽  
M. R. P. Macedo ◽  
J. M. Dossett ◽  
T. J. Hilton ◽  
F. Pelogia
Keyword(s):  
Bond Strength ◽  
Strength Testing

scholarly journals Effect of Surface Treatment and Storage Time on Immediate Repair Bond Strength Durability of Methacrylate- and Ormocer-Based Bulk Fill Resin Composites

2020 ◽  
Vol 10 (22) ◽  
pp. 8308
Author(s):  
Farid S. El-Askary ◽  
Sara A. Botros ◽  
Mutlu Özcan
Keyword(s):  
Bond Strength ◽  
Surface Treatment ◽  
Shear Bond Strength ◽  
Storage Time ◽  
Strength Testing ◽  
Repair System ◽  
Resin Composites ◽  
Oxygen Inhibition ◽  
And Storage ◽  
Effect Of Surface

The aim of this study was to evaluate the effect of surface treatment and storage time on immediate repair bond durability of methacrylate- and ormocer-based bulk fill composites. In total, 265 discs were divided into 32 groups (n = 8/group) according to: (1) Material: X-tra fil and Admira Fusion X-tra; (2) Surface treatment: oxygen inhibition; matrix; Futurabond M+; Silane/Futurabond M+; Admira Bond; Silane/Admira Bond; ceramic repair system; and Silane/Cimara bond; and (3) Storage time: 24 h and 6 months. Each disc received three micro-cylinders from the same material. Specimens were subjected to micro-shear bond strength testing either at 24 h or 6 months. Data were analyzed using ANOVA/Tukey’s test/Student t-test (p = 0.05). All experimental factors had significant effect on bond strength (p < 0.0001). Drop in bond strength was noticed in both materials after six months (p < 0.05), except for Admira Fusion X-tra treated with silane/cimara adhesive (p = 0.860). Both materials showed insignificant values with Admira bond either at 24 h or 6 months (p = 0.275 and p = 0.060, respectively). For other treatments, X-tra fil showed significantly higher values at 24 h and 6 months (p < 0.05). Ceramic repair system can be used to immediately repair both methacrylate- and ormocer-based composites.

An optimized synthetic substrate for orthodontic bond strength testing

2003 ◽  
Vol 19 (8) ◽  
pp. 773-778 ◽  
Author(s):  
A Klocke ◽  
D Tadic ◽  
B Kahl-Nieke ◽  
M Epple
Keyword(s):  
Bond Strength ◽  
Strength Testing ◽  
Synthetic Substrate

Relationship between non-destructive leakage evaluation and bond strength of adhesives

2014 ◽  
Vol 30 ◽  
pp. e149
Author(s):  
P. Makishi ◽  
S. Thitthaweerat ◽  
A. Sadr ◽  
Y. Shimada ◽  
M. Giannini ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Bond Strength ◽  
Non Destructive

scholarly journals Meta-analytical Review of Parameters Involved in Dentin Bonding

2011 ◽  
Vol 91 (4) ◽  
pp. 351-357 ◽  
Author(s):  
J. De Munck ◽  
A. Mine ◽  
A. Poitevin ◽  
A. Van Ende ◽  
M.Vivan Cardoso ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Bond Strength ◽  
Water Storage ◽  
High Sensitivity ◽  
Strength Testing ◽  
Discriminative Power ◽  
Strength Data ◽  
Weighted Means ◽  
Strength Tests ◽  
Analytical Review

Bond-strength testing is the method most used for the assessment of bonding effectiveness to enamel and dentin. We aimed to disclose general trends in adhesive performance by collecting dentin bond-strength data systematically. The PubMed and EMBASE databases were used to identify 2,157 bond-strength tests in 298 papers. Most used was the micro-tensile test, which appeared to have a larger discriminative power than the traditional macro-shear test. Because of the huge variability in dentin bond-strength data and the high number of co-variables, a neural network statistical model was constructed. Variables like ‘research group’ and ‘adhesive brand’ appeared most determining. Weighted means derived from this analysis confirmed the high sensitivity of current adhesive approaches (especially of all-in-one adhesives) to long-term water-storage and substrate variability.

Comparison of dynamic versus static bond strength testing

2010 ◽  
Vol 26 (2) ◽  
pp. e144 ◽  
Author(s):  
A. Poitevin ◽  
J. De Munck ◽  
M.V. Cardoso ◽  
A. Mine ◽  
M. Peumans ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Bond Strength ◽  
Strength Testing

scholarly journals Effect of etching time and light source on the bond strength of metallic brackets to ceramic

2011 ◽  
Vol 22 (3) ◽  
pp. 245-248 ◽  
Author(s):  
Paulo Roberto Amaral Gonçalves ◽  
Rafael Ratto de Moraes ◽  
Ana Rosa Costa ◽  
Américo Bortolazzo Correr ◽  
Paulo Roberto Aranha Nouer ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Bond Strength ◽  
Light Source ◽  
Argon Laser ◽  
Etching Time ◽  
Strength Testing ◽  
Light Sources ◽  
Ceramic Surface ◽  
Light Activation ◽  
Adhesive Remnant Index ◽  
Halogen Light

This study evaluated the bond strength of brackets to ceramic testing different etching times and light sources for photo-activation of the bonding agent. Cylinders of feldspathic ceramic were etched with 10% hydrofluoric acid for 20 or 60 s. After application of silane on the ceramic surface, metallic brackets were bonded to the cylinders using Transbond XT (3M Unitek). The specimens for each etching time were assigned to 4 groups (n=15), according to the light source: XL2500 halogen light, UltraLume 5 LED, AccuCure 3000 argon laser, and Apollo 95E plasma arc. Light-activation was carried out with total exposure times of 40, 40, 20 and 12 s, respectively. Shear strength testing was carried out after 24 h. The adhesive remnant index (ARI) was evaluated under magnification. Data were subjected to two-way ANOVA and Tukey's test (α=0.05). Specimens etched for 20 s presented significantly lower bond strength (p<0.05) compared with those etched for 60 s. No significant differences (p>0.05) were detected among the light sources. The ARI showed a predominance of scores 0 in all groups, with an increase in scores 1, 2 and 3 for the 60 s time. In conclusion, only the etching time had significant influence on the bond strength of brackets to ceramic.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document