ACC Medical Directors' Institute, October 5—7, 2005

2005 ◽  
Vol 14 (12) ◽  
pp. 10-14 ◽  
Keyword(s):  
1998 ◽  
Vol 14 (4) ◽  
pp. 346-356 ◽  
Author(s):  
Leiyu Shi ◽  
Michael E. Samuels ◽  
Christopher R. Cochran ◽  
Saundra Glover ◽  
Douglas A. Singh

Author(s):  
Matthew W Parker ◽  
Diana Sobieraj ◽  
Mary Beth Farrell ◽  
Craig I Coleman

Background: Little has been published on the practice of echocardiography (echo) in the United States. We used the Intersocietal Accreditation Commission-Echocardiography (IAC-Echo) applications database to describe the personnel in echo laboratories seeking accreditation. Methods: We used de-identified data provided on IAC-Echo applications to characterize facilities by hospital association, census region, annual volume, number of sites, previous accreditation, and numbers of physicians and sonographers as well as National Board of Echocardiography (NBE) testamur status of physicians and registered credential status of sonographers. We categorized Medical Directors by board certification in cardiovascular diseases, internal medicine, other specialty, or none. Medical Director echo training could be formal Level 2 or 3 or experiential by ≥3 years of practice. Frequencies, means, and medians were compared between groups using the chi-square test, t-test, or Mann Whitney test, respectively. Results: From 2011 to 2013, 1926 echo labs representing 10618 physicians and 6870 sonographers applied for IAC-Echo accreditation or re-accreditation. The majority of medical directors were board certified in cardiovascular diseases and 34.1% of medical directors and 27.2% of staff physicians held NBE testamur status; 79.5% of sonographers held registered credentials. Most echo labs were in the Northeast or South census regions, have an average of 1.75 sites, and are based outside of hospitals (Table). Compared to nonhospital echo labs, medical directors of hospital-based echo labs were more likely to be Level 3 trained (19.8% versus 30.8%, p<0.01) and be NBE testamurs (28.9% versus 45.6%, p<0.01). Markers of echo lab size, region, previous accreditation, and credentialed sonographers were associated with accreditation versus delay decisions; there was a trend toward accreditation among facilities with NBE medical directors. Conclusion: Among facilities seeking IAC-Echo accreditation, the minority of echo physicians hold NBE testamur status. Hospital and nonhospital facilities are different in the credentials of their personnel.


2020 ◽  
Vol 35 (Supplement_3) ◽  
Author(s):  
Suguru Yamamoto ◽  
Brian Bieber ◽  
Hirotaka Komaba ◽  
Hiroki Kitabayashi ◽  
Takanobu Nomura ◽  
...  

Abstract Background and Aims Patients undergoing dialysis for end-stage kidney disease (ESKD) have poorer nutritional status than the general population, and worse nutritional status is associated with poor clinical outcomes. Hyperphosphatemia is common in dialysis patients owing to abnormal mineral and bone metabolism. Nephrologists manage hyperphosphatemia by prescribing phosphate binders and/or recommending restriction of dietary protein intake; the latter may, however, adversely affect nutritional status. In this analysis, we address the hypothesis that, even in the presence of hyperphosphatemia, liberalizing dietary protein leads to better patient outcomes. Method The analysis includes 11,628 hemodialysis (HD) patients in 12 countries in DOPPS phase 4 (2009-2011), from 254 facilities where the medical director completed a survey reporting facility practices. Demographic data, comorbid conditions, laboratory values, and medications were abstracted from patient records. Mortality was assessed during study follow-up. The primary exposure variable was response to the following question: “For patients with serum albumin 3.0 g/dL and phosphate 6.0 mg/dL, do you typically recommend to (A) increase or (B) not change or decrease dietary protein intake?” The primary outcome was all-cause mortality, analyzed by Cox regression, stratified by country, accounting for facility clustering using robust sandwich covariance estimators, and adjusted for case-mix and laboratory values. Linear regression was used to model the associations between the exposure variable and intermediate nutritional markers including serum albumin, creatinine, and phosphorus. We used multiple imputation to replace missing values for model covariates. Results Median follow-up was 1.4 years. In the case scenario, 91% of medical directors in North America recommended to increase protein intake compared to 58% in Europe (range=36-83% across 7 countries) and 56% in Japan (Figure). Advice to increase dietary protein intake was associated with 0.33 mg/dL higher serum creatinine levels (95% CI: 0.08-0.57) after adjustment for case mix, while clinically meaningful associations were not observed for serum albumin and phosphorus. Advice to increase dietary protein intake was weakly associated with lower mortality [HR (95% CI): 0.89 (0.77-1.03)]. The association with survival was stronger in patients with age 70+ years [HR (95% CI): 0.81(0.68-0.96), P=0.08 for interaction] and for those without diabetes [HR (95% CI): 0.81(0.66-0.98), P=0.20 for interaction] Conclusion In this large international cohort study, the medical director’s stated preference to recommend an increase in dietary protein intake for HD patients with low albumin and high phosphorus levels was most common in North America and was associated with higher patient serum creatinine levels and potentially lower all-cause mortality. Additional research into the possible benefits of protein intake liberalization for HD patients, even in the presence of hyperphosphatemia, is warranted. This abstract was directly supported by Kyowa Kirin Co.,Ltd..


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document