scholarly journals Fabrication of smart parts using powder bed fusion additive manufacturing technology

2016 ◽  
Vol 10 ◽  
pp. 58-66 ◽  
Author(s):  
Mohammad Shojib Hossain ◽  
Jose A. Gonzalez ◽  
Ricardo Martinez Hernandez ◽  
Mohammad Arif Ishtiaque Shuvo ◽  
Jorge Mireles ◽  
...  
2021 ◽  
Vol 13 (7) ◽  
pp. 168781402110344
Author(s):  
Huangyu Gao ◽  
Hongjun Li

Additive manufacturing as a major component of the “fourth Industrial Revolution” is getting more and more attention. Friction additive manufacturing technology (FAM) is a subdivision of additive manufacturing technology. Because of its solid-state characteristics, deposition by FAM shows better mechanical performance than other technologies such as powder bed fusion technologies. This paper presents a state-of-the-art survey on the development of FAM in three categories: (i) Friction stir additive manufacturing; (ii) Friction surfacing additive manufacturing; (iii) Metal powder assisted additive manufacturing. The underlying principles, process parameters, microstructure, mechanical properties, and existing problems are described and discussed in detail.


2015 ◽  
Vol 137 (08) ◽  
pp. 30-35 ◽  
Author(s):  
Timothy W. Simpson

This article discusses how mechanical engineers can help in filling the gaps in additive manufacturing technology. Traditionally, mechanical engineers have designed parts by selecting a material with the best known properties and then creating the shape they want. With additive manufacturing, the process is reversed. The shape is first printed, and then other processes are completed later. Every step of the process has numerous unknowns right now, and the tools, methods, and fundamental understanding needed to answer these questions do not exist. Modeling laser-powder interactions is difficult, especially since the physics and heat transfer phenomena are not fully understood in additive manufacturing systems, particularly powder-bed fusion systems. The models and simulations that have been created are computationally expensive and still undergoing validation and verification. Models are also needed to predict the residual stresses that will result and distortions that will occur. In short, mechanical engineers have a lot of work to do to help additive manufacturing reach its full potential.


2021 ◽  
Vol 194 ◽  
pp. 110415
Author(s):  
Vera E. Küng ◽  
Robert Scherr ◽  
Matthias Markl ◽  
Carolin Körner

2021 ◽  
Vol 1 ◽  
pp. 1657-1666
Author(s):  
Joaquin Montero ◽  
Sebastian Weber ◽  
Christoph Petroll ◽  
Stefan Brenner ◽  
Matthias Bleckmann ◽  
...  

AbstractCommercially available metal Laser Powder Bed Fusion (L-PBF) systems are steadily evolving. Thus, design limitations narrow and the diversity of achievable geometries widens. This progress leads researchers to create innovative benchmarks to understand the new system capabilities. Thereby, designers can update their knowledge base in design for additive manufacturing (DfAM). To date, there are plenty of geometrical benchmarks that seek to develop generic test artefacts. Still, they are often complex to measure, and the information they deliver may not be relevant to some designers. This article proposes a geometrical benchmarking approach for metal L-PBF systems based on the designer needs. Furthermore, Geometric Dimensioning and Tolerancing (GD&T) characteristics enhance the approach. A practical use-case is presented, consisting of developing, manufacturing, and measuring a meaningful and straightforward geometric test artefact. Moreover, optical measuring systems are used to create a tailored uncertainty map for benchmarking two different L-PBF systems.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document