Energy and CO2 exchange in an undisturbed spruce forest and clear-cut in the Southern Taiga

2019 ◽  
Vol 265 ◽  
pp. 252-268 ◽  
Author(s):  
Vadim Mamkin ◽  
Julia Kurbatova ◽  
Vitaly Avilov ◽  
Dmitry Ivanov ◽  
Olga Kuricheva ◽  
...  
Forests ◽  
2020 ◽  
Vol 11 (2) ◽  
pp. 126 ◽  
Author(s):  
Sille Rebane ◽  
Kalev Jõgiste ◽  
Andres Kiviste ◽  
John A. Stanturf ◽  
Marek Metslaid

A large area of Estonian hemiboreal forest is recovering from clear-cut harvesting and changing carbon (C) balance of the stands. However, there is a lack of information about C- source/sink relationships during recovery of such stands. The eddy covariance technique was used to estimate C-status through net ecosystem exchange (NEE) of CO2 in two stands of different development stages located in southeast Estonia in 2014. Measured summertime (June–September) mean CO2 concentration was 337.75 ppm with mean NEE −1.72 µmol m−2 s−1. June NEE was −4.60 µmol m−2 s−1; July, August, and September NEE was −1.17, −0.77, and −0.25 µmol m−2 s−1, respectively. The two stands had similar patterns of CO2 exchange; measurement period temperature drove NEE. Our results show that after clear-cutting a 6-year-old forest ecosystem was a light C-sink and 8-year-old young stand demonstrated a stronger C-sink status during the measurement period.


2014 ◽  
Vol 11 (2) ◽  
pp. 2189-2226 ◽  
Author(s):  
J. Hommeltenberg ◽  
H. P. Schmid ◽  
M. Droesler ◽  
P. Werle

Abstract. This study compares the CO2 exchange of a natural bog forest, and of a bog drained for forestry in the pre-alpine region of southern Germany. The sites are separated by only ten kilometers, they share the same formation history and are exposed to the same climate and weather conditions. In contrast, they differ in land use history: at the Schechenfilz site a natural bog-pine forest (Pinus mugo rotundata) grows on an undisturbed, about 5 m thick peat layer; at Mooseurach a planted spruce forest (Picea abies) grows on drained and degraded peat (3.4 m). The net ecosystem exchange of CO2 (NEE) at both sites has been investigated for two years (July 2010 to June 2012), using the eddy covariance technique. Our results indicate that the drained, forested bog at Mooseurach is a much stronger carbon dioxide sink (−130 ± 31 and −300 ± 66 g C m−2 a−1 in the first and second year respectively) than the natural bog forest at Schechenfilz (−53 ± 28 and −73±38 g C m−2 a−1). The strong net CO2 uptake can be explained by the high gross primary productivity of the spruces that over-compensates the two times stronger ecosystem respiration at the drained site. The larger productivity of the spruces can be clearly attributed to the larger LAI of the spruce site. However, even though current flux measurements indicate strong CO2 uptake of the drained spruce forest, the site is a strong net CO2 source, if the whole life-cycle, since forest planting is considered. We determined the difference between carbon fixation by the spruces and the carbon loss from the peat due to drainage since forest planting. The estimate resulted in a strong carbon release of +156 t C ha−1 within the last 44 yr, means the spruces would need to grow for another 100 yr, at the current rate, to compensate the peat loss of the former years. In contrast, the natural bog-pine ecosystem has likely been a small but consistent carbon sink for decades, which our results suggest is very robust regarding short-term changes of environmental factors.


2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Pavel Alekseychik ◽  
Aino Korrensalo ◽  
Ivan Mammarella ◽  
Samuli Launiainen ◽  
Eeva-Stiina Tuittila ◽  
...  

Abstract. Pristine boreal mires are known as substantial sinks of carbon dioxide (CO2) and net emitters of methane (CH4). Natural bogs constitute a major fraction of boreal mires. However, the bog CO2 and CH4 balances are poorly known, having been largely estimated based on discrete and short term measurements by manual chambers, and seldom using the eddy-covariance (EC) technique. Eddy-covariance (EC) measurements of CO2 and CH4 exchange were conducted in the Siikaneva mire complex in southern Finland in 2011–2016. The site is a patterned bog having a moss/sedge/shrub vegetation typical of Eurasian southern Taiga, with several ponds near the EC tower. The study presents a complete series of CO2 and CH4 EC flux measurements and identifies the environmental factors controlling the ecosystem-atmosphere CO2 and CH4 exchange. A 6-year average growing season (May–September) cumulative CO2 exchange of −60 g C m−2 was observed, which partitions into mean total respiration (Re) of 167 (146–197 annually) g C m−2 and mean gross primary production (GPP) of 228 (193–257 annually) g C m−2, while the corresponding CH4 emission amounts to 7.1 (6.4...8.4) g C m−2. The contribution of October–December CO2 and CH4 fluxes to the cumulative sums was not negligible based on the measurements during one winter. GPP, Re and CH4 fluxes increased with temperature, and did not show a strong decline even after a substantial water table drawdown in 2011. Instead, GPP, Re and FCH4 became suppressed in cool, cloudy and wet conditions of 2012. May–September cumulative net ecosystem exchange (NEE) of 2013–2016 remained at about −73 g C m−2, in contrast to the hot and dry year 2011 and the wet and cool year 2012, when suboptimal weather likely degraded the net sink by 20 and 40 g C m−2, correspondingly. The cumulative growing season sums of GPP and CH4 emission showed a strong positive relationship. The EC source area was found to be comprised of 8 distinct surface types. However, footprint analyses revealed that contributions of different surface types varied only within 10–20 % with respect to wind direction and stability conditions. Consequently, no clear link between CO2 and CH4 fluxes and footprint composition was found, despite the apparent variation of fluxes with wind direction.


Biologia ◽  
2013 ◽  
Vol 68 (5) ◽  
Author(s):  
Jana Lóšková ◽  
Peter Ľuptáčik ◽  
Dana Miklisová ◽  
Ľubomír Kováč

AbstractIn November 2004 a catastrophic windstorm destroyed a large part of the spruce forest in the Tatra National Park (Slovakia). The majority of the windthrown area was cleared; only a small part was left uncleared, thereby allowing regeneration by natural succession. The aim of the present study was to assess the impact of the different forestry practices on soil Oribatida. Three different stands were selected for the study, where sampling took place in June and October 2006: control forest stands (REF), windthrown stands left for natural development (NEX) and clear-cut windthrown stands (EXT). The mean abundance of Oribatida recorded in REF and NEX stands was significantly higher than in EXT stands. Kruskal-Wallis test of mean abundance of adults as well as juveniles confirmed significant influence of treatment and date. The highest abundance of adults was found in control forest stands (REF). Post hoc multiple comparison proved significantly lower abundance of adults in clear-cut stands (EXT) compared with REF. The mean abundance of adults and juveniles was several times higher in stands left for natural development (NEX) than in EXT stands. The highest species richness was observed in REF, followed by NEX and EXT stands. Ordination method showed differences in species composition between studied treatments. Furthermore, a much lower abundance of Hermannia gibba, a dweller of leaf litter and upper soil layers, was recorded in cleared stands compared to the other stands. Indeed, windthrown stands had an obvious lower species richness than control stands. The ordination method used demonstrated a significant influence of both treatment and sampling date on the abundance and species richness of Oribatida. The present study showed that clear-cutting of wind-damaged spruce forest markedly decreases the abundance of soil Oribatida compared with windthrown forest stands left to natural succession.


2019 ◽  
Vol 12 (5) ◽  
pp. 491-501 ◽  
Author(s):  
V. V. Mamkin ◽  
V. K. Avilov ◽  
D. G. Ivanov ◽  
A. V. Olchev ◽  
J. A. Kurbatova

2016 ◽  
Vol 19 (3) ◽  
pp. 462-473 ◽  
Author(s):  
Karen A. Harper ◽  
Pierre Drapeau ◽  
Daniel Lesieur ◽  
Yves Bergeron

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document