Quantifying the impacts of pre-occurred ENSO signals on wheat yield variation using machine learning in Australia

2020 ◽  
Vol 291 ◽  
pp. 108043 ◽  
Author(s):  
Bin Wang ◽  
Puyu Feng ◽  
Cathy Waters ◽  
James Cleverly ◽  
De Li Liu ◽  
...  
1989 ◽  
Vol 40 (3) ◽  
pp. 497 ◽  
Author(s):  
CWL Henderson

The relationships between soil penetration resistance and the growth and yield of wheat were examined for a range of tillage and compaction experiments conducted on earthy sands near Geraldton, W.A. Overall, a single index of penetration resistance explained around 50% of the growth and yield variation, across sites and seasons. Equations using this index showed good potential for predicting the impact of various tillage and traffic practices on wheat yield.


2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Amit Kumar Srivast ◽  
Nima Safaei ◽  
Saeed Khaki ◽  
Gina Lopez ◽  
Wenzhi Zeng ◽  
...  

Abstract Crop yield forecasting depends on many interactive factors including crop genotype, weather, soil, and management practices. This study analyzes the performance of machine learning and deep learning methods for winter wheat yield prediction using extensive datasets of weather, soil, and crop phenology. We propose a convolutional neural network (CNN) which uses the 1-dimentional convolution operation to capture the time dependencies of environmental variables. The proposed CNN, evaluated along with other machine learning models for winter wheat yield prediction in Germany, outperformed all other models tested. To address the seasonality, weekly features were used that explicitly take soil moisture and meteorological events into account. Our results indicated that nonlinear models such as deep learning models and XGboost are more effective in finding the functional relationship between the crop yield and input data compared to linear models and deep neural networks had a higher prediction accuracy than XGboost. One of the main limitations of machine learning models is their black box property. Therefore, we moved beyond prediction and performed feature selection, as it provides key results towards explaining yield prediction (variable importance by time). As such, our study indicates which variables have the most significant effect on winter wheat yield.


2021 ◽  
Vol 123 ◽  
pp. 126204
Author(s):  
Juan Cao ◽  
Zhao Zhang ◽  
Yuchuan Luo ◽  
Liangliang Zhang ◽  
Jing Zhang ◽  
...  

2016 ◽  
Vol 121 ◽  
pp. 57-65 ◽  
Author(s):  
X.E. Pantazi ◽  
D. Moshou ◽  
T. Alexandridis ◽  
R.L. Whetton ◽  
A.M. Mouazen

2021 ◽  
Vol 169 (3-4) ◽  
Author(s):  
Florian Schierhorn ◽  
Max Hofmann ◽  
Taras Gagalyuk ◽  
Igor Ostapchuk ◽  
Daniel Müller

AbstractRising weather volatility poses a growing challenge to crop yields in many global breadbaskets. However, empirical evidence regarding the effects of extreme weather conditions on crop yields remains incomplete. We examine the contribution of climate and weather to winter wheat yields in Ukraine, a leading crop exporter with some of the highest yield variabilities observed globally. We used machine learning to link daily climatic data with annual winter wheat yields from 1985 to 2018. We differentiated the impacts of long-term climatic conditions (e.g., temperature) and weather extremes (e.g., heat waves) on yields during the distinct developmental stages of winter wheat. Our results suggest that climatic and weather variables alone explained 54% of the wheat yield variability at the country level. Heat waves, tropical night waves, frost, and drought conditions, particularly during the reproductive and grain filling phase, constitute key factors that compromised wheat yields in Ukraine. Assessing the impacts of weather extremes on crop yields is urgent to inform strategies that help cushion farmers against growing production risks because these extremes will likely become more frequent and intense with climate change.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document