New standards in stochastic simulations of dairy cow disease modelling: Bio-economic dynamic optimization for rational health management decision-making

2021 ◽  
Vol 194 ◽  
pp. 103249
Author(s):  
Ahmed Ferchiou ◽  
Guillaume Lhermie ◽  
Didier Raboisson
2020 ◽  
Vol 20 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Bey-Marrié Schmidt ◽  
Christopher J. Colvin ◽  
Ameer Hohlfeld ◽  
Natalie Leon

Abstract Background Data harmonisation (DH) has emerged amongst health managers, information technology specialists and researchers as an important intervention for routine health information systems (RHISs). It is important to understand what DH is, how it is defined and conceptualised, and how it can lead to better health management decision-making. This scoping review identifies a range of definitions for DH, its characteristics (in terms of key components and processes), and common explanations of the relationship between DH and health management decision-making. Methods This scoping review identified relevant studies from 2000 onwards (date filter), written in English and published in PubMed, Web of Science and CINAHL. Two reviewers independently screened records for potential inclusion for the abstract and full-text screening stages. One reviewer did the data extraction, analysis and synthesis, with built-in reliability checks from the rest of the team. We developed a narrative synthesis of definitions and explanations of the relationship between DH and health management decision-making. Results We sampled 61 of 181 included to synthesis definitions and concepts of DH in detail. We identified six common terms for data harmonisation: record linkage, data linkage, data warehousing, data sharing, data interoperability and health information exchange. We also identified nine key components of data harmonisation: DH involves (a) a process of multiple steps; (b) integrating, harmonising and bringing together different databases (c) two or more databases; (d) electronic data; (e) pooling data using unique patient identifiers; and (f) different types of data; (g) data found within and across different departments and institutions at facility, district, regional and national levels; (h) different types of technical activities; (i) has a specific scope. The relationship between DH and health management decision-making is not well-described in the literature. Several studies mentioned health providers’ concerns about data completeness, data quality, terminology and coding of data elements as barriers to data utilisation for clinical decision-making. Conclusion To our knowledge, this scoping review was the first to synthesise definitions and concepts of DH and address the causal relationship between DH and health management decision-making. Future research is required to assess the effectiveness of data harmonisation on health management decision-making.


Sensors ◽  
2018 ◽  
Vol 18 (7) ◽  
pp. 2316 ◽  
Author(s):  
Kai Song ◽  
Peng Xu ◽  
Guo Wei ◽  
Yinsheng Chen ◽  
Qi Wang

Metal Oxide Semiconductor (MOS) gas sensor has been widely used in sensor systems for the advantages of fast response, high sensitivity, low cost, and so on. But, limited to the properties of materials, the phenomenon, such as aging, poisoning, and damage of the gas sensitive material will affect the measurement quality of MOS gas sensor array. To ensure the stability of the system, a health management decision strategy for the prognostics and health management (PHM) of a sensor system that is based on health reliability degree (HRD) and grey group decision-making (GGD) is proposed in this paper. The health management decision-making model is presented to choose the best health management strategy. Specially, GGD is utilized to provide health management suggestions for the sensor system. To evaluate the status of the sensor system, a joint HRD-GGD framework is declared as the health management decision-making. In this method, HRD of sensor system is obtained by fusing the output data of each sensor. The optimal decision-making recommendations for health management of the system is proposed by combining historical health reliability degree, maintenance probability, and overhaul rate. Experimental results on four different kinds of health levels demonstrate that the HRD-GGD method outperforms other methods in decision-making accuracy of sensor system. Particularly, the proposed HRD-GGD decision-making method achieves the best decision accuracy of 98.25%.


2018 ◽  
Vol 17 (2) ◽  
pp. 55-65 ◽  
Author(s):  
Michael Tekieli ◽  
Marion Festing ◽  
Xavier Baeten

Abstract. Based on responses from 158 reward managers located at the headquarters or subsidiaries of multinational enterprises, the present study examines the relationship between the centralization of reward management decision making and its perceived effectiveness in multinational enterprises. Our results show that headquarters managers perceive a centralized approach as being more effective, while for subsidiary managers this relationship is moderated by the manager’s role identity. Referring to social identity theory, the present study enriches the standardization versus localization debate through a new perspective focusing on psychological processes, thereby indicating the importance of in-group favoritism in headquarters and the influence of subsidiary managers’ role identities on reward management decision making.


2006 ◽  
Author(s):  
Leigh A. Baumgart ◽  
Ellen J. Bass ◽  
Brenda Philips ◽  
Kevin Kloesel

2017 ◽  
Vol 26 (7) ◽  
pp. 551 ◽  
Author(s):  
Christopher J. Dunn ◽  
David E. Calkin ◽  
Matthew P. Thompson

Wildfire’s economic, ecological and social impacts are on the rise, fostering the realisation that business-as-usual fire management in the United States is not sustainable. Current response strategies may be inefficient and contributing to unnecessary responder exposure to hazardous conditions, but significant knowledge gaps constrain clear and comprehensive descriptions of how changes in response strategies and tactics may improve outcomes. As such, we convened a special session at an international wildfire conference to synthesise ongoing research focused on obtaining a better understanding of wildfire response decisions and actions. This special issue provides a collection of research that builds on those discussions. Four papers focus on strategic planning and decision making, three papers on use and effectiveness of suppression resources and two papers on allocation and movement of suppression resources. Here we summarise some of the key findings from these papers in the context of risk-informed decision making. This collection illustrates the value of a risk management framework for improving wildfire response safety and effectiveness, for enhancing fire management decision making and for ushering in a new fire management paradigm.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document