A critical reappraisal of aspirin for secondary prevention in patients with ischemic heart disease

2016 ◽  
Vol 181 ◽  
pp. 92-100 ◽  
Author(s):  
Robert C. Welsh ◽  
Matthew T. Roe ◽  
Philippe Gabriel Steg ◽  
Stefan James ◽  
Thomas J. Povsic ◽  
...  
PLoS ONE ◽  
2020 ◽  
Vol 15 (11) ◽  
pp. e0242707
Author(s):  
Shigetaka Kageyama ◽  
Koichiro Murata ◽  
Ryuzo Nawada ◽  
Tomoya Onodera ◽  
Yuichiro Maekawa

Cardiovascular disease, including ischemic heart disease, is a leading cause of death worldwide. Improvement of the secondary prevention of ischemic heart disease is necessary. We established a unique referral system to connect hospitals and outpatient clinics to coordinate care between general practitioners and cardiologists. Here, we evaluated the impact and long-term benefits of our system for ischemic heart disease patients undergoing secondary prevention therapy after percutaneous coronary intervention. This single-center retrospective observational study included 3658 consecutive patients who underwent percutaneous coronary intervention at Shizuoka City Hospital between 2010 and 2019. After percutaneous coronary intervention, patients were considered conventional outpatients (conventional follow-up group) or subjected to our unique referral system (referral system group) at the attending cardiologist’s discretion. To audit compliance of the treatment with the latest Japanese guidelines, we adopted a circulation-type referral system, whereby general practitioners needed to refer registered patients at least once a year, even if no cardiac events occurred. Clinical events in each patient were evaluated. Net adverse clinical events were defined as a combination of major adverse cardiac, cerebrovascular, and major bleeding events. There were 2241 and 1417 patients in the conventional follow-up and referral system groups, with mean follow-ups of 1255 and 1548 days and cumulative net adverse clinical event incidences of 27.6% and 21.5%, respectively. Kaplan–Meier analysis showed that the occurrence of net adverse clinical events was significantly lower in the referral system group than in the conventional follow-up group (log-rank: P<0.001). Univariate and multivariate analyses revealed that the unique referral system was a significant predictor of the net clinical benefits (hazard ratio: 0.56, 95% confidence interval: 0.37–0.83, P = 0.004). This result was consistent after propensity-score matching. In summary, our unique referral system contributed to long-term net clinical benefits for the secondary prevention of ischemic heart disease after percutaneous coronary intervention.


2009 ◽  
Vol 62 (9-10) ◽  
pp. 450-455 ◽  
Author(s):  
Vesna Radovic

Convincing evidence of the decline of mortality has been achieved with beta-blockers in patients with an acute myocardial infarction and in post-infarction follow-up. The beta-blockers are also the most efficient antianginal medications for the decrease of ischemia in outpatients. They are highly efficient as a monotherapy for angina and are also a medication of choice for angina after the coronary. The objective of this work was an estimate of the use of beta-blockers in secondary prevention of the ischemic heart disease and eliminating doubts concerning their prescription. The method of the analysis sums up the results of a twenty-five- year study on of the outcome of the treatment with beta-blockers in secondary prevention of the ischemic heart disease. The method of the work implies an examination of the professional literature and the data-bases, such as MEDLINE, PubMed and KOBSON. The first studies concerned non-selective beta-blockers, used orally. The following studies concerned cardioselective beta-blockers, metoprolol and atenolol. Several studies followed also the effect of beta-blockers and heparin, or beta-blockers and antagonists of calcium towards placebo, in patients with an unstable angina pectoris. Beta-blockers are an essential drug in secondary prevention of the myocardial infarction and in chronic heart failure. The necessary condition for the efficiency of beta-blockers is an early use. Beta-blockers should be given within 12 hours after the appearance of pain. The continuation of the therapy with beta-blockers after the acute phase is considered to be important in the decrease of the infarction zone expansion. Prophylactic use of beta-blockers after the coronary has an excellent effect, above all in patients with a minor, uncomplicated coronary. Though certain groups of beta-blockers have some special characteristics, when it comes to the treatment of angina pectoris, all beta-blockers are efficient. Generally, patients react well to them. Preference is given to cardioselective remedies, in patients with diabetes or lung disease. Exhaustive controlled clinical studies affirm beta-blockers as drugs that reduce mortality in secondary prevention of the ischemic heart disease.


2004 ◽  
Vol 164 (19) ◽  
pp. 2156 ◽  
Author(s):  
Brian J. Wells ◽  
Arch G. Mainous ◽  
Lori M. Dickerson

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document