A Proposed Framework to Monitor Daily Oral Antiretroviral Pre-Exposure Prophylaxis in the U.S

2013 ◽  
Vol 44 (1) ◽  
pp. S141-S146 ◽  
Author(s):  
Dawn K. Smith ◽  
John Beltrami
Keyword(s):  
Author(s):  
Aleta Baldwin ◽  
Brenda Light ◽  
Waridibo E. Allison

AbstractUsing a socioecological approach, this review describes the peer-reviewed literature on oral pre-exposure prophylaxis (PrEP) among both cisgender (cis women) and transgender women (trans women) in the U.S. A search of the PubMed database and HIV-related conference abstracts generated over 2,200 articles and abstracts. Of these, 103 fulfilled review inclusion criteria. Most of the existing research presents findings on individual-level factors associated with PrEP use such as willingness and perceived barriers. There was far less investigation of factors related to PrEP at more distal ecological levels. Though trans women are at greater risk of HIV infection than cisgender women, less is known about this population group with respect to PrEP despite their inclusion in many major clinical trials. Further, the literature is characterized by a persistent conflation of sex and gender which makes it difficult to accurately assess the reviewed research on HIV prevention and PrEP apart from risk group. Informed by these findings, we highlight specific opportunities to improve access to PrEP and reduce socioecological barriers to PrEP care engagement for cisgender and transgender women.


2020 ◽  
Vol 44 ◽  
pp. 16-30 ◽  
Author(s):  
Patrick S. Sullivan ◽  
Farah Mouhanna ◽  
Robertino Mera ◽  
Elizabeth Pembleton ◽  
Amanda D. Castel ◽  
...  

2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Eric Walsh-Buhi ◽  
Rebecca Fagen Houghton ◽  
Claire Lange ◽  
Ryli Hockensmith ◽  
Lourdes Martinez

BACKGROUND There is still an HIV epidemic in the U.S., which is a substantial issue for priority populations bearing a disproportionate burden of HIV infection. Daily oral pre-exposure prophylaxis (PrEP) has been shown to be safe and effective in reducing the risk of sexual HIV acquisition. However, large studies of young people, gay and bisexual men, transmasculine individuals, and Black people in the U.S. document that PrEP awareness and usage is low. There is limited understanding of social media as a source of information on PrEP. OBJECTIVE Given the paucity of research on PrEP-related Instagram posts and the popularity of the social media platform, the purpose of this research is to focus on PrEP-related messaging/communications on Instagram. METHODS Using Crowdtangle Search, we retrieved publicly accessible and English-language-only Instagram posts for the 12-month period preceding April 22, 2020, using the following search terms: Truvada or “pre-exposure prophylaxis” or #truvada or #truvadaprep or #truvadawhore or #truvadaforprep. We employed a qualitative coding methodology to manually extract information from this sample of Instagram posts. Using a pre-tested codebook, we performed a content analysis on N=250 posts, examining source and message characteristics, including specific information about PrEP and indicated users. Frequencies and percentages were calculated for all categorical variables. A chi-square analysis was conducted to determine statistical differences between source types on a variety of message characteristics. RESULTS More than three-quarters of all posts (n=193, 77.2%) were posted by organizations. Of the 250 Instagram posts reviewed, more than two-thirds (n=174, 69.6%) included some sort of photo, more than half (n=142, 56.8%) included an infographic (i.e., images containing factual information/data/charts), and approximately one in 10 (n=30, 12%) included a video. We observed that more than half of all reviewed Instagram posts defined PrEP (n=137, 54.8%), but fewer posts promoted PrEP use, explained how PrEP works, and included information on PrEP’s effectiveness or who can use PrEP. The most commonly hashtagged priority population among posts was men who have sex with men, but not necessarily bisexual men. Very few posts contained race- or ethnicity-related hashtags (n=11, 4.4%). Even fewer posts contained transgender-associated tags (e.g., #transgirl; n=5, 2.0%). No posts contained tags related to heterosexuals or injection drug users. We found statistical differences between source types (i.e., individual versus organization). CONCLUSIONS This study is among the first to review Instagram postings for content specifically related to PrEP. The National AIDS Strategy’s call to more clearly articulate the science surrounding HIV risk and prevention is more fully addressed by first understanding the current public information environment surrounding PrEP. The present study seeks to begin answering this call by offering a snapshot of how PrEP is being discussed (and by whom) on one of the most popular social media platforms.


2020 ◽  
Vol 7 (1) ◽  
pp. 10-17
Author(s):  
Oluwatosin Olateju ◽  
◽  
Deb Dunn ◽  
Patricia McLaine ◽  
Sharon Barrett ◽  
...  

Objectives To date, only few United States (US) states have explicit regulations that allow minors to independently give consent for human immunodeficiency virus infection (HIV) prevention treatments. This manuscript will reflect upon key advocacy efforts leading to the revision of the Maryland Minor Consent Law, evaluate current human immunodeficiency virus infection and acquired immune deficiency syndrome (HIV/AIDS) prevention laws for minors in U.S. states, and highlight resources for health advocacy. Methods Between 2018-2019, public health professionals in Baltimore, Maryland reviewed the Maryland Minor Consent Law and other adolescent consent laws within the U.S. The professionals advocated for a legal review of the gap by the State Senate and the Office of Attorney General. Results In May 2019, the public health advocates were successful in their effort for a revision of the Maryland Minor Consent Law to include Treatment for the Prevention of HIV-Consent by minors. Upon their review of all adolescent consent laws within the U.S., they found that only eleven states currently have explicit language indicative of an adolescent’s ability to give consent for pre-exposure prophylaxis (PrEP). Conclusion This inquiry can change upstream factors such as laws, regulations, policies and institutional practices.


Author(s):  
Oluwafemi Adeagbo ◽  
Sayward Harrison ◽  
Shan Qiao ◽  
Xiaoming Li

Black men who have sex with men (BMSM) living in the United States (U.S.) South are disproportionately affected by HIV and experience significant disparities in HIV incidence, access to HIV care, and prevention across ages and socio-economic statuses. The aim of this commentary is to critically review current literature on the state of PrEP use among BMSM in the U.S. South, including identifying barriers and facilitators to PrEP use in order to inform intervention development. Extant literature shows that despite the documented benefits of PrEP as an effective HIV-prevention method, its uptake among BMSM is limited across the U.S. South. Common barriers to PrEP uptake included stigma, homophobia, mistrust of healthcare systems, negative attitudes from healthcare providers, access and transportation issues, poverty, and misinformation about PrEP. These barriers are likely to have been further exacerbated by the COVID-19 pandemic. Limited access to PrEP and other HIV-prevention programs, such as HIV testing, post-exposure prophylaxis (PEP), and condoms for BMSM are likely increase HIV incidence in this community. Moreover, the rapid expansion of telehealth services during the COVID-19 period may offer increased opportunity to scale-up PrEP through telehealth interventions, especially if in-person services remain limited due to pandemic precautions. Given the intersectional barriers that limit the access and uptake of PrEP among BMSM, we suggest that tailored programs or interventions that seek to address PrEP disparities among Southern BMSM should adopt intersectional and interdisciplinary approaches to better understand the complex challenges of scaling up PrEP. More studies are needed to investigate the impact of COVID-19 on HIV-prevention services among BMSM and to understand how to co-develop—with the BMSM community and healthcare providers—culturally acceptable interventions to reduce the identified challenges using intersectional and interdisciplinary approaches.


2019 ◽  
Vol 55 (4) ◽  
pp. 525-533 ◽  
Author(s):  
Alberto Edeza ◽  
Angela Bazzi ◽  
Peter Salhaney ◽  
Dea Biancarelli ◽  
Ellen Childs ◽  
...  

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document