Comparison of Clinical Characteristics, Treatments and Outcomes of Patients With ST-Elevation Acute Myocardial Infarction With Versus Without New or Presumed New Left Bundle Branch Block (from NCDR®)

2012 ◽  
Vol 109 (4) ◽  
pp. 497-501 ◽  
Author(s):  
Khung Keong Yeo ◽  
Shuang Li ◽  
Ezra A. Amsterdam ◽  
Tracy Y. Wang ◽  
Deepak L. Bhatt ◽  
...  
2010 ◽  
Vol 55 (10) ◽  
pp. A107.E1000 ◽  
Author(s):  
Khung Keong Yeo ◽  
Shuang Li ◽  
Tracy Y. Wang ◽  
Deepak L. Bhatt ◽  
Jorge Saucedo ◽  
...  

2012 ◽  
Vol 45 (4) ◽  
pp. 361-367 ◽  
Author(s):  
Nilay Mehta ◽  
Henry D. Huang ◽  
Salman Bandeali ◽  
James M. Wilson ◽  
Yochai Birnbaum

2018 ◽  
Vol 69 (6) ◽  
pp. 1554-1557
Author(s):  
Larisa Anghel ◽  
Catalina Arsenescu Georgescu

The prevalence of coronary artery disease, a major contributor to cardiovascular disease, is related to the increasing prevalence of modifiable risk factors.The aim of our study was to determine the risk factors for acute myocardial infarction among patients from North East Romania.We evaluated patients with acute myocardial infarction with or without left bundle-branch block, hospitalized in Georgescu Institute of Cardiovascular Disease Iasi for three years. The results of our study show that patients with acute myocardial infarction and new left bundle branch block have a more recent history of hypertension, dyslipidemia and smoker status compared to patients without left bundle branch block. Nearly two thirds of patients included in the study (65.47%) had an elevated cholesterol level, with a high prevalence of dyslipidemia in patients with myocardial infarction and new left bundle branch block. More than two-thirds of patients with new left bundle branch block had a history of arterial hypertension (69.04% vs. 50.0%, p = 0.354), especially grade 2 hypertension, with a slight predominance in those with new left bundle branch block, but without statistically significant differences between the two groups (45.23% vs. 30.95%, p = 0.358). Early identification of modifiable risk factors is vital to set the strategy for prevention and special attention must be paid to smoking. An adequate control of cardiovascular risk factors would result in a significant reduction of coronary events in patients from the North East part of Romania.


2017 ◽  
Vol 7 (3) ◽  
pp. 208-217 ◽  
Author(s):  
Vijaya K Pera ◽  
David M Larson ◽  
Scott W Sharkey ◽  
Ross F Garberich ◽  
Christopher J Solie ◽  
...  

Aims: Using a comprehensive large prospective regional ST-elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) system database, we evaluated the prevalence, clinical and angiographic characteristics, and outcomes in patients with ischemic symptoms and new or presumed new left bundle branch block (LBBB). We then tested a new hierarchical diagnosis and triage algorithm to identify more accurately new LBBB patients with an acute culprit lesion. Methods and results: From March 2003 to June 2013, 3903 consecutive STEMI patients were treated using the Minneapolis Heart Institute regional STEMI protocol including 131 patients (3.3%) with new LBBB. These patients had fewer culprit arteries (54.2% vs. 86.4%; P<0.001), were older, more commonly women, with a lower ejection fraction, and more frequently presented with cardiac arrest or heart failure than those without new LBBB. At 1 year follow-up, all-cause mortality accounting for baseline differences was higher in patients with new LBBB (hazard ratio 1.73, 95% confidence interval 1.17–2.58; P=0.007). The new algorithm yielded high sensitivity (97%) and negative predictive value (94%) for identification of a culprit lesion. Using the definition of new LBBB with either hemodynamically unstable features or Sgarbossa concordance criteria on electrocardiogram (ECG), 45% of new LBBB patients would have been treated as ‘STEMI equivalent’. Conclusion: Patients with acute ischemic symptoms and new LBBB represent a high-risk population with unique clinical challenges. If validated in an independent dataset, the new algorithm may improve the diagnostic accuracy regarding reperfusion therapy for new LBBB patients.


2010 ◽  
Vol 55 (10) ◽  
pp. A107.E1002
Author(s):  
Michael C. Kontos ◽  
Vinh Q. Chau ◽  
Charlotte S. Roberts ◽  
Joseph P. Ornato ◽  
George W. Vetrovec

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document