scholarly journals 253 Opioid Prescribing Patterns for Emergency Department Patients With Ureterolithiasis and the Impact on Pain-Related Return Visits

2019 ◽  
Vol 74 (4) ◽  
pp. S99-S100
Author(s):  
D.P. Betten ◽  
C. Bougie ◽  
J.L. Jaquint
Keyword(s):  
Emergency Department ◽  
Prescribing Patterns ◽  
Opioid Prescribing ◽  
Return Visits ◽  
Emergency Department Patients ◽  
The Impact

scholarly journals P113: Examining emergency physicians’ self-reported opioid prescribing practices for the treatment of acute pain: A Newfoundland perspective

CJEM ◽  
2020 ◽  
Vol 22 (S1) ◽  
pp. S105-S106
Author(s):  
P. Doran ◽  
G. Sheppard ◽  
B. Metcalfe
Keyword(s):  
Emergency Department ◽  
Acute Pain ◽  
Oral Morphine ◽  
Prescribing Patterns ◽  
Evidence Based ◽  
Emergency Physicians ◽  
Prescribing Practices ◽  
Opioid Prescribing ◽  
Ensure Patient Safety ◽  
Evidence Based Guidelines

Introduction: Canadians are the second largest consumers of prescription opioids per capita in the world. Emergency physicians tend to prescribe stronger and larger quantities of opioids, while family physicians write the most opioid prescriptions overall. These practices have been shown to precipitate future dependence, toxicity and the need for hospitalization. Despite this emerging evidence, there is a paucity of research on emergency physicians’ opioid prescribing practices in Canada. The objectives of this study were to describe our local emergency physicians’ opioid prescribing patterns both in the emergency department and upon discharge, and to explore factors that impact their prescribing decisions. Methods: Emergency physicians from two urban, adult emergency departments in St. John's, Newfoundland were anonymously surveyed using a web-based survey tool. All 42 physicians were invited to participate via email during the six-week study period and reminders were sent at weeks two and four. Results: A total of 21 participants responded to the survey. Over half of respondents (57.14%) reported that they “often” prescribe opioids for the treatment of acute pain in the emergency department, and an equal number of respondents reported doing so “sometimes” at discharge. Eighty-five percent of respondents reported most commonly prescribing intravenous morphine for acute pain in the emergency department, and over thirty-five percent reported most commonly prescribing oral morphine upon discharge. Patient age and risk of misuse were the most frequently cited factors that influenced respondents’ prescribing decisions. Only 4 of the 22 respondents reported using evidence-based guidelines to tailor their opioid prescribing practices, while an overwhelming majority (80.95%) believe there is a need for evidence-based opioid prescribing guidelines for the treatment of acute pain. Sixty percent of respondents completed additional training in safe opioid prescribing, yet less than half of respondents (42.86%) felt they could help to mitigate the opioid crisis by prescribing fewer opioids in the emergency department. Conclusion: Emergency physicians frequently prescribe opioids for the treatment of acute pain and new evidence suggests that this practice can lead to significant morbidity. While further research is needed to better understand emergency physicians’ opioid prescribing practices, our findings support the need for evidence-based guidelines for the treatment of acute pain to ensure patient safety.

The Impact of Unstable Angina Guidelines in the Triage of Emergency Department Patients with Possible Acute Coronary Syndrome

2006 ◽  
Vol 26 (6) ◽  
pp. 606-616 ◽  
Author(s):  
David A. Katz ◽  
Tom P. Aufderheide ◽  
Mark Bogner ◽  
Peter R. Rahko ◽  
Roger L. Brown ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Emergency Department ◽  
Acute Coronary Syndrome ◽  
Unstable Angina ◽  
Coronary Syndrome ◽  
Emergency Department Patients ◽  
The Impact

The Impact of Trauma Care on Non-trauma Emergency Department Patients

2007 ◽  
Vol 14 (5 Supplement 1) ◽  
pp. S78-S78
Author(s):  
D. Smith ◽  
A. Chapital ◽  
C. Ho ◽  
B. Burgess
Keyword(s):  
Emergency Department ◽  
Trauma Care ◽  
Emergency Department Patients ◽  
The Impact

scholarly journals Factors Affecting 72-Hour Unplanned Return Visits after Emergency Department Index Discharge of a Tertiary Private Hospital in the Philippines

2020 ◽  
Vol 54 (5) ◽  
Author(s):  
Ma. Lourdes Concepcion D. Jimenez ◽  
Rafael L. Manzanera ◽  
Ronne D. Abeleda ◽  
Diego A. Moya ◽  
Jose V. Segura ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Emergency Department ◽  
Length Of Stay ◽  
Strong Association ◽  
Tertiary Hospital ◽  
The Philippines ◽  
Third Party ◽  
Factors Affecting ◽  
Premature Discharge ◽  
Return Visits ◽  
Emergency Department Patients

Objectives. This study aimed to analyze if the indicator 72-hours Unplanned Return Visits after EmergencyDepartment (ED) index discharge was influenced by the patient’s age, triage severity, month, payment methods,and length of stay. Likewise, it aimed to determine if the 72-hour Unplanned Return Visits was a robust indicator inassessing the quality of Emergency Department services. Methods. This was a retrospective single-center study from January to December 2017. Data were retrievedfrom a tertiary hospital in the Philippines. All Emergency Department patients discharged on their index visitwere monitored for Unplanned Return Visits within 72 hours in the hospital. A univariate and multivariate logisticregression model was used to assess the variables associated with the 72-hour Unplanned Return Visits. Results. The 72-hour Unplanned Return Visits rate was measured at 2.67%, with the highest occurrence on thefirst 24 hours, and with predominance on third-party payer (p.<.0001), pediatrics (p.<0001), January (p<.0001),February (p<.0001), November (p<.0001), December (p<0001), and shorter length of stay (p<.0001) dischargedafter ED index visit. Conclusions. Strong association of Unplanned Return Visits during the first 72 hours after Emergency Departmentindex discharge was found for patients financed through third party-payers, with seasonal variations andinclination to the younger population with shorter length of stay. These findings warrant exploratory studies todetermine the reasons for the 72-hour Unplanned Return Visits after Emergency Department index discharge andinvestigation on the association of premature discharge, socio-economic, health structure, and illness progression.

Telehealth acceptability and opioid prescribing patterns of providers of painful chronic diseases during the COVID-19 pandemic: A survey of sickle cell providers

2021 ◽  
Vol 17 (6) ◽  
pp. 489-497
Author(s):  
Martha O. Kenney, MD ◽  
Benjamin Becerra, DrPH; MBA, MPH, MS ◽  
Sean Alexander Beatty, BA ◽  
Wally R. Smith, MD
Keyword(s):  
Chronic Diseases ◽  
Sickle Cell ◽  
Online Survey ◽  
Management Practices ◽  
Risk Mitigation ◽  
The United States ◽  
Prescribing Patterns ◽  
Prescribing Practices ◽  
Opioid Prescribing ◽  
The Impact

Objective: The coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) has led to a rapid transition to telehealth services. It is unclear how subspecialists managing painful chronic diseases—such as sickle cell disease (SCD), an inherited hemoglobinopathy with significant disparities in access and outcomes—have viewed the transition to telehealth or altered their pain management practices. This study elicits the views of sickle cell providers regarding their transition to telehealth and their opioid prescribing patterns during the COVID-19 pandemic.Design: An anonymous online survey was sent to eligible sickle cell providers.Setting: Comprehensive sickle cell centers and/or clinics across the United States. Participants: Physicians and advanced practice providers providing care to SCD patients.Main outcome measures: Respondents answered questions regarding their (1) views of telehealth compared to in-person encounters and (2) opioid prescribing practices during the early months of the pandemic.Results: Of the 130 eligible participants, 53 respondents from 35 different sickle cell centers completed at least 90 percent of the survey. Respondents reported a significant increase in telehealth encounters for routine and acute appointments (mean difference and standard deviation: 57.6 ± 31.9 percent, p 0.001 and 24.4 ± 34.1 percent, p 0.001, respectively) since COVID-19. The overwhelming majority of respondents reported no changes in their opioid prescribing patterns since COVID-19, despite increased telehealth use. Only a minority coprescribed naloxone as a risk mitigation strategy.Conclusion: The rapid uptake of telehealth has not suppressed ambulatory providers’ prescribing of opioids for SCD. Studies assessing the impact of the COVID-19 pandemic and telehealth on opioid prescribing practices in other painful chronic diseases are needed to ensure health equity for vulnerable pain patients.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document